User talk:Off!/Archive

Today's Featured Article
Hello. I noticed you added Microsoft Corporation to the March 2nd tomorrow's featured article page. This is not the procedure that is taken to choose articles for the mainpage. If you want to suggest this article for March 2nd, please visit Wikipedia talk:Tomorrow's featured article and place a request there. For now, I have reverted your addition to that page. Thank You. -- SmthManly  / ManlyTalk  / ManlyContribs  22:12, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Thanks for your input at my recent request for adminship. Despite your opposition, I passed with a 91/1/0 vote, and am now a Wikipedia administrator. Please let me know if there's ever any way I can help you - and if I make a mistake, be sure to let me know. My talk page is always open. (ESkog)(Talk) 02:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Microsoft
The edit that you made to this page is both NPOV and removes useful information, if you would like to reframe it edit the article again without removing useful information please do so AdamJacobMuller 09:02, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Isambard Kingdom Brunel (comments on FAC)
I've relooked at the article based on your comments, and hopefully implemented them, thanks for your remarks --PopUpPirate 00:35, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Empty articles
Please do not create new articles unless you have some meaningful content to put into them. Deb 20:06, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * And please, do not recreate them after they have been deleted. You can do that once you have some content to put it in. If you need a page as a draft, you can use a subpage of yours such as User:Off!/Pottum. - Liberatore(T) 20:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Internet Explorer
I was removing the excess template from the page - information that the article is "good" is already on the talk page. -- getcrunk   juice  contribs 13:23, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Microsoft
Please do not revert my edits with no explanation. As per Logos, as I explained in my edit summary, "Logo images should always be surrounded by an image box and be labelled with a caption.". I've returned the box and caption. Kurieeto 13:08, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Injecting unnecessary profanities, racially or sexually abusive comments, or provocative pictures to articles or user pages offends many people. Wikipedia treats such actions as vandalism and blocks people from editing for such repeated vandalism. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 20:23, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place hangon on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 20:27, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


 * All comments that is more than one week old will be moved to the archive. --Off! 21:29, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles as it is considered vandalism. You may place hangon on the page and make your case on the article's talk page if you oppose an article's speedy deletion. Thanks. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 20:31, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


 * All comments that is more than one week old will be moved to the archive. --Off! 21:29, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Warning an IP
Please don't give such a harsh first warning to an anon IP, for the minor and so-easily fixed crime of blanking. --Golbez 21:19, 21 March 2006 (UTC)


 * All comments that is more than one week old will be moved to the archive. --Off! 21:28, 21 March 2006 (UTC)