User talk:Oh Emgee

March 2017
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Office Ally, from its old location at User:Oh Emgee/sandbox/Office Ally. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 22:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for creating that draft page. This is my first wiki article, and I'm just trying to follow the instructions & tutorials so far.Oh Emgee (talk) 22:38, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Office Ally (March 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Office Ally and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  22:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your review. This is my first page submission, and I'll work on trying to find more independent sources. On that note, I used other pages for similar companies (like Practice Fusion or Kareo) as a pattern for the type and amount of sources used, as well as for overall page format. Can you help me understand what ways I'm missing the mark that these Wikipedians hit? Oh Emgee (talk) 22:45, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Office Ally has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Office Ally. Thanks! SwisterTwister  talk  22:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Correct me if I'm wrong, but by: "Comment: Our policies have largely changed recently so all articles from before will be examined and evaluated; however, in this case, the sources are too trivial, wherever published, because the contents are still not significant. SwisterTwister talk 22:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)", you seem to be saying that what has worked, what sources have worked, and any possible other sources about the subject don't matter because the contents (I'm assuming you mean the company the article is about) are not noteworthy? Are there demonstrable means or methods I could use to show otherwise? Oh Emgee (talk) 22:58, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Office Ally has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Office Ally. Thanks! SwisterTwister  talk  23:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Office Ally (April 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Office Ally and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 16:53, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Office Ally concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Office Ally, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Office Ally


Hello, Oh Emgee. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Office Ally".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  16:38, 13 June 2018 (UTC)