User talk:Offnfopt

Encyclopedia, sourced to independent refs
MikroTik was not a Wikipedia article but rather a page in the encyclopedia hijacked by fans of this product. It is still awful but less so. Please do not restore content that is:
 * unsourced
 * sourced only to the company's website.

Wikipedia is not a proxy for the product webpage (see WP:PROMO which explicitly says this.

We just recently went through a bunch of drama around OPNsense and Pfsense - this page appears to suffer the same problems. Jytdog (talk) 16:56, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring to retain policy-violating content content
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to MikroTik. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to MikroTik. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. }

Your recent editing history at MikroTik shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 23:50, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SaltStack-logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:SaltStack-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 20 May 2020 (UTC)