User talk:Ogthor

Please feel free to discuss my Wikipedia contributions here.

RfC: History Student / 207.207.79.202
OK, I'll remove tomf688 from the RfC. If you want to sign on please try to do it within the next day or so, I think they expire after 48 hours without a second signatory

Justforasecond 22:42, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

i've already had run-ins with willbeback and tomf688 so i don't think they'll sign on.

if the rfc expires i'll probably just leave the article.

Justforasecond 17:51, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Restructuring of Japanese American internment
Please see my user page. I have created a subpage with a significant restructuring of the article. I have added a minimum of new text. Where I have removed text, that is noted on a separate subpage, with comments. I'd like input from you and a few others before I "publish" it as a subpage on the article's talk page. --ishu 15:40, 8 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Greetings. I don't know whether you've had time to browse or review the proposed restructuring, but I am considering promoting it to the talk page, since I've received no feedback from the handful of people I've queried.  If you've lost interest in this article, then I understand.
 * If the restructuring is off-point or unnecessary, then I'd rather not start that ball rolling.  But if it's got some merit, I'd prefer to have some support going into the talk, so that we can get the gist of it in.  I'd appreciate any input you can provide.  If nothing else, I'd appreciate if you could just scan the TOC.  Thanks.  --ishu 13:22, 12 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your input. I think those are good to-dos.  I don't know whether you've noticed, but I'd promoted the restructured draft to Talk:Japanese American internment as a subpage.  I think your comments are more appropriate for the main talk page, and I'll move them there soon.  From your user page I can see that you noticed that our friend has returned.  I'm hoping that the restructured article won't open those floodgates again.  Oh well, no reason not to do the right thing.  --ishu 14:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for comments
Your comments to Critic and HS are what I would have liked to have written. Of course, I had no idea what to write, so I'm glad you did. Your comments were fair and balanced (not "Fair and Balanced (TM)"). --ishu 14:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)