User talk:OhMyVintageMichaelCole

January 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on The Invincibles (football). Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Guerillero &#124;  My Talk   04:17, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
 * 3) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Guerillero &#124; My Talk   04:22, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for you do not seem capable of editing within our policies, particularly adherence to a neutral point of view. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   04:26, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

LMAO Idiots. How was mentioning Arsenal losing 6 games and only winning 1 trophy in a comparison with Manchester United losing 5 games and winning 3 trophies in their most successful seasons in English football history, complete with sources, vandalism?
 * Well perhaps people haven't fully explained every single one your rule breaches in full detail so I'll try to help you out. In addition to the 3RR violations, you've been inserting weasel words into the article in question therefore breahcing NPOV. You've added irrelevant content which constitutes a clear case of coat-racking. Also calling people "idiots" is a further breach as that constitutes a personal attack.--Shakehandsman (talk) 01:57, 6 February 2011 (UTC)