User talk:Oddbodz/Archive1

User:Oddbodz/Aqua Sports Company
I have userfied the article for you at the link above. Please do not move the page back into the "mainspace" without asking the deleting admin. — G FOLEY   F OUR  — 16:03, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank youOddbodz (talk) 17:13, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

The problem with the article is the lack of third-party sources - you have linked to the organization which verify them as a member, but the body of the article is about the facilities, and there is no source for that information. If a magazine or newspaper wrote a profile of the organization, then you could use that information to fill out an article. Otherwise, we don't have any sources to check the article against and thus it fails our policy of verifiability. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 18:56, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Ok, thankyou Oddbodz (talk) 19:11, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Red Link Recovery
Hi there - the project always needs more help. Add your name to the list of participants and dive right on in - TB (talk) 23:49, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Lily (software)
Hello Oddbodz, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lily (software), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to software. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Tikiwont (talk) 12:20, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

2002 Kroger St. Jude International – Men's doubles
In response to the tag saying that this article may not meet the notability guideline for biographies, please note that it is not a biography. It is about an event, not a person. Totalinarian (talk) 16:15, 26 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh, sorry. Oddbodz (talk) 16:16, 26 March 2011 (UTC)


 * It's quite all right. I have removed the tag in question to prevent any risk of the article being deleted unnecessarily. Totalinarian (talk) 16:20, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Humanitarian Law Project
I removed your speedy deletion request because they are notable as a named party in a major SCOTUS case, e.g., Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project. Bearian (talk) 19:50, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome
Wow, after 1.5 years a welcome message on my Usertalk page. I'm impressed. Thx! ;) Oh and btw. I welcome you too, you seem pretty new. ;) TFTD (talk) 15:52, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

NOtoAV
Since I still believe that the article is redundant to the main article about the planned referendum, I have now made a formal request for it to be merged. (See the article's talk page.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:22, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

I am not edit warring. A conscensus has been reached that the paragraph in question is selective and biased. Please do not reinsert without first making your case on the talk page. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.38.32.171 (talk) 15:09, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

'Many other registered users disagree with me' do they? Haha, nice bluff. You already tried to get the page semi-protected and got told where to go. I believe the exact words they used were: 'Please consider dispute resolution.'  Now, I think that taking that advice and not trying to bully other editors into doing what you want would be the sensible route, don't you?

Now, this issue has been discussed on the talk page and out of everyone that spoke, it was agreed that the article was not fit for purpose and should be removed. Now, if those other 'many other registered users' actually do exist then maybe they would actually like to consider posting on the talk page. Until then, and until you can convincingly refute the accusation that what you've written is biased and selective, then it will continue to be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.38.32.171 (talk) 19:14, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Re: RFPP
It's best not to; though the ip was clearly being disruptive, he wasn't engaging in blatant vandalism, and as such reverting him wouldn't be exempt from 3rr. Someone else has already made the revert, which is the best outcome in situations like this.  Rami  R  07:59, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ridge radio.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Ridge radio.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. We hope (talk) 19:52, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Misidentification?
I believe you misidentified the source of vandalism in these edits. It looks to me like what Kittybrewster did was simply to fix a spelling error in the vandalism - he didn't write it. Clearly, fixing spelling errors in vandalism is suboptimal - it would have been better to remove it - but I just thought it worthwhile to point out that you may have warned the wrong person.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 12:00, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. It was the person below in the edit history who had originaly made the vandal edit. The warninig is no longer on Kittybrewsters talk page and I have warned the vandal user. Thanks for letting me know. Oddbodz (talk) 16:08, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Re: Speedy deletion nomination of Hur man sniffar korv
I renamed the article to its English name "How to sniff sausage" and CSD'd it already. You warned me by accident, the creator was User:Korvigt22.--NortyNort (Holla) 11:40, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Got it, I use twinkle too and I didn't create the page. When I moved the page, it put me as the first editor on the article mistakenly. I usually move non-english titles before a CSD to put the criteria in better context but this is the second time this mistake happened, so I probably won't change the text of a title again, just the text in the article.--NortyNort (Holla) 11:47, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Ok, no worrys. Oddbodz (talk) 11:48, 13 April 2011 (UTC)