User talk:Oerjan

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Nlu (talk) 16:57, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Divergent_series
Thanks for the fix on the stability condition. I'm going to try to make sure the situation is more overt by casting the conditions in both forms. –Dan Hoey 20:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm a little less sure about changing the definition of stability. The two aren't equivalent without linearity.  Are you sure the usual definition of stability assumes that A({c+sn}) = c+A({sn})? –Dan Hoey 22:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * That's what the discussion at Talk:1 − 2 + 3 − 4 + · · · led me to believe. Without it, the argument discussed there cannot be done without regularity.  But as I said, someone should look it up.  I did try to change the sequence definition to match your series definition. --Ørjan 23:01, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=591652307 your edit] to Malbolge may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 ""s and 3 "[]"s and  1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:59, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Clement Ader
Well I think the more Wikis you can make a fool of yoursef on the better! Seriously, spotting the discrepancy in dates was a good catch & I'm very ashamed of the hash I made in correcting it.TheLongTone (talk) 23:54, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Memory space (computational resource) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Memory space (computational resource). Since you had some involvement with the Memory space (computational resource) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:45, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Perfectly acceptable
Your edit summary said, "(Reverting vandalism on absent user's page, hope this is OK)" -- just so you know, this was perfectly acceptable. While editing a user page should be left up to the user, removing vandalism is one of the recognized exceptions to this practice. Happy editing! Etamni &#124; &#9993; &#124; ✓ 10:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

We are both differently correct!
We each looked at different things, EACH of which are wrong! Go figure!! Fiddle  Faddle  00:44, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Hah, so we are! --Ørjan (talk) 00:50, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Solving that one is complex. It cannot be solved by changing the order of the list, nor by a simple explanation, because the mouseover labels come up and confuse the reader. You are 100%% correct with the order of the pictures. I am 100% correct with the order of the labels. Neither of these orders agrees with the list the way it is stated Fiddle   Faddle  00:59, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

winter Ramadan
Only in the Northern Hemisphere, of course, have there not been winter Ramadans since 2010 (Not that polar night's been an issue at any permanent mosques south of the equator AFAIK). Daniel Case (talk) 08:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)