User talk:Oemong

January 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Leonardo da Vinci was changed by Oemong (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964504 on 2013-01-14T10:32:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:32, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Leonardo da Vinci with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mediran ( t  •  c ) 10:51, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2013 Ghouta attacks. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. made both sides appear to accuse themselves. That is dubious for the topic of this article, and contrary to what is in the numerous sources for the article. Boud (talk) 10:11, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * It appears, from your later edits, that this was not vandalism, it was rather failure to properly check the result of your edit before saving. My apologies for the accusation. We all make errors! Boud (talk)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at 2013 Ghouta attacks. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

Your most recent revert that I noticed was. Please start a section on Talk:2013 Ghouta attacks to discuss the issue and obtain consensus among the editors. Boud (talk) 15:58, 28 August 2013 (UTC)