User talk:Octopusemoji

Hi -- I see you changed the image on the Lyn-Z article to a new image File:Lyn-Z.jpg, which was uploaded to Wikimedia commons marked as being your own work.

I can't help but notice that this image is both (a) watermarked and (b) the exact same size in pixels as, and visually identical to, another image already on the web, and (c) lacks the technical metadata that would usually be associated with an original image. It also seems to be from the same series of images as File:Lyn-z-large-msg-123514255894.jpg, uploaded without correct copyright attribution by another Wikipedia user who was also editing the same article today.

Since all images on Wikipedia need to be either correctly licensed, or covered by a fair-use exemption, out of an abundance of caution I've reverted the image back to the previous version. This is unfortunate, because it was much better than the previous image.

However, not to worry! As the author and copyright holder of the original image, you will no doubt have access to the full-resolution, non-cropped, non-watermarked, version of this image, and will be able to upload that to Wikimedia Commons, to show us that you have this original copy, and then we can use that, instead. -- The Anome (talk) 20:38, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

WOW! No need for the sass I've never edited a wikipedia article before