User talk:Odetteodile

Guide to referencing
Click on "show" to open contents.

Discussion page
Each article and user page has a discussion tab at the top. Click this to leave comments. Don't leave them in the article itself. Thanks. Tyrenius 13:27, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Susanna Roxman
This article has been deleted as a promotional article which requires extensive rewriting to meet wikipedia standards. Please see also WP:COI an WP:AUTO. Tyrenius 13:40, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Please kindly study the guidelines at the above links. Tyrenius 02:28, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Dear Tyrenius

Thanks for your response. I have read "What Wikipedia is not" and "Manual of Style". I'm still not quite sure what you mean, especially as it's emphasized that the stylistic rules are not inflexible. Could you please be more specific? I'd like to be able to help the writer of the article, supposing that he would be willing to alter anything. As I have mentioned before, he had read several "worthy articles" in the Wikipedia, and used those as templates.

Best wishes

Susanna Roxman


 * Please see WP:COI an WP:AUTO. If you put 4 tildes ~ after your talk page posts it will sign with name and date automatically. Tyrenius 13:45, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, Tyrenius. I have checked both links, but I must say I'm still not sure that I can offer the writer of the article any useful advice. Odetteodile 20:59, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The writer User:Oceanography2007 seems to have lost interest in wikipedia, having made 4 edits in creating Susanna Roxmann. Tyrenius 22:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

The editor of the article is welcome to return to wikipedia him/herself and engage in dialogue in the normal way. I have no message to pass through a third party to them. Tyrenius 23:34, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. You might, perhaps, have told me so in the first place? I'll ask the writer (you say "editor", but I suppose you mean "writer") if he feels up to discussing these matters with you. As I mentioned, he has been feeling very low, sad and angry because the article was deleted. He is a professional critic, widely published, and unaccustomed to having his work "censored" -- his own expression, of course. I wouldn't have chosen it, myself. Best,

Sorry, didn't add the tildes! odetteodile 25 June 2007