User talk:Odiaweb contributor

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!) Hello, Odiaweb contributor, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Be Bold!
 * Learn from others
 * Be kind to others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us a bit about yourself
 * Our great guide to Wikipedia

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type  on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes ( ~ ); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 02:04, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Hello, I'm Fylindfotberserk. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Archita Sahu seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Do not add WP:POV content like "She is the best heroine", etc.  Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

But what if it's a fact? It's a very open truth that this actress is the top heroine since 10years plus. Her popularity has to reflect in the wiki page as well! Since u have undone my edit, I would request you to reflect the fact that I want to add, in the wiki page as per the allowed way. Please add it. Odiaweb contributor (talk) 17:47, 12 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks for asking. Wikipedia is neutral. Have you seen any Featured or Good article e.g. Kareena Kapoor write something like she is the top Hindi actress? Secondly, if she is one of the most popular actresses, we need reliable source for that, even then we need to watch the words otherwise it will be WP:PUFF. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. Can u mention which are considered as reliable sources? As I have added a citation from Outlook magazine which is a very trusted news portal of india Odiaweb contributor (talk) 18:08, 12 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Obviously Outlook is reliable. That's why I kept it. But, as I already said, we do not write phrases like "Sahu is the No. 1 actress in Odia film industry", "popular", "successful" and other adjectives even if that is reliably sourced. This kind of wording is frowned upon in an Encyclopedia as per WP:PUFF, also visit MOS:WTW. We already have a sentence "Besides movies, she has recently achieved great success as a model.", so this is covered. I've copy-edited it as "Besides films, she has achieved success as a model" to remove puffery. Surf through more filmstar profiles of all film industries, you'll understand that way. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:09, 13 December 2019 (UTC)