User talk:Oct2011

May 2011
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to List of predicted dates of the end of the world or similar events. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. StAnselm (talk) 23:13, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

I have attempted to add a prediction for October 2011 onto the list for the end of the world. I have met opposition from others. The blood of the people be upon their hands... may the LORD not forgive them but judge them as enemies. I have sent an email to one of them but never received a response. I have attempted to navigate this endless maze of pious intellectual nonsense so that I might argue their reason for deleting the prediction, but I don’t have the time and it would probably do no good anyway: The confusing maze of “talk”, “edit”, “comment”, and “whatever else” does not make it easy for a new arrival to resolve any misunderstanding, so I’m just going do it here on my talk page.

They say that I have provided no reliable reference, or they impy that I am making the prediction on a whim of my imagination (a strange thing). Well… how about the Holy Bible for a reference!!! How is that for a published reference??? I have about 100,000 words of personal study, based exclusively upon the Holy Bible, on my website that clearly declares October to be of worthy consideration. Harold Camping is on the list and he provides absolutely no information to critique… zero… nothing, and therefore he should not even be on the list!!!
 * I'm sorry that you didn't read or receive the email I sent back to you. In any case, the Bible by itself is not an appropriate source for your end-of-the-world prediction, since most people who study the Bible don't think the world will end in October. StAnselm (talk) 02:28, 1 June 2011 (UTC)