User talk:Oceanski

Hey! It's Ben. I'm looking forward to this class! See you tomorrow Rick.james850 18:18, 24 January 2011

Hello from CMTuckerCMTucker (talk) 19:23, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Good day from Carl
Good morning from Carl Anderson (User:carl67lp). 25 Jan 2011 11:20 EST —Preceding undated comment added 16:19, 25 January 2011 (UTC).

Hi from QQ
Hi, Sandy! How was your weekends? I really enjoyed the NBA game~ See u tomorrow!qiaoqi 02:59, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:34, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Mentor
Of course I'll be your mentor!! :) Tell me how I can help you and where would you like to start?  D u s t i *poke* 23:04, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi from Shan
Hi. My name is Shan Yang. I am also in TC 850 course. See you tomorrow! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suisse514 (talk • contribs) 02:35, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm getting there..
Hello! I have never edited Wiki pages before so this is kind of interesting. I think I close to getting it. Looking forward to what this class will have us do. Talk you tomorrow! Football1502 (talk) 03:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC) Football1502

Ambassador information
Hi Ocanski! Just a follow up to see how you're faring with the Ambassador program and your workload? A quick request.. I've got to tag your userpage with some information, so could you provide me with the Project you're working with and the class? Thanks!  D u s t i *poke* 06:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Feedback from Johannes M. Bauer
This is a substantive addition to the previous article. Some aspects could be clarified. For example, you write: "However, both the UNE Remand Order and the Line Sharing Orders were remanded" and then in the in the following half-sentence that the Line Sharing Order was vacated. "Remanded" means an issue is sent back to the FCC; "vacated" means an Order is rendered void. The passage may need some clarification.

Your additions covering TELRIC seem to suggest that it is a thing of the past, which would be misleading. TELRIC is still in use, but only for the network elements that have to be unbundled (e.g., local loops). You may want to mention that and also that not all unbundled network elements have been eliminated.

Good start! --JMBauer (talk) 23:30, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Edit: Public interest
1. Added some "references," "see also," and an external link

2. Added the "definition" part

3. Added "public interest & the government"

4. Added "public interest & communications policies"

5. Added one sentence in the "ambiguities" section

Feedback from JM Bauer
These are good edits that improve the entry. One concern I have is that the original entry was on public interest in general but the new addition focus mostly on communications policy. You addressed this nicely toward the end by singling out communications but there may be too much of a communications slant in the earlier parts of the article. Good work, though, overall. --JMBauer (talk) 03:44, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Mentoring
Hi there, Sross contacted me and asked me to take Dusti's place mentoring you (he has apparently permanently retired). It looks like JMBauer is your professor and that this page says that you are creating an article which will be called Telecom Policy? How's that going for you so far, do you have much written? Have you edited Wikipedia before this? It would be extra work for you, but you may step through my Adoption courses if you'd like -- they are a fairly comprehensive overview of how things work. You can find them at User:Banaticus/Adoption if you're interested. Banaticus (talk) 01:31, 13 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I see you have an outline in your sandbox. That's good, it will help you organize your thoughts as you begin writing more.  Banaticus (talk) 19:05, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Broadband universal service


The article Broadband universal service has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * original research / fork of existing articles

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; RHaworth 10:44, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You are writing an encyclopedia article not a student essay. You do not start with definitions - the first time you use a term, you create a link to the article that defines that term. Instead you start the article with a short paragraph that summarises the content. &mdash; RHaworth 22:52, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi RHaworth, thank you for your comments. I did improve the entry based on your comments and then removed after I made some improvements. I don't know how to make an editing summary... could you explain how to make it in detail? Thank you. }} 10:52, 8 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Oceanski, your professor left some interesting comments on my talk page when I contacted him to let him know about the deletion discussion. I would repost them in the deletion discussion, but I think it's something that you need to post yourself, as thinking about how to phrase your response will help cement the differences in your mind and allow you to better concentrate on how to better improve the article. :) 74.100.206.89 (talk) 06:02, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your messages. I am quite surprised to see the deletion proposal. I thought Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopedia- someone creats a new entry, and then others will add on to make it a better one because no entry is perfect. Though it seems not working in that way, I still want to thank you for paying attention to this entry. I will work on it to improve it. }} 21:17, 8 May 2011 (UTC)