User talk:Ohad200180

May 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to The Shadow (1994 film), but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please see WP:ANTAGONIST for more information. DonIago (talk) 13:10, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Transformers: Age of Extinction. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please see WP:ANTAGONIST. Sum mer PhD v2.0 14:32, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Additionally, please stop making pointless, inaccurate changes to numbers in articles and stop adding your opinions of box office results and interpretations of critical reviews. If you are having difficulties understanding, please ask for assistance. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 14:45, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * At Avengers: Age of Ultron, you changed the box office figure from $1.372 billion to $1.373 billion. The source cited give the figure as $1,372,063,254. Rounding the figure to the nearest million, this would be $1.372 billion. I have reverted your change as incorrect. If you do not understand, please ask for clarification. Otherwise, please stop. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 05:44, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Insidious: Chapter 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Insidious: Chapter 2. Sum mer PhD v2.0 13:29, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  15:06, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
hello ,why did i was blocked ,i just contributed to the Wiki ,and one more thing as i do when i always been blocked by users: why the hell my account was blocked ,and until?
 * Persistent disruptive editing according to the above note, which also includes information as to how you can request that your account be unblocked. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 15:02, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Central Intelligence (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 04:52, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Your editing is being discussed here. Please comment. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 23:59, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comparing your problems discussed above ("June 2015") and this edit, it doesn't seem that you've gotten the message. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 15:31, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comparing your problems discussed above ("June 2015") and this edit, it doesn't seem that you've gotten the message. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 15:31, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. 5 albert square (talk) 02:01, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Neil N  talk to me 16:26, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

If you continue to make unsourced edits future blocks will only get longer. --Neil N  talk to me 16:29, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * You recent edit to Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation included more unsourced material. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 03:12, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Drmies (talk) 03:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

when my block will end?
i know that i've done a dispurtive editing ,but when is my block will come to its end?!
 * You have been blocked indefinitely. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 13:25, 31 July 2015 (UTC)