User talk:Odraencoded

September 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Zettai ryōiki has been reverted. Your edit here to Zettai ryōiki was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/zettai-ryouiki) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:43, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Re: "Peachification"
Hi, I reverted your edits in good faith on Bowsette due to the fact that "ピーチ姫化" doesn't actually appear to be in any of the Japanese news articles discussing the character at all nor any of the media: closest I can find are just two niconico videos with the term. I can't seem to find any form of credits page for Japanese with Anime nor another use of it on wikipedia to prove reliability?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 10:42, 29 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The article uses a number of Pixiv illustrations as reference, some of which do contain the term ピーチ姫化 in either the tags or the comments. The term can also be found on twitter. The Pixiv dictionary had an entry for the term, but it has been deleted. The NicoNico dictionary also has an entry for the term. These dictionaries, which handle fandom terms, are user-edited, so I assumed I couldn't cite them in Wikipedia just like I couldn't cite KnowYourMeme, but the term indeed exists. Odraencoded (talk) 18:19, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Best we can do then is keep an eye out and see if a reliable source does mention it more directly. It's similar to how I can't mention Rule 63 even though the character definitely qualifies for it, because nothing's really mentioned it for once.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:44, 29 September 2018 (UTC)