User talk:Oeoi/Archive 1

July 2015
Hello, I'm 2601:188:0:ABE6:B53D:47CE:83E6:3C5F. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2601:188:0:ABE6:B53D:47CE:83E6:3C5F (talk) 14:37, 26 July 2015 (UTC)


 * My apology--I misconstrued your edit and its intent. Cheers, 2601:188:0:ABE6:B53D:47CE:83E6:3C5F (talk) 14:39, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Musket


The article The Musket has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non notable school newspaper

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 06:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Labyrinth (game on paper)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Labyrinth (game on paper), Oeoi!

Wikipedia editor Ueutyi just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Definitely a stub, please elaborate, but good article anyways."

To reply, leave a comment on Ueutyi's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination of The Musket for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Musket is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Musket until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 17:01, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of MIT PRIMES


The article MIT PRIMES has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Insufficient coverage in independent, reliable sources to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 17:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Pranav Sivakumar
Hello Oeoi, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Pranav Sivakumar, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''the claim to be the only person to achieve a certain feat (or number of feats) is sufficient for significance. Also, coverage in reliable sources almost always indicates significance. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA'''. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you.  So Why  10:14, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Star dodecagon listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Star dodecagon. Since you had some involvement with the Star dodecagon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed,Rosguill talk 20:11, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Larry Rhem moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Larry Rhem, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Interstellarity (talk) 18:16, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Oeoi! Thank you for your contributions. I am Oeoi and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oeoi (talk) 15:26, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Proposed deletion of Kenneth P. Bogart


The article Kenneth P. Bogart has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP: ANYBIO, lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. The Dartmouth College reference is a primary source."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 01:46, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Larry Rhem concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Larry Rhem, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of 2020 Ontario nuclear incident alert for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 Ontario nuclear incident alert is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2020 Ontario nuclear incident alert until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 15:54, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parabacteroides merdae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anaerobic ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Parabacteroides_merdae check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Parabacteroides_merdae?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Larry Rhem


Hello, Oeoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Larry Rhem".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. kingboyk (talk) 10:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

"BRD algebra" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect BRD algebra. Since you had some involvement with the BRD algebra redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed,Rosguill talk 19:58, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

"Veloga" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Veloga. Since you had some involvement with the Veloga redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed,Rosguill talk 23:28, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

"Diskoteka" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Diskoteka. Since you had some involvement with the Diskoteka redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed,Rosguill talk 19:49, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

"2020 Democratic Party in Florida" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2020 Democratic Party in Florida. Since you had some involvement with the 2020 Democratic Party in Florida redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed,Rosguill talk 19:55, 5 April 2020 (UTC)