User talk:Ogigacz

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Kinu t /c  21:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

A tag has been placed on Oliver Gigacz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please write  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Kinu t /c  21:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Oliver Gigacz
A tag has been placed on Oliver Gigacz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Vgranucci 05:54, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Frank Tetaz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Oreo202 03:03, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

May 2007
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. - BillCJ 06:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

June 2007
The article Nick Speck has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 11:07, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

October 2007
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. MBK004 04:19, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Chris Pahlow
A tag has been placed on Chris Pahlow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- WebHamste r  03:33, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Chris Pahlow
Chris Pahlow, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Chris Pahlow satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Chris Pahlow and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Chris Pahlow during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- WebHamste r  03:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding excessive links to your site
Hi there,

Thanks for helping replace the old dead fullpointsfooty links with the active australianfootball.com links, but please do not bulk add links to current players on your (or your relative, I follow @Gigs on twitter, and that surname isn't that common) website, especially with an incorrect edit summary of "fixed broken links" and when the page on AustralianFootball.com is mainly text from wikipedia. Adding links to external sites that you are associated with can be seen as spamming, which is not allowed. It has evolved that we have links to the AFL club player page and to a stats site, most commonly AFL Tables (rleague.com), as it is always up to date, completely covers the game's full history and rarely if ever is incorrect. Have a read of WP:EL and make sure that you realise that we are here to provide information HERE, not to drive traffic to other sites. Links can be useful as references, or when other sites do things better (such as stats databases are so much better elsewhere than manual text updates here). For older players, links to sites like yours can be OK, especially if there isn't much other info available on them. Regards, The-Pope (talk) 13:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

You appear to be spamming again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.171.99.105 (talk) 11:28, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)