User talk:OccultZone/Archive 4

A kitten for you!
This wiki-kitten is there to say "thank you" for your wiki-gnoming work. I have seen your copyedits on many an article that I am reviewing weekly for WikiProject Poland new article alerts - thank you for dealing with so many recent changes! Also, because it is my sincere belief that positive reinforcement is a key to running collective intelligence projects like our 'pedia. Cheers!

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:45, 3 June 2014 (UTC) 


 * Thanks for that. I will be patrolling those wikiprojects someday. Right now the football, albums, biography requires urgent attention.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 10:50, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Is there any area on Wikipedia that does not require urgent attention? :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:07, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * None! You've been around since 2004.Emblem-cool.svg Ever got bored?  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 11:10, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * You may want to fix your typo. It is "if youu", should be "if you".  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 17:23, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Ha, I guess I must have been a bit stressed to get this typo in. But, that sock is not permbanned, I'd rather avoid that page least I draw attention of the troll(s). For the last few years I have been quite happily mostly troll-free and I'd like to continue my wiki-life in such a fashion :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't know whether it was a sock puppet or not, just WP:NOTHERE.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 09:03, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeed. Through I have to admit I am positively surprised people realized that. Few years ago such NOTHERE accounts were numerous and hardly ever blocked. I'd like to think that something changed over the last few years, making our current wiki-world a much safer place. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:24, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Can't see anyone who will hurt or torture. I can affirm that. When I go through the archives of 2005-2007, I would still find some horrible posts. Don't why they weren't deleted.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 09:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of pages
I think some pages should just be blanked as courtesy as they await total deletion by Wikipedia administrators. I have seen the blanked as courtesy being used by various editors. A case in point if the page Murali Sekar-Learn ABAP. It is a copyvio and it is an advertisement at the same time. What do you think about it? Aha... (talk) 08:45, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I've notified JamesBWatson about this issue. Other admin will get online, but later.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 09:04, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Ashu Gaba
Thanks, another admin has deleted and salted now  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  18:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * speedied as author request  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  19:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanked.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 19:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Incidents of necrophilia
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Your new articles will now be autopatrolled. Please see WP:AUTOPAT for any additional information you may require, or let me know. Thanks, and happy article creating.  Go  Phightins  !  23:32, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and finally. I had just created my 70th article. It looks like there is need of many more ambassador related articles. I hope you are having great time with your adminship, an accomplishment that you have recently achieved.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 23:40, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nominations
Please be more careful when nominating articles for speedy deletion.
 * This was not nonsense.
 * Diseases and epidemics of the 19th century was tagged by you as vandalism, which it patently wasn't. I don't understand why an admin deleted it as vandalism either.
 * Pawan wadeyar wasn't advertising. I've restored it.
 * Manohar warti wasn't advertising. As it was a clear A7 candidate, I've not restored it.
 * BIOFIN wasn't advertising. I've restored it.

I thought I had discussed this with you before, but can't immediately find it in the history of your talk page. Have you considered archiving your talk page instead of simply removing posts? What you are doing is not against policy, but it is not the best solution in a collaborative environment like we have. You can archive manually or use one of the archive bots that do tihis for you. Fram (talk) 08:51, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I used that bot before, but they won't work at times, I had decided to make archive one day, whenever I may create a userpage.
 * I had tagged "Diseases and epidemics of the 19th century" as HOAX, you can read the summaries there is heavy amount of fringe. I never tagged it as vandalism, maybe someone else added that tag.
 * "Pawan wadeyar" is what I would agree with, I should've used the Afd instead, and expect a speedy delete, but it is a unsourced BLP, so there is option for another PROD.
 * Manohar warti was not advertising? Maybe the editor changed the article after reverting the PROD template, I might be confusing with another, but that may have happened.
 * BIOFIN - I agree.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 08:58, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The previous discussion took place on your talk page. It was User talk:Fram, about a fictional building.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 09:05, 5 June 2014 (UTC)


 * You did tag it as Vandalism though, both the tag at the page and your edit summary refer to vandalism, not as a hoax. Doesn't really matter either way, it isn't a hoax, it may be a thoroughly wrong article and it probably warrants deletion for some reason, but that doesn't make it a hoax. When a new editor creates an article (posts his homework, by the looks of it) and gets accused of vandalism and hoax creation, chances are that he will never return, instead of perhaps becoming a useful editor. Fram (talk) 09:08, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Pawan wadeyar will not get a speedy delete, and will probably not be deleted at all (once it gets a source). Check Govindaya Namaha and 2nd South Indian International Movie Awards.
 * Manohar warti: this was the full text when you tagged it for advertising: "Manohar Singh Warti( Mannu ) was born Devlekh on 26 April 1989 in Pithoragarh, Uttarakhand. His father, Himmat Singh Warti, led India's Animal century in forest departments, and grew up with His mother, Belmati Devi, at the Warti Bhawan Devlekh; a large family estate in Devlekh. Manohar had a  happy childhood.[6] His father was often away, directing Forest  activities ," (yes, it ends with a comma...) Fram (talk) 09:08, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Figured, Hoax and vandalism are same thing, it reads "Pages that include blatant and obvious misinformation or hoaxes. (G3)" I don't know what to do especially when you have restored the page? You informed the involved admin?
 * If no one will add source, I will source Pawan wadeyar. Everything else has been dealt.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 09:13, 5 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the thanks. Its good you informed the involved admin. Hopefully resolved.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 09:41, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Please share your opinion on Articles for deletion/BIOFIN, I will list that Afd to deletion sorting, but later.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 09:51, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Also Articles for deletion/Diseases and epidemics of the 19th century.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 09:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)


 * OK, vandalism was not quite the best reason for deleting diseases and epidemics of the 19th century. But since the title and content were both inappropriate, I deleted it. I invoke WP:SNOW - what was the point of using any other deletion route? Similar, but less strong arguments can be used to support my deletion of three other of the articles. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:15, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Absolutely RHaworth, I assumed that article to be based on fringe theories so I selected vandalism. There was no other reason.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 10:16, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * How was the title inappropriate? And how is an article based on fringe theories "vandalism" or "hoax"? This is some piece of schoolwork by someone young, I would guess, not some fringe advocate, never mind a vandal. Fram (talk) 10:33, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Need reviews
List of constituencies of Telangana Legislative Assembly--Vin09 (talk) 10:05, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 10:08, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Lists of newspapers on a state page
Pls see this section, I don't whether it is correct or not. Listing all newspaper on an important page. Please provide suggestions on Andhra Pradesh.--Vin09 (talk) 14:26, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Should be moved to List of newspapers in India, consider adding them to a Andhra Pradesh section.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 14:43, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

American football
Please don't change the disambiguation "American football" to footballer". Players that play in the NFL are known as American football players. Thanks.--Yankees10 16:37, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * It was hours ago. I had that page on my watchlist, I had questioned the involved administrator, and they have described it well. I think I had indirectly addressed the page move on it's noticeboard so the admin caught attention. I am discussing about the other page moves currently, but nothing to do with these football ones.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 16:46, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Just making sure you didn't change anymore, thats all.--Yankees10 17:26, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Review
Economy of Vijayawada--Vin09 (talk) 17:12, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Creative. ✅  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 17:13, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

IRC
Would you be willing to step into IRC to discuss something later this evening (any time after 9:30 PM ET)?  Go  Phightins  !  21:01, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I am online now.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 23:55, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Would you enter the IRC channel #wikipedia-coffeehouse?  Go  Phightins  !  01:16, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm there when you're ready.  Go  Phightins  !  01:28, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * There.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 01:32, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Are you Imzadi?  Go  Phightins  !  01:32, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * OccultZone, found. 01:39, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks a lot.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 02:54, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

BLP Parameters
Someone has to check Category:Biography articles without living parameter and add Category:Living people to those who are alive. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:55, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Nice finding, I think I can do that.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 17:37, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

deletion
Thanks, deleted and salted  Jimfbleak  -  talk to me?  18:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Personal attack?
While I know many here are very biased against Asians, I did not know they also post warnings! What do you have to say about zillions like that dude who does nothing but revert others edits? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parikhjigish (talk • contribs) 00:12, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * If they are biased, you are encouraged to inform them about the essential things that they don't know about the subject. Whenever you submit your knowledge especially to main article space, kindly add a reliable source to your information. I have no hard feelings for you, but it is usually a formality to warn users against the personal attacks. I probably don't want to see you getting blocked for that.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 00:16, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

I clearly asked the question. I had SAID " I am willing to put Sankrit texts for verification. Will you be able to read and translate?" Guess you ought to know that very likely most so called 'senior editors' will not be able to read and verify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parikhjigish (talk • contribs) 00:19, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Surely they wouldn't be, but don't you think that usually everyone is unaware about some languages?  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 00:31, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Review
Kondapalli railway station.--Vin09 (talk) 18:35, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Link?  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 18:36, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Kondapalli railway station--Vin09 (talk) 18:38, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 18:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Kondapalli railway station
I ran across the article Kondapalli railway station and noticed that you had marked the article as reviewed. I read over the article and was quite surprised to find numerous errors that had not been tagged or corrected. Rather than mark the article back to unreviewed and tag it appropriately, I went ahead and made the needed corrections. Please be more careful when marking articles as reviewed if you do not take the proper time time to either tag them appropriately or perhaps make the corrections yourself. Thank you. Carriearchdale (talk) 01:08, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't have to be. Subject exceeds an estimated amount of 50,000 in terms of search results. Makes it notable enough. Article seemed more than a test draft so it is fair to mark it as review. When you click on review, you further inform a person that the page is not a vandal, promotional, attack page, or anything that comes under the WP:PROD. If you want to make your own changes you can do them yourself, but it has to do nothing with the review. You have only non-capitalized 3-4 words which is hardly an improvement when it comes to 'numerous errors', errors are usually those that break the page or they are open invitation to other errors(such as wrong templates).  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 01:13, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Wow, can you say denial? Next time I won't do you the courtesy of kindly notifying you before I re-mark articles that you don't have time for as unreviewed! Have a great evening! ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 01:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

"You have only non-capitalized 3-4 words which is hardly an improvement when it comes to 'numerous errors'," WRONG Carriearchdale (talk) 01:22, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok, what were the errors? It can be known through the watchlist if someone has unreviewed the article. Some people use an automated template for notifying the reviewer, but most of the time they notify when they have turned PROD into other PROD. I hope you are aware of it.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 01:26, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

sorry
i believe i overrode your changes on the Silent Contest page. are you able to redo those....??? Happy  monsoon  day   02:33, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I think you had them, but I've categorized your article and linked from other articles, Have fun!  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 02:41, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Place of birth
Let's see how long it will take until "my police" removes the place of birth from the infobox because it doesn't appear in the article ;) (the article will grow eventually) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:54, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the late reply, birth place is not that important especially for a lead or the articles that have 2-5 lines. A separate "biography" section should be formed for that. But birth year is pretty important, some people have even added the birth year in the page title. It cannot be rejected either, but requires discussion. Bit strange.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 17:24, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

AWB usage
Looking through your contrib history, I was wondering about your AWB usage- it seems a bit on the side of using it to get a higher edit count. I'm not accusing you of anything- it's not like I'm an expert on AWB ;)- but I was just wondering. Thanks,  Lixxx235 Got a complaint? 14:28, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * It can be.. There are a number of editors,,, who have made most of their edits with AWB, because it is a good tool for resolving errors, adding non-controversial maintenance tags, etc.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 14:39, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

wrong sortkey and you readded persondata after it was removed. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:50, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I believe inflating edit count using AWB is against AWB policy. Thanks,  Lixxx235 Got a complaint? 14:51, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Recall that AWB is not bug's free and you are responsible for your edits. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:53, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't know what is your point here. Suppose if there is a specific problem or issue with 15,000 pages and you want to solve them with AWB, you are allowed. If you want to complete them on a single day still no one will object you. For example, there are more than 16,000 pages containing the "underlinked" tag, it usually takes about 20 seconds to solve each of it. Maybe AWB will be the best option for solving such issues.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 15:57, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * This isn't criticism, I was just wondering. Maybe it'd be a good idea to use a bot account to avoid the impression of inflating edit account? Just a thought. Thanks,  Lixxx235 Got a complaint? 15:59, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * It is and hopefully I shall get one someday.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 16:02, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * For constant tagging is better to use bot account than normal accounts. -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:35, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * From where I can start? :-)  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 16:46, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I suggest that you stick to manual edits for a while. Our need at the moment is on editor's checking their edits. This is the reason I leave you instructions. We have many tagging bots at the moment. -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:58, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Yes I was wondering a bit. But I do understand that.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 17:01, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Again here persondata is not needed. The infobox in the page was empty and wrong. -- Magioladitis (talk) 17:10, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Because we have already discussed about the bots and their situation. I wanted to know that if a bot is allowed to make cosmetic change on talk pages? I may have seen with the bot doing so, but I don't see any objection. There are an estimated of 200,000(I've counted half) of the articles that have inappropriate tag. I agree that if a bot has made about 5000 edits(all cosmetic), it can be easier to oppose such bot. Maybe because of such reason I thought that what if a bot makes 10 cosmetic changes, and the owner makes 10 effective changes after following those cosmetic changes? Or whoever is willing to take responsibility. If you are not sure, you can let me know, I can propose a model.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 17:14, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Goingbatty's bot adds WPBS around project banners. Josve05a's, when approved, will rearrange pages per WP:TPL. -- Magioladitis (talk) 17:17, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * If Goingbatty do that, I can simply tell goingbatty him. Although it might be matter of time whether he wants to do or not. I am not that curious about Joseve05a' bot though, but I hope there is nothing harmful in his bot anymore.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 17:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * When most people talk about cosmetic changes, they are really referring to insignificant or inconsequential edits that have no noticeable effect on the rendered page, which is not only against AWB's rule of use but will probably not get approved as a bot task. GoingBatty (talk) 17:44, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes I know. Exclusively, the main purpose is to create or pave some way for constructive edits. But what is with rearranging TPL? It is assumed by many as cosmetic change.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 17:58, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Maybe it would be helpful if "cosmetic change" was accurately defined somewhere. GoingBatty (talk) 17:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

fixed the family problem stated above. You should report these things. -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:07, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

The article coolie
Hi how are you.... I have tried over and over again to have the article coolie edited and nothing has happened. The article is completely false and it has a racist agenda. Coolie should be classed as Indentured Laborer and Indentured laborers are not slaves. Also the entymology is completely wrong. Coolie means unskilled Asian laborer or hireling. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/coolie

I have provided very credible sources stating that indentured laborer are not slaves and they have been disregarded and that is just wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richey90211 (talk • contribs) 19:55, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Sadly what you are doing is considered as "Edit warring". You cannot enforce your content after removing much of the content which they had written for years.
 * Coolies are not slaves in the today's world. That was in 19th-20th century (before WW2) when colonizers had enslaved coolies, they would try to profit from them as much as it was possible. Many of them died due to the lack of food. Have you read the related stories?
 * If you have some information and reliable source for the information you are welcome to attribute, but you don't have to remove content without consensus. Consensus on talk page is clearly against those edits that you had made. You've been told on WP:ANEW. I also think that once you learn how to edit these articles, you should edit some other articles, your account looks like a WP:SPA.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 00:54, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Boba milk tea with passion fruit for you

 * You are very welcome!  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 07:22, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Please use direct language when communicating with other users
Regarding you just left on another user's talk page. Please don't say "[This edit] has been reverted" when it was you who did it. Say "I reverted [this edit]", or similar. Using indirect language is bureaucratic and has an unpleasantly authoritarian tone that frequently upsets people who are on the receiving end of it.

This is not a formal request, merely advice from experience on how to help maintain a congenial editing environment. Thank you. —  Scott  •  talk  14:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Appeal statement
Hi there, much of my appeal statement on []'s talk page was a previous one, i improved my statement, please comment positively there, it 's very important for me. Rim sim (talk) 20:05, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * You learned that after 2-3 months of topic ban? You could have done before. Whenever you make any requests against the discretionary sanction, you have to talk about yourself than others. I can only see you talking about the other user. You are indirectly saying that Callanecc committed a mistake by believing on other user and now he should regret.
 * I have also checked your contribution history, you might be active a lot, but you haven't made even 500 contributions since the TBAN, you've to prove that you are capable of making edits without any further blocks.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 00:09, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your edit
Thanks four your edit on the page I recently created,Olawoye Theo Ladapo.occultzone, I guess we will best of friends here.cheers!(Wikicology (talk) 21:49, 10 June 2014 (UTC))
 * You are very welcome and I had edited your page a little more. Remember, that you should use as many sources as you can, on a page. You can post here anytime, happy editing.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 23:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=612485496 your edit] to Crawling Sky may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:42, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * |image     =  File:Crawlingskycoverart.jpg

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=612485719 your edit] to Creature of Havoc may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:45, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * |image= File:FF24 Creature of Havoc.jpg
 * ✅  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 11:58, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=612721834 your edit] to Curse of the Mummy may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:56, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * |image= File:FF59-Curse of the Mummy.jpg

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=612724107 your edit] to Daffy Duck for President may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:28, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * |image= File:Jones daffy d president cvr.jpg

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=612750794 your edit] to The Dawn (book) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:39, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * | image        =  Image:Morgenröthe.jpg

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=613681901 your edit] to Downturn Abbey may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:48, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * | image           =  File:Downturn Abbey.jpg

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=613709092 your edit] to Either/Or may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:13, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * is labeled Aesthetic. The middle circle is labeled Ethical. The inner circle is labeled Religious.
 * man. He is wearing a coat, with a necktie. He is looking to the bottom left, in a serious manner.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=613713816 your edit] to The Emperor of All Maladies may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:57, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * shows a crab in the center of the page, with the title above and the subtitle and author beneath

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=613879459 your edit] to The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:10, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * |alt=Cover of 1993 edition of The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=613973900 your edit] to Extra Virginity may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:14, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Extra+Virginity.jpg

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=614041239 your edit] to Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:25, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * |alt = Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=614070707 your edit] to Falling Man (novel) may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:00, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * |alt = Cover to the first edition
 * |Richard Drew]].

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=614085994 your edit] to The Field of Swords may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:38, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * | alt = The U.K. Book Cover of the Novel "The Field Of Swords".

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=614307698 your edit] to The Forests of Silence may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:49, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * |image= File:Forests of Silence Cover Version 1.png

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=614308384 your edit] to The Fortune of the Rougons may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:55, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * emile-la-fortune-des-rougon.html/ La Fortune des Rougon, audio version] Image:Speaker Icon.svg|20px

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=614469412 your edit] to Sanglorians may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:09, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * | years_active       = 2011–present

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=614972975 your edit] to Patrick Bellew may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * { reflist|2}

IEEE Cloud Computing
Hello! Thank you very much for taking a look at and fixing errors in the IEEE Cloud Computing article. I added a link from the Intercloud article to the IEEE Cloud Computing article, as they're of direct relevance to one another. Is that enough to remove the orphan tag? I could add links from other related articles (such as IEEE Communications Society, but I'm hesitant to intrude on someone else's hard work.

Any thoughts or suggestions would be very welcome, and again - thanks very much for your help.

Mdrozdowski (talk) 12:16, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Tag removed. Happy editing!  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 12:25, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I also added a link from Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers to IEEE Cloud Computing. GoingBatty (talk) 12:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you both very much for the help and getting back to me so quickly. I really do appreciate it. Mdrozdowski (talk) 12:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Need advice
draft was rejected and I made certain improvements, your comments?--Vin09 (talk) 10:00, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * They are just saying that you should "re-write" and not copy anything. If you have copied anything you have to quote it.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 10:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of wikipage Test Environment Management
Hello OccultZone, I had created my first wiki page today which unfortunately got deleted even before i could show it to my team mates. The page was - Test Environment Management and I think it may have been viewed as an advertisement in error.

Here are a few reasons why I had created it --
 * This is a valid subject of interest to many people in the IT industry.
 * I could not find a wiki page dedicated to this topic.
 * This subject is still in an evolving stage and inputs from other wiki users would help to make the knowledge on this topic stronger.

Please note that the article created is NOT for advertisement purposes and there is no reference to a product / company / person being advertised. If there is any particular area in the article that needs to be edited, the wiki-editors should be provided a chance to edit it and make it better.

Please suggest what changes would be needed to have my page restored.

Thank you. (TechRem (talk) 13:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)).
 * We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Test Environment Management, you may have a conflict of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 13:51, 12 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the suggestion. Please let me know if i can modify the article contents and re-submit the page again or is there a different process to do that?

Thank you TechRem (talk) 06:55, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Make sure your subject is notable enough.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 06:57, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Arabic article list
Thanks for the notice! If you are interested I have a list here: ar:مستخدم:WhisperToMe/SortedList.

LGBT topics are lacking on the Arabic Wikipedia so that would be very helpful! WhisperToMe (talk) 15:16, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * It is because they are deleted for no reason. Their summaries on the main page looks like talk page, "I knew that this is incorrect, so I would say".. Highly imbalanced.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 15:19, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Do you know of any article titles of these deleted pages so I can cross-check them with the list? An admin could take a look and see. Also, one way of avoiding this situation is to have a copy of a draft on your userpage, so we know what the article looks like. WhisperToMe (talk) 15:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * You are a admin on arabic wiki as well? And not really, just observed a few. I usually have a watch on a number of wikipedia. Just contribute more here.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 16:00, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm not an admin on the Arabic Wiki, but I may find someone who is who can help if need be WhisperToMe (talk) 16:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Breaking things
. You are moving projects outside bannershell. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

you broke an image. This could lead to accidental image's deletion. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:04, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * 1. No idea about the first one, It is a bug? Because it happened only in 1 of my 69 edits that I've made.
 * 2. A few images have been moved from '.JPG' to '.jpg', Maybe this one was left, can you rename the image? ".jpg" is more frequent than '.JPG'.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:06, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

I just had it again, posted on Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Bugs.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:20, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The problem is that WPBannerShell is a redirect. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:24, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Less than 1,000 pages with this redirect. The custom module catches them and bypasses the redirect. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:30, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Now 800 left. I may do the rest later. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:46, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * That's nice. Keep it up.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:47, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Related AWB bug fixed. It will be available on next release. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:55, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * When it is going to be released?  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 15:00, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * No idea. We try to release every 1-2 months. -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:09, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I emptied the list to ensure that we won't have more complications with this banner till next release. -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:49, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * is not working, you think it is reportable?  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 15:55, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

inside table. -- Magioladitis (talk) 17:38, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing it, I think that article is currently going some under some construction, though it has links outside.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 17:42, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

It works for me. -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:17, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Email me then? Because I cannot see anything, it shows "0 results".  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 16:57, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

You broke almost all categories on the page. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:51, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Seemingly there were hardly any categories, and mostly URLs, I've removed the URLs, and wikilinks that were added under category. I know that 2 are redlinks now, but the page creator can make them anytime once h/she will resolve the dispute.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:55, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Watch out!. -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:44, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Rare. Fixed it for you. -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:47, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Watch out! If this stayed too long, two images could have been deleted as unused from Wikipedia. -- Magioladitis (talk) 17:29, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot, and it was really a new thing to me.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 02:26, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Do not rely on bots giving warnings to you. Bots usually issue a certain amount of warning per minute and they miss a lot of warnings. So please be double careful, especially when working with images. -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:50, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Society in the Joseon Dynasty
Hi! I am in the process of writing the article. Hence the under construction template on top. No need to place maintenance tags on it. Of course there are empty sections. I'm not finished yet.... Teemeah 편지 (letter)  07:37, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Your article looked good enough to me. Reviewed it.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:43, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank You
Thank You for the message you left me. I am new to wikipedia, and appreciate any things I should read or rules I should be aware of. Thanks 194.217.96.40 (talk) 10:58, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Review
Transport in Andhra Pradesh. Also, pls tell me how to post request for new maps?--Vin09 (talk) 11:03, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphan
To remove orphan should we introduce categories?--Vin09 (talk) 15:29, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Just link your article some other wiki page.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 15:51, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Linking means like see also section?--Vin09 (talk) 15:53, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * If it fits no where else.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 15:57, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Pls check Sapthagiri Express once--Vin09 (talk) 16:05, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Linked on Trains of South Central Railway (India), and tag removed.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 16:09, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Map
You haven't replied me. Need info on requesting maps like road, rail of a state.--Vin09 (talk) 04:12, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * You can create a map on any .svg creator, there are number of softwares available online.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 04:13, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Removal of ‘Switzerland-actor-stub’ regarding Karin Lesch — and a question about a possible photograph.
Dear OccultZone,

I thank you kindly for taking the time to edit the first Wiki page I have ever created. Though I did it to the best of my abilities — using similar pages as an example — I still shouldn't care to proffer it for consideration as a Featured Article. (I was a good student, but my formal education was limited to a UK Senior Sixth Form College, i.e. the US equivalent of nothing more than (full) high school, whereas so many Wiki editors are, by stark contrast, both erudite and lettered).

Coming to the first point, finding nothing on the subject in English, I merely pieced the page together from translations of various German Wiki articles, thus their semi-internal German Wiki links, with a few external links to largely brief German articles from which I included translated information as well. (My late mother was Swiss, and at one time I was conversant in German). However, I certainly didn't — and still don't — consider it much of an article at all, hence my inclusion of the ‘Switzerland-actor-stub’ in hopes more-knowledgeable, well-informed editors might add to it. However, if you feel it doesn't qualify as a stub, I am flattered, and can only thank you once more, but again, my reason for placing it there was because I don't consider it a bona fide article, but I defer to your opinion on the matter.

On the second point, if you would have the time to advise me. I'm not an American, and don't live in the USA. I remain a British Citizen, however I emigrated long ago, and I believe I'm subject, in my adopted country, to copyright laws 50 years p.m.a.; this providing there was not a third-party copyright filed in addition. As such, I have two screen shots, which I, myself took of the subject, actress Karin Lesch, from one of her 1973 East German films. The larger is not of any great size, 500 by 700 pixels, but I would think need be scaled down to about 180 by 225 for use beneath her name, in the framed biographic summary to the right as per Wiki format on articles about a person. I regret I am just an old man who is all at sea when it comes to the complexities of what is or is not permissible vs a clear infringement of copyright. One could assume in this case, it might be permissible, however not in Wikimedia Commons, and so I don't exactly know where in English Wiki to up-load it, but more importantly whether it does, in fact, fall under ‘Fair-use’ ... ? ... although it appears to me to meet all Wikipedia Non-free content criteria.

Any guidance you could give me with regard to this would be much appreciated.

Thank you again,

Yours sincerely,

Chris

Christian Gregory (talk) 07:19, 14 June 2014 (UTC)


 * P.S. I further thank you for your creation of a ‘Discussion Page’ for this article, which I only discovered now.  Cheers! Face-smile.svg Christian Gregory (talk) 19:29, 14 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi, Occult Zone asked me to take a look at your comment to see if I could offer any help regarding image use on en.wiki.


 * About the two screenshots of Karin Lesch. Since she is still alive, and assuming that the East German films are copyrighted, the only way to upload them and use them here would be under the non-free content conditions, Wikipedia's stricter interpretation of the American "fair use" legal concept.  Each image would have to have a separate non-free fair use rationale for each article they appeared in.  You could probably use one of them in each article about each East German film - if we have articles on them - and you might be allowed to use one in the article about her, although activist editors who patrol that area of Wikipedia are known to interpret extremely strictly the requirement that if the person is still alive, it's technically possible that a free image might become available.  (Ironically, if she dies you're in a better position to use one of the screenshots in her article.)  It's still worth trying, though.  The worst that could happen is that the image is removed.


 * Any images used as non-free should be under 300px in width - you don't necessarily need to go down to 180px. Generally biography portraits are displayed at around 220px.


 * You are correct that your screenshot would not be acceptable to upload to Commons, which does not accept copyrighted material under any cirmcustances.


 * I hope this is helpful to you. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on my talk page.  Best, BMK (talk) 20:41, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Archive
Pls see my talk page, the archive box suddenly became so long and some unknown list appears. Whereas I have only 1 page in archive.--Vin09 (talk) 16:38, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Replacing archive box may help.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 04:07, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

A bit too soon to orphan-tag the Ramon Barba article?
Hi. Not to be argumentative, but you marked the Ramon Barba stub an orphan literally within ten minutes of the page being created - which is to say, of course, before it was humanly possible to wikilinks from other pages, unless those pages already had redlinks. (Not everybody creates pages via redlinks. Especially if we're talking about scientists in highly specialized fields.) I was just creating the article and starting to look for sources by which to beef it up, and the tagging got me a bit flustered. Would it be okay if I asked for perhaps a little breathing space next time? :D Thanks. - Alternativity (talk) 17:40, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I've categorized though, if you don't find link anywhere, you can add your page on List of Filipino people. You can remove orphan tag after that.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 17:45, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh, I already wikilinked at least one article. I made the article because he had just been proclaimed a National Scientist of the Philippines, so a link there was going to almost be automatic.  And then there's the list of UPLB alumni, and... I dunno if there's a list for the University of Hawaii's East West Center. You just beat me to the draw. Hehe. :D I usually don't remove the tags other people put on the articles I made, as a matter of delicadeza (Oooh, that cultural trait should have its own wiki page), but it seems you're giving me permission to do it myself? :D Thanks. - Alternativity (talk) 17:56, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Good, and remember not to add {Talkheader} on any talk page that has no conversation, read WP:TALK.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 18:00, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh! That one I did not know. Noted from now on. Thank you. - Alternativity (talk)

Biography of J.M.Rhodes: This person died in 1976
Hi OccultZone, thx for contributing to my latest article, the biography of James Melvin Rhodes. Most aditions you've made seemed kind of automatic and for this I'd like to thank. There is however for the 2nd time a category link "living people" added, which is in that case, since the person described died in 1976 (s. biographic data) not applicable! So I'll remove it a second time and would like to ask you to NOT put it in again (suppose, it was just automatically done). Thx a lot and keep up the good work. Matchtime (talk) 18:17, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Best is to never write "age:60" in your first sentence and add the "1976 deaths" if you have also added a "1916 births", for categories.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 18:19, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * @OccultZone, thx for this hint, quite valuable! I actually created this part from another example, but yeah, it makes sense to me. Good and helpful learning effect. Enjoy the weekend. Matchtime (talk) 18:28, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and you too!  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 18:29, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

 * Thank you Face-smile.svg  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 19:31, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Need info
Notice: This file was flagged by a bot (User:Fbot) for transfer, so also remember to check if file is usable before moving it to Commons. on some pictures I noticed in some pages. Are they non free/or should be removed?--Vin09 (talk) 05:09, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * It is not controversial to use them, unless you need special permission from the uploader.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 06:55, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Please give some time before tagging new pages
New editors may consider tagging a page they just created as biting. Even when tagging is correct. I know there is no strict rule for tagging but since you edit manually try to slow down this. This is a rule I try to follow too. -- Magioladitis (talk) 06:34, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Some do, some new editors also consider it to be a good sign. I will probably tag after 2-3 days of creation. But then the question would be, "which tag?", I think orphan is the hardest non-controversial tag to understand.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 06:52, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Data point: when you tagged Drafting film as uncategorized when I created it, I found it encouraging, but I would have found it even more encouraging if you'd categorized it instead :). But I'm not a new editor, so my perspective may not be typical of the newbies it's most important to not bite. Kragen Javier Sitaker (talk) 10:38, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Many people around for tagging as well as for categorizing. There are hardly any pages that remain uncategorized as almost all of them are using "Hotcat". I mostly add categories on those articles that I've reviewed.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 10:43, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I didn't mean my comment as a complaint! Kragen Javier Sitaker (talk) 23:50, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * True. I get a lot of questions about it. Still I think it is a very useful tag. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:08, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes it is very important one. No 2nd opinion there.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:10, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Templates_for_discussion/Log/2014_June_14 after a page was tagged. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:28, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * That is called WP:BOOMERANG. We can see that the template is heavily supported by most of the members. I have still left one comment.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:36, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I have to whole hardheartedly agree with Magioladitis. Wait before tagging.  If you want to do new articles, turn tagging off.  I'm also getting tired of seeing you tag an article, but not fixing anything else.   I saw an article that contained a user signature, two sentences and 3-4 other errors.  You slapped 4 tags on it, but did nothing else.  You are doing upwards of 8 articles a minute and there is no way that you are doing nothing else except press save.  Perfect example is this.  You didn't look at what you did.  The defaultsort was wrong and you added the wrong name to persondata.  You didn't add the full birthdate.  You keep saying you are going to correct this, but don't.  Bgwhite (talk) 09:08, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I changed the defaultsort and persondata, thanks for pointing. I also informed BrownHairedGirl about it, the creator of this article and she has realized too. I think you might be referring to a PRODED article, I don't really think that I will be editing the PRODED articles, sometimes I used to reach to them after watching from the program, but it can be done without editing too. I added that I won't be doing that on any PROD articles anymore, or if it is necessary, I will be avoiding the orphan tag. I will tag probably after 2-3 days. Although I can still use other tags such as 'unsourced', 'refimprove' with the program. Also the full birth date on James Rooke (MP) is still missing. We've only got the years. Before today I never knew that tagging can be disabled. Thanks  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 10:18, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

I hope you have read all responses on TFD, and including that one by Lugnuts.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 13:57, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I noticed. Thanks. On the other matter: Bgwhite is right. You do not pay attention. So please disactivate Auto-tagger. I wrote you before: We need more pair of eyes and less automatisation. We need more editors to check their edits, to report problems and less bot-like editors. If we are more we can distribute the tasks better and slow down our editing rates. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:52, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes I had notified that I didn't knew any deactivation of Auto tagging, but today I got to know. I have done about 62 edits after that, no tags :-) What I will do is, I will maintain the list. Tag days or week/(s) after.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 14:56, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. We all get wiser every day. -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:23, 15 June 2014 (UTC)


 * I haven't been told that I should not tag newest articles. I can, but Bgwhite and Magioladitis have requested that they don't prefer doing with it AWB.. If I want, I can actually tag recently created articles, but even without using AWB for that.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 11:03, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

9 minutes after it was created. I did not say anything AWB on my comments above. -- Magioladitis (talk) 11:20, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I know what you mean, I am trying something with common.js right now.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 11:22, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The problem is the following: If the page was already a tag, bot won't be able to remove unless the page has 3 instead of 1 link. This is why I raise my concerns. -- Magioladitis (talk) 11:25, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Which bot. I think AWB removes underlink, deadend, stub, orphan and uncategorized once they are well enough.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 11:28, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * AWB adds orphan when no incoming links, removes then 3 or more incoming links. 1 and 2 incoming links need user attention. -- Magioladitis (talk) 11:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Your Opinion
Can you have your opinion about a discussion at page.--Vin09 (talk) 06:57, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I would like to know that what sources he is using. Sometimes if the source is not reliable you have to stick to the last claim, and specifically add the year.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:05, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * On Tiruchirappalli page, correct info was clearly stated on the page itself. And the user stated reference is newspaper info, need to slide for second picture on that page.

Government of India genuine source is .--Vin09 (talk) 07:11, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Persian people
Thanks. That was the last straw. Blocked indefinitely as clearly not here to build the encyclopedia. He's got a sock as well, see Sockpuppet investigations/Farshidvard. Dougweller (talk) 09:49, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Nicely done, I've got at least 2 reports pending on SPI, any input from SPI can be expected only after a few days or weeks. This user has been blocked and page allows only confirmed users. I guess it is good sign for now.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 09:55, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

WP:AN
There is a discussion at WP:AN to which your input might be helpful. Dennis Brown &#124; 2¢ &#124; WER  13:08, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and before I had this message, I had the ping from you.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 13:14, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I couldn't resist the close on that. ;) Dennis Brown &#124; 2¢ &#124; WER  13:30, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphan page fixed
Per your reco/orphan tag placed on the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coupon_Cabin, I located two existing mentions on other wikipedia articles and linked them to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coupon_Cabin. Page no longer orphaned. Thank you! Mtrent (talk) 14:31, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Tag removed.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 14:34, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bill Hamrick (William Grady Hamrick III), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carrollton High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Nizamabad page
Please have a look at this Nizamabad, Telangana. I have already undid once, another user removed content without any summary and reference. Thank you.--Vin09 (talk) 09:29, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * You can revert again, and warn the editor on their talkpage.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 11:00, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

hello
finally created this one. Please have a loook. Thanks Hidzoko (talk) 14:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Possible sock
I've been dealing with a sock master that generally hits Indian cinema and TV plus video games. There's an account that I'm a bit suspicious about, but the articles they are editing have been edited earlier by socks of a different account, Sockpuppet_investigations/Nitishkumartn, that you just added an SPI about. The new account is. I'm not convinced they are TJK, but they might be a Nitishkumartn sock. If you have a chance, would you mind taking a look at their contributions and see what you think? Thanks! Ravensfire ( talk ) 15:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for informing me. At least we can say that none of these users(suspect socks) have provided edit summaries for their edits. I am going to look into that one. There are probably more. Yesterday I had told Callanecc that he should endorse CU, but he hasn't responded.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 15:08, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Script/Automated tool??
Are you using any type of script or automated tool to make this type of edits???  J i m Carter  ( talk ) 13:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for observing, it is a script and it is not even semi-automated.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 13:50, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Can you please tell me how to use that script?? We have thousands of unassessed articles at WPIndia. Thanks,  J i m Carter  ( talk ) 07:46, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * No doubt, I will give you the script, on your sandbox or userpage if you want me to edit any. Let you know the instructions, through here or email. Whatever suits you.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 11:20, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * You can drop the script here. I don't have problem if you provide the instructions here. Thanks,  J i m Carter  ( talk ) 13:33, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Done.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 14:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much OccultZone. And keep up the good work! Happy editing. :)   J i m Carter  ( talk ) 20:35, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/1973 CECAFA Cup
I want to accept that one. But how I can? Other than editing template. Thanks a lot.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 11:28, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I think the final choice about which hook or which ALT goes to the nominator, Matty.007.--Storye book (talk) 11:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Stubs
There is no rule saying that pages with more than 300 characters are not stubs. Remark: AWB arbitrarily claims that pages under 300 characters ARE stubs but there is no symmetry on this definition. AWB arbitrarily claims that pages with more than 500 words are not stubs. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:24, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Check also Stub. Under this view this is not a correct edit summary at least. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the appreciation above, WP:STUB says that people have their own views about stub, some people view 1500 characters(Dyk rule) to be legible, and some view 250 characters. Although I have made my own thought that 300 characters(excluding refs, categories, templates, etc) are enough. I've collaborated with this scheme on AFC, and with the editors including DGG. Basically, once the article provides you enough idea about the subject, it becomes start. Just like we had discussed before.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 14:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

 * Thanks! I am just making lists and busy with other wikipedias these days.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 12:56, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

COI issue
How are you occultzone? What can we do to this COI policy violator? he created this article: Jeffrey Umland for either himself,his friend, relative or lectura.I suspected him of COI because he claimed to be a student of bufallo university new york. Where he also claimed that the subject obtained his degree. Although I had just tag the article with the COI template(Wikicology 08:11, 22 June 2014 (UTC)). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikicology (talk • contribs)
 * Yes you can take advantage of WP:COIN, you can also tag the article with COI template.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 08:23, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Tourism in Mauritius
Hello, i wish to write more about tourism in mauritius, because they have written very few things about tourism in mauritius. May i? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ritishdsp (talk • contribs) 12:31, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes you can write, good luck.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 12:35, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Regarding "anti-Korean POV"
126's phone here. I'm on my lunch break now and won't be able to reply in full until tonight. But basically, as I already said on ANI, he is a SPA whose only reason for editing Wikipedia is anti-Korean POV. It's difficult to pick out concrete examples since every single one of his edits has been (a) removing references to Korea in articless on Japan, (b) removing references to Japan in articles on Korea, (c)edit-warring with (equally and occasionally more disruptive) Korean nationalist editors, (d) minimizing Korean input in articles on Sino-Koryo-Japanese conflicts, and (e) accusing everyone who disagrees with him of being a Korean nationalist. This last. This last point is particularly irksome for me because I'm a Japanophile who lives and works in Japan, and basically couldn't care less about Korea.

I'll give the diffs on ANI when I get home. I made a list back in February when it became apparent he was not here to build Wikipedia. When I mentioned this fact he suddenly disappeared for several months. I'm sure this was just a coincidence, though.

182.249.240.27 (talk) 03:53, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Good luck, and have a good lunch.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 03:55, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you OccultZone
Thank you for reverting the edit which I made in Rape in India. I missed out the notable incidents section. Thanks for pointing it out.--Commons sibi (talk) 12:24, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * You are welcome, next time you can just expand the already written text if you have got more information.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 12:26, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi OccultZone, Thanks for reviewing Daniel R. Gernatt, Sr. and rating it B class! I appreciate your efforts! Daniellagreen (talk) 15:35, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * You are very welcome.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 06:49, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Dealing with sock IPs
Some sock IPs are continuously edit warring in Pakistan and weapons of mass destruction and Economy of Pakistan and making pro-Pakistani nationalist edits. Can you give me some clue to deal with them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by I.Bhardwaj (talk • contribs) 20:17, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * You need solid evidence and not just assumption. Consider adding your report to WP:SPI if there is any.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 06:50, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

I think there's solid evidence, look at the history of Pakistan and weapons of mass destruction and Economy of Pakistan, what do you suggest? I.Bhardwaj (talk) 20:09, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

 * Thanks!  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 12:14, 24 June 2014 (UTC)