User talk:Ogundirans

Reverted links
I noticed that you reverted my links and assumed that I was a spam bot. If you act unually clicked through the link you would have noticed that this was a link to an article about Heather Graham's work in Cambodia. If you have better reason as to why this should not be posted on her wiki, please let me know. Thanks Ogundirans (talk) 05:07, 2 September 2011 (UTC)ogundirans
 * WP:ADV. Nymf hideliho! 05:46, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Response...
I see. Saw the online Observer article is more credible than the one I posted because it was posted by someone that doesn't work for the organization? So if someone that wasn't part of my organization posted the article would that substantiate? Based on your limited response that I'm writing from a bot (I've never heard of a bot that spoke so eloquently), you must have a personal hang up about added links. For someone who has worked in the library sciences, this methodology is faulty. I'm assuming by your number of articles that you reverted you're hoping to be vigilant about maintaining the value and standard of these pages, but just going through your wiki history, it appears that you're reverting valuable articles based on your own internal code which doesn't seem to align with wikipedia's purpose. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ogundirans (talk • contribs) 14:28, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Not sure why you find the first paragraph of WP:ADV (or even WP:LINKSPAM) confusing. It is quite clear to me. Any and all promotion is forbidden. End of discussion. Other unaffiliated people may of course add the links, but not on your behalf. As far as my editing behavior goes, I have 25 000 edits on Wikipedia. I would say my grasp of the guidelines is fairly good. Nymf hideliho! 14:42, 2 September 2011 (UTC)