User talk:Oddosilv/Cladophialophora arxii/HelloSYK Peer Review

I think you did a great job at making the content of the article concise and detailed. The article is also good that it has a neutral tone to it. The article could be improved by adding some few more points and reorganizing some parts. Overall, I think this is a well written article and I really enjoyed reading about the fungus, Cladophialophora arxii

By adding a date of when the C.arxii was first discovered would make easier for the readers to understand the history of the fungus much more. Also, I think it would be a good idea to mention about Dr. J.A. von Arx with the first point instead of putting it separately.

In section Phylogeny, since the article should be mainly about C.arxii, I think writing about other fungi other than C.arxii is not necessary. I think saying that there are clades 1 and 2 and that C.arxii is included in Clade 2 is sufficient. Explaining what Clades 1 (carrionii-clade) and 2 (bantiana-clade) would also help the readers, who don't know much about mycology

Linking "exopolysaccharide" to its wikipedia page would let the readers know what it is.

Also, Separating the section Clinical Relevance into two subtitles, diseases and treatments, would look much more organized and easier to follow.

I also liked the way you used various references to extract informations. However, I think it would be easier to navigate through the references if you add doi or any other identifier because doi would guide the readers directly to the website. HelloSYK (talk) 14:48, 1 November 2019 (UTC)