User talk:Oceanne4564

CS1 error on Education in Bangladesh
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Education in Bangladesh, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Oceanne4564&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1175039343 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:46, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Education_in_Bangladesh&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1175039343%7CEducation%20in%20Bangladesh%5D%5D Ask for help])

No political agendas and non-neutral content allowed
Hi!

I have noticed that you recently made some edits to the Education in Bangladesh article.

First of all, your edit talks about the development of women in Bangladesh's education sector. Nothing wrong with this statement. But, the thing here is that you made that edit in the current issues and areas for development group. Here, in this sector, we only talk about issues (by that I mean actual issues. Neutral from political ideologies.). Since the statement did not mention any sort of issues, the edit of yours was removed.

Now, let's go to the neutrality side. Neutrality is one of Wikipedia's strongest policies that must be maintained at all costs. This means that statements must be rational and logical, free from political views and other stuffs that break neutrality. Although, your edit itself did not contain any sort of break in neutrality, the description of your edit contains statements that break neutrality that are motivated by political ideologies or similar things. In your description, you made statements of Islamic veiling, labelling it as something that segregates women from the society and hampers women's empowerment. I don't know how you would explain this statement of yours, but good luck trying to explain how a woman covering her hair or face somehow hampers their empowerment and rights, especially when they are wearing it themselves because more than 94% of Bangladesh's people find importance in religion and it isn't Iran where women are forced to wear it by law! There is nothing wrong with veiling. It doesn't hamper their rights or empowerment and it doesn't segregate them from the society. It is literally just a person covering her face or just hair. Yeah, sure, forcing women to wear it is a violation of their rights. But, that doesn't make veiling an inherent violation of women's rights, force is a violation! And, don't be untransparent, narrow minded and possibly narcistic. Religious women who prefer modesty are a thing just like religious men who prefer modesty. There exists both religious and irreligious people. Some prefer modesty, some prefer immodesty. That is their thing. There are Muslim women who are religious and modest by choice. Labelling veiling as an obstacle of women's empowerment is illogical because it's not an obstacle and it is not a violation of any sort of rights, especially out here in Bangladesh where women have the right to not wear it. Infact, laws that force women to not wear it are violations of their rights because Muslim women modest by choice aren't able to do what they choose to do. Your description was most like heavily motivated by Islamophobia, imperialism and especially Hijabophobia. This statement was not based on any sort of proper logic, and the claims are absolutely absurd and are motivated by hateful ideologies and views. Do not even try to argue about this.

If you keep on breaking neutrality like this, you'll probably be blocked from editing this article and if you do this in many other articles, you'll probably be unfortunate enough for your account to be blocked entirely from editing any articles on Wikipedia.

Regards

Asaduzzaman Khan Shahriar (talk) 13:21, 30 September 2023 (UTC)