User talk:Oh, DrPizza!

New Metro West Stations
Firstly re your question as to why Parramatta railway station and Sydney Olympic Park railway station. This was done as at the time there was the possibility that in both locations there would be a common stations there is in Chatswood railway station with the situation to be reviewed if that was not to be the case. Now that we have two locations with separate stations I have altered Template:Sydney Metro stations to allow for these stations with what are considered non standard names. I have also updated Naming conventions (Australian and New Zealand stations) to cover that. Please feel free to expand this if necessary. Also from Template:Sydney public transport I have removed "under planning" and under construction" as they are already covered by the italics.Fleet Lists (talk) 05:45, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Using the copy edit tag
Hi, I have noticed that you are placing the copy edit tag on a great number of pages related to Australian TV. On first glance, these articles appear to be in much better shape than typical articles that are tagged for copy editing, so I am removing the tags. If you spot specific changes that could be made to further improve the articles, I would encourage you to make those edits directly rather than adding a tag to the article. If you want an experienced copy editor to review specific articles, you can make two requests at a time at the Requests page of the Guild of Copy Editors, although we prefer that a good faith effort to improve the article be made by the requester before we work on it. Regards, Tdslk (talk) 17:20, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

WOW!
You've only been here for a month or so, and yet you know so much about Wikipedia's policies and ways of doing things!! That's incredible! I mean, your second edit here has the edit summary: Remove duplicate link per MOS:DL and create consistency with the unlinked nationalisation per MOS:OL. How ever did you learn so much about Wikipedia so quuickly?? Anyway, keep up the good work!!! Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:05, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * So you can read! It's nice to know you do at least have the competence to view user contributions pages. Oh, DrPizza! (talk) 00:26, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Antisemitism. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I see now that the most recent edits you made to Antisemitism were not simply reimposing your originally-contested edit. That having been said, it probably would have caused less disruption overall if you'd raised a discussion on the talk page before reverting BMK in the first place. signed,Rosguill talk 00:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Hey, I recognize that other editors were more hostile than they should have been to your attempts to improve the article, and you're justified in feeling frustrated as a result of this. However, this addition to your user page is not called for, and I'd ask that you consider removing it or toning it down. At a minimum the inflammatory section heading needs to go. signed,Rosguill talk 19:15, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

How do you feel about Village_pump_(technical)/Archive_180?
Since this is archived, you can weigh in at User talk:Naypta, who would be editing the software if this gets the go ahead.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 22:33, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Hawkesbury River railway bridge, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. What you said in that edit summary is unacceptable: "incompetent shit stains at the WMF". Drmies (talk) 18:37, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * removing an owner because it is an old entity doesn't help, at least it pointed at the next entity name which would provide details as to where it went later, OR you could have just put that in instead of blanking the field Dave Rave (talk) 09:18, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Trends in Antisemitic Attitudes in United Kingdom
Template:Trends in Antisemitic Attitudes in United Kingdom has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 16:37, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

"MOS: LINK" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect MOS: LINK and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 26 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Clyde!Franklin! 22:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

"MOS: LINK" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MOS:_LINK&redirect=no MOS: LINK] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:03, 5 December 2023 (UTC)