User talk:Of 19

June 2017
Hello, I'm Coasterlover1994. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Bullfighting— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Coasterlover 1994  19:40, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Husan
I gave three reasons why I removed your recent addition. I find it highly inappropriate that you insist on your edit with the blatant lie that "no reason given". In general, please see WP:BRD that if an edit is reverted, the appropriate course of action is to discuss and see if you can garner consensus for it. Debresser (talk) 04:38, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Please also notice that per WP:ARBPIA3, you are not allowed to edit that article, since you have less than 500 edits. Debresser (talk) 04:46, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Please note WP:ARBPIA3, where the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee decided that: "All IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict."

You were already warned about this (above). Please edit less controversial articles for a while. Daask (talk) 22:40, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I was warned by an editor who should not be editing in the area at all. Being warned by a nefarious editor means I am causing them problems; that's good. Of 19 (talk) 03:14, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

March 2019
Icewhiz (talk) 16:17, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

General prohibition
Reminding you that per WP:ARBPIA3: "All IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict.".Icewhiz (talk) 16:20, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * In this case less than 500 edits, since this editor has been on Wikipedia over a year. Debresser (talk) 16:53, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Aren't both of you well known to be some of the most extremely biased editors on wikipedia? You both have long histories of editing to support the Israeli government against the rules of Wikipedia. How can you not feel shame? Of 19 (talk) 17:33, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:NPA please. I merely informed and alerted you to rules in this content area.Icewhiz (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm merely informing you that your conduct on wikipedia goes against the rules, you should stop editing for nationalistic purposes. Of 19 (talk) 19:04, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * No, we are not. Debresser (talk) 19:23, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I didn't expect someone who has been blocked so many times to admit they are well known for nationalist editing. Please don't edit this page or any page anymore. Of 19 (talk) 20:04, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Collaboration
Hello, Of 19,

I've seen some comments you made that cross the line into personal attacks upon other editors. Wikipedia is a collaborative editing project and editing here requires getting along with other editors whom you might have disagreements with or simply dislike. That is natural, that strong-minded individuals clash with those with opposing points of view. But on Wikipedia, we assume good faith on the part of other editors, it is necessary for us all to work together without constant conflict.

I'm asking you to refrain from attacking other editors. If you persist, you'll find yourself facing blocks of extending duration. I know you can cease to attack those you disagree with, it just takes a little willpower. I hope you will choose this route because Wikipedia NEEDS editors with diverse points of view and we'd like to have you continue to edit here. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 03:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you . Of 19, I read your response on Liz's talk page: it is patronizing and uncollegial, and that sentence beginning "thanks for the warning" is a stunning example of a lack of good faith. Please consider this a warning. Drmies (talk) 20:23, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Missing and murdered Indigenous women, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. ''Seek consensus with other editors, you are still misrepresenting sources. I'm going to take a look and see if the text can be modified, but continually blanking and misresenting what is in the sources is considered disruptive editing. '' - CorbieV  ☊ ☼ 18:29, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Missing and murdered Indigenous women, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. tendentious editing, trying to add content that is sourced as disproven by govt inquiry, incivility  Indigenous girl (talk) 00:32, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

T. B. Joshua
Regarding your edits to T. B. Joshua saying he predicted it after the fact is not sourced. So I removed it. Then adding that he didn't contact authories, is not necessary. Most people who predict things don't contact authorities because authorities don't take predictions seriously. Preachers, ministers predict things every day - going to the authorities is not part of what they do. Thanks for trying.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 21:05, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Brazil COVID-19 Recoveries
Please do not remove the number of recoveries. I could not find the latest reference to the new number, but other databases [eg, https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6] also use the same value. If this value is proven to be wrong, we will correct it later. --Hagnat (talk) 23:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

I believe I went too far but my dislike of antisemitism may be biasing me about what percent of that was too far
Please tell me what parts were offensive, disinformation and/or hate otherwise I will not know how much of that you objected to. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 21:10, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Considering the racist tinge to your rant, I doubt you care about other forms of discrimination like antisemitism, but it is clear you are in favour of disgusting ideas such as nations expanding through violence. If you pick and choose which racist ideas to be against and which to support you become a supporter of all racist ideas by legitimizing their basis. So I would say you are supporting antisemitism through your rants. This is why modern anti-racism movements around the world condemn the racism that other groups face as well as their own group as those who argue for the dehumanizing of Palestinians are arguing that dehumanizing is right and then that it can be used against any people including my Jewish family. Of 19 (talk) 21:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * This got overlooked in my watchlist for some reason, I didn't know you replied till now. Believe it or not my antisemitism is not a front for anti-other things but as all forms of discrimination are wrong then what is the middle ground of not discriminating against anyone? Is it Israel respects the 1949 border from day 1 to forever and doesn't interfere with what happens on the other side? Something else? Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 15:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Didn't Drmies just warn you a few months ago about your tone, Of19? 104.169.24.168 (talk) 01:44, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Reference desk tone
I've removed your reply at the Reference desk/Humanities page, not because there's anything wrong with the opinion you expressed, which is as valid as any other, but because the tone was too belligerent for a page where a lot of newbies hang out, and we don't want to scare them off. Even though your comment was not directed at a newbie, they are still reading and watching. You're welcome to post an opposing opinion there, just keep it about the topic not the other editors there, and please maintain a neutral tone; basically, just word it in a way that will *encourage* a new editor to want to keep reading, rather than the opposite. Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 07:06, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)