User talk:OdellS23/sandbox/The Dipylon Amphora

The lead section was easy to understand and to follow. For the other sections I feel that they need a little more coverage in certain areas, like what an Amphora is or more about the context around it. But the structure looks good in spacing wise though I feel that there could be a bit more added, but the context that is there is neutral in content so good job there. Also, it looks that you have many valuable sources on your article, but I see no citations throughout the article so it’s unclear where you got information where.