User talk:Ocharpen

Beware censorship practiced by the Spanish wikipedia librarians:
So: About: "This article may require copy editing for grammar": This is not true, the truth is that the language used is very scientific, not anybody can question it. About: "This article may be confusing or unclear to readers": This is not true, the truth is that the language used is very scientific, not anybody can understand it. This article may contain original research:" This is tendentious. The article, from premises, well-known in physics and higher mathematics texts, and following the rules of these fields, more or less complex: reach new conclusions, that are worth sharing, with scientifc community.


 * No, you're delusional. Let's go over some of the text you just wrote.  Trust me, your text is just as bad throughout your article.


 * >This article may contain original research:" This is tendentious. The article, from premises, well-known in physics and higher mathematics texts, and following the rules of these fields, more or less complex: reach new conclusions, that are worth sharing, with scientifc community.


 * First, a note on the logic of this paragraph. Wikipedia does not allow original research, period.  This issue is not tendentious.  This is a core rule of the site, see No Original Research.  Wikipedia is not an academic journal. Now on to grammar and spelling.


 * This [it is good grammar to insert a subject here] is tendentious. The article, from premises [I think you mean principles] [removed unnecessary comma] well-known in physics and higher mathematics texts [removed unnecessary comma] and following the rules of these fields, [non-nonsensical-> more or less complex][unnecessary use of semicolon] reach[ed] new conclusions[unnecessary comma] that are worth sharing [unnecessary comma] with [missing "the"] [scientific misspelled] community.


 * Corrected version:


 * This argument is tendentious. The article, from principles well-known in physics and higher mathematics texts and following the rules of these fields, reached new conclusions that are worth sharing with the scientific community.


 * Consider the possibility that, rather being so much smarter than everyone else, you don't write English well. Zabby1982 (talk) 20:33, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

I wanted to apologize for not being as skilled as you on languages. And I can not require you to be an expert like me in physics and mathematics. Inform you that the main article, which apparently you have not read, is more important than the language. Instead of deleting it, they should do the same as you did with the secondary comment you edited.

April 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Renewable energy in Panamá, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sarahj2107 (talk) 21:33, 19 April 2013 (UTC)--Ocharpen (talk) 15:44, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Ocharpen (talk) 23:12, 19 April 2013 (UTC) I will correct it--Ocharpen (talk) 23:12, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Renewable energy in Panamá
Hi, I've noticed that you have added your signature to some of your edits to articles, such as the edit you made to Renewable energy in Panamá. This is a common mistake to make and I have already corrected it. Please do not sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article?. Regards - Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:26, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Renewable energy in Panama


A tag has been placed on Renewable energy in Panama, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:12, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ocharpen


A tag has been placed on User:Ocharpen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:14, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Renewable energy in Panama


A tag has been placed on Renewable energy in Panama requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://challenge.ecomagination.com/home/oceanogenic-power. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Randykitty (talk) 14:24, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Renewable energy in Panama for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Renewable energy in Panama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Renewable energy in Panama until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Acroterion   (talk)   15:02, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Renewable energy in Panama


A tag has been placed on Renewable energy in Panama, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   16:02, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   22:37, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   22:40, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
 * I'm blocking you because your only edits have been to promote your own personal theory on energy creation. Wikipedia is WP:NOT a place to promote your own theories and viewpoints, no matter how interesting or valid you think they might be. This just isn't the right place for that sort of thing. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   22:01, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

I wanted to apologize for not being as skilled as you on languages. And I can not require you to be an expert like me in physics and mathematics. Inform you that the main article, which apparently you have not read, is more important than the language. Instead of deleting it, they should do the same as you did with the secondary comment you edited.
 * Alright. I'm blocking you from editing your own talk page. You show no sign of wanting to edit on anything other than your personal theory and your attitude towards other users has been frankly rude. Wikipedia is not a place to promote yourself and your theories and we will not tolerate you insulting other users just because we won't let you promote your original research. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   00:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)