User talk:OhanaUnited/Archive 18

Backlog Elimination Drive Has Begun
Hello, I just wanted to take a moment and announce that the July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive has started, and will run for a month. Thanks for signing up. There's a special prize for most edits on the first day, in case you've got high ambitions. Enjoy! ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 04:12, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

SPI Clerck trainning
Just wondering if we could start the Clerck Trainning soon? -- &#47; DeltaQuad &#124; Notify Me  &#92; 15:58, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Megadeth
i need your help this is a ip user on this article removing a source/content from a article without forming a conserius because i think when you remove a source you should get a consensus first before doing that type of edit. i have ask them do do that a few times but they just keep going back and just removing the soruce/content anyway. first where can we go to sort this out second i know i properly not handle this perfectly either. i do not want to break the 3rr rule which i think i may be close too if i have not already. i do not want to get any one in trouble but one of us may end up in trouble anyway. if you or amyone else you looks into this deems it that way. so any help you can give me or tell me where i can go to get this matter solve that would be great thanks.Oo7565 (talk) 10:23, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

New environment barnstar image
There has been a new image of :

Do you like it? --Extra 999 (Contact me +  contribs) 08:39, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Your unfriendly message
Dear OhanaUnited. I am very puzzled by your recent warning (!) on my talk page. I was active in initiating the discussion about the improvement of the main portals page as you could see here and here. All the improvements I implemented were in good faith and after considerable time allowed for feedback. For the stars in question I did not change the colour, I actually introduced them as a better way of highlighting Featured Portals. The chosen colour was based on the visual effect I found most appealing, but of course anybody can have a different oppinion. I clearly searched for feedback and clearly stated that I have nothing against reverting any of these changes if the community thinks the previous version was better. In this context please be aware that your message appears to be assumption of bad faith and I perceive it as severly unpolite. --Elekhh (talk) 01:02, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I've commented at Elekhh's talkpage. Thanks. -- Quiddity (talk) 02:29, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Did something get edited recently? I'm completely confused as to why you are now describing Elekhh's actions as "verge of reckless" and suggesting incompetence. Check your diffs, and please respond to my note at the bottom of that thread. Thanks. -- Quiddity (talk) 17:40, 12 July 2010 (UTC)


 * It's beyond my comprehension why you continue to throw mud on my talk page. I can't see any justification. I would like to recommend you to read WP:ADM and WP:CIVIL. Thank you. --Elekhh (talk) 04:10, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

User:OhanaUnited/University_Presentation
Hello, Ohana. I just wonder how you collected information for that presentation and page. Can you shed lights on the process? Ktsquare (talk) 20:30, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

FPOC query
At Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:U.S. Roads there is a need for an opinion on the usage of references in portals. The reviewer is asking for the FPOC director to add an opinion on the issue. Thanks in advance,  Imzadi  1979   →   23:12, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

An/I
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Crossmr (talk) 23:55, 14 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I've closed the discussion as a couple of commentators had said that further discussion was unproductive, and I took the view that there was nothing for ANI to do in terms of taking administrative action. However, I'm sure you'll have seen that at least one previously uninvolved commentator described your threat to block as a mistake and an overreaction; Elekhh has asked me whether I would recommend taking the discussion to another forum, and I have said at ANI "I would be very surprised if OU reacted in the same way if your paths crossed again in future after you made an edit with which he profoundly disagreed. ... I think it would be best for all parties to leave this behind them and move on, even if not entirely happy with the way things have gone." I hope this covers matters, but if you wanted to issue any further words of conciliation or assurance, that's a matter for you.  Regards, and happy editing. BencherliteTalk 06:05, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Length of Featured Portal review process
Any thoughts on this bold change of mine? BencherliteTalk 10:14, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Clerk Training
Sorry, I have been out for the past week without internet. Anyway, ready to continue. Any clues for the next step? -- &#47; DeltaQuad &#124; Notify Me  &#92; 04:54, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

SPI Clerk Training
Hello, I saw that you are an SPI clerk. I was wondering if you were open to training users (trainee program), as I would like to join. Cheers, A8x  (talk) 16:57, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, that's no problem. Can you recommend any other users who would be able to train me? A8x  (talk) 17:34, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I am somewhat familiar with the SPI process, I did file this report quite awhile back. However, after a year long wikibreak, do see that the bot is down and things have changed a bit. I re-read the process to re-familiarize myself yesterday, and i think I still have a good grasp on how it runs. A8x  (talk) 17:45, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I did notice that, but I was not aware of the template change. I will read up on the process some more, and also try to find a trainer (as you are taking a break). A8x  (talk) 17:59, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

VPC
— raeky  T  10:28, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Environmental record task force
Hi OhanaUnited!

I was delighted to find the Environmental Record task force project on Wikipedia, which I see you are coordinating: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Environment/Environmental_Record_task_force

I updated the Samsung Electronics page, which used to have an "Environmental record" section, which had been removed because it was too generic. The info I posted is rich with citations, and I hope that others will agree that it's fair to all sides (the company and environmentalists).

Anyways, I plan to do a few more of these for the other electronics makers on Greenpeace's guide to greener electronics list (see http://www.greenpeace.org/electronics ). \

I'd be delighted to hear your thoughts about the current state of the task force, and what you think could help it grow to a point where top electronics brands -- companies and their new products -- all have an environmental record section on their Wikipedia page.

Cheers, Slackr (talk) 09:42, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Requesting Rollback Rights
May I please be granted rollback rights. It will help me revert vandalism especially in biodiversity and military history related articles. AshLin (talk) 04:13, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Medically stabilised. Do put in editing but sporadically, I'm your quintessential WikiOgre :-). Thanks for granting me the rollback rights. I'm an admirer of your wonderful work on GA territory. Do keep up the great work. Thanks once again. AshLin (talk) 04:28, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing it out to me. I hadn't visited it for a long time. It seems to have progressed a lot since then. However I very soon realised my limitations as I am not a professional biologist nor do I have access to adequate scientific articles. Its a great idea. Though I really dont know how we can leverage Wikipedia and Wikispecies to have a better combined experience. AshLin (talk) 14:52, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll keep your last statement in mind. Should I find anything authoritative, I shall surely consider adding it to Wikispecies. AshLin (talk) 03:21, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Portal talk:Renewable energy
Hi. Wonder if you know someone who enjoys working with portals or if you would care to offer a comment here. Johnfos (talk) 17:49, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, things have been going very well with the portal and it is much expanded now. If you get a chance to look in and maybe make a few improvements, that would be great. Thanks. Johnfos (talk) 02:31, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive invitation
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 23:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC).

good?
Does ArbCom really thinks Frank is a suitable candidate for being a CU? OhanaUnitedTalk page 05:24, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

This might make him the best candidate. Some people are so fixated on socks. Socks are really bad, no question. But when there is a content dispute, the validity of the edits is the most important thing. Immature people run to the CU for everything clogging up the CU system. Clogging up the system, the toilet, the sewer, all bad. The CU is great for multiple voting. Frank is not abrasive, one of the problems that Jimbo said in a newspaper editorial that was rampant online, so that's really great. Frank is one of the best people listed, though he's in a tight race for that distinction with LessHeardVanU. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 20:01, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Vote comment
As you commented in the pending closure discussion I am notifying you that the Pending changes/Vote comment is now open and will be for two weeks, discussion as required can continue on the talkpage. Thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 00:07, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Featured Portal Candidates...
... is getting a bit backlogged with candidates that look ripe for promotion (none of them my own, I hasten to add!) Might you be able to stop by soon and take a look? Regards, BencherliteTalk 07:53, 28 August 2010 (UTC)


 * A note on my talk page would have been nice, instead of leaving me to notice your actions from my watchlist: I was following the archival instructions in good faith and it's very disappointing to be reverted like that without any communication from you at all. It's also a shame that you didn't take any action on this candidacy between 4th June and today. Regards, BencherliteTalk 21:32, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, I'd be interested to know why you undid this change, without even the courtesy of an informative edit summary. BencherliteTalk 21:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Portal:Tirana

 * Dear OhanaUnited,


 * Could you help me with my portal about Tirana?
 * Yesterday i started it and all help is welcome :)
 * --Vinie007 16:21, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

move
Hi I'm proposing a move to a contentious title of diaoyu/senkaku islands. Please come to take a look: (Discuss) — Senkaku Islands →  — A recent discussion about the controversial use of Japanese name over a controversial land seems to suggest that neither Senkaku and Diaoyu is predominate common name. Search results show that both names are common, in which the Japanese one yields more results in Google Book search, while the Chinese name yields more in Google News and General Google search. The title was hence moved to Pinnacle Islands following the example of Liancourt Rocks and Sea of Japan, which neglects who administrate and controls the place, but pick up a neutral generally known name. In this case, although the name Pinnacle Islands does not seem to be predominately popular than the rest of two, it achieves the highest degree of neutrality required by wp:name. An admin (nihonjoe) and I have moved the page to Pinnacle Islands for neutrality, but the move is disputed by a user. --Winstonlighter (talk) 05:23, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Pending changes
You seem to be removing PC from many articles. Jimbo has recommended against abrupt action. Is there support somewhere that I have missed for which article this will be removed from and on which it will be kept? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I also noticed that you removed PC from many articles, while a straw poll is being conducted regarding the PC system during the interim period. What is going on? Thanks. Racepacket (talk) 17:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: Thanks
It's nothing, I love to put the template. Tb hotch Ta lk C. 02:25, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Unprotection
Hi again, the last time I went to RFUP for unprotect some pages that were in PC and were semi-protected, though there was not enough vandalism these months. I were asked for request to the protecting admin instead, so I came here for request unprotection for Ultimate Guitar Archive and The Mummy (1999 film), seems like the problems that were years ago are not now. Thank you. Tb hotch Ta lk C. 02:48, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Adopt-a-user reminder
Hello, I have completed a general cleanup of the adopter information page for the adopt-a-user project, located here. During my cleanup, I have removed several inactive and retired users. In order to provide interested adoptees with an easy location to find adopters, it is essential that the page be up-to-date with the latest information possible. Thus:


 * If you are no longer interested in being an adopter, please remove yourself from the list.
 * If you are still interested, please check the list to see if any information needs to be updated or added - especially your availability. Thank you.


 * You are receiving this message because you are listed as an adopter here.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Netalarm (talk) at 03:43, 23 September 2010 (UTC).

FYI
Hi, OhanaUnited, I hope you are doing well. :) You have a response to a comment, at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Cheshire. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 11:20, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Cleanup on SuggestBot regulars
Hi, just stopping by to say thanks for weeding out a couple of users from our list, appreciate you taking the time to do that! Cheers, Nettrom (talk) 20:15, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi again! I'll get the cleanup of users who are inactive taken care of, I can make that easy through some software. Cheers, Nettrom (talk) 20:46, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Drork
Hello, Drork is topic banned from the Arab Israeli conflict and he is also banned from wikipedia altogether. He had no right to create this article where he claims a part of the occupied Golan is part of Israel:, can you please delete it? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 16:41, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

An update from adopt a user
Hi there ! You may be wondering, what have I done to sound the alarm this time? Nothing. I'm messaging you in regards to the adopt-a-user program, which currently has a backlog of users wishing to be adopted. This doesn't make much sense, as we have a considerable list of users offer adoption, so there shouldn't be any backlog. I've begun to eliminate this backlog myself through a matching program, but I need your help to make it work. Of course, adoptees and adopters don't have to go through there, but I believe it helps eliminate the backlog because someone is actively matching pairs.

On the list of adopters, I have modified the middle column to say "Interests." It's easier working with other users that have similar interests, so if it's not too much to ask, could you add your interests in the middle column? For example, if I was interested in hurricanes, computers, business, and ... reptiles? I would place those in the middle column. Counter-vandalism and the like can also be included (maintenance should be used as the general term). The more interests, the better, since adoptees can learn more about you and choose the one they feel most comfortable working with. The information about when you're most active and other stuff can go into the "Notes" section to the right.

Finally, I've gone around and asked adoptees (and will in the future) to fill in a short survey so adopters can take the initiative and contact users they feel comfortable working with. We all know that most adoptees just place the adopt me template on their user page and leave it - so it's up to us to approach them and offer adoption. So, please take a look at the survey, adopt those that fit your interests, and maybe watchlist it so you can see the interests of adoptees and adopt one that fits your interests in the future.

Once again, thank you for participating in the adopt-a-user program! If you wish to respond to this post, please message me on my talk page.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Netalarm (talk) at 05:22, 11 October 2010 (UTC).

O_o Now, we'd have quite a hard time finding an adopter for you. =P Netalarm talk 05:36, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Hahaha. It's 12:45AM here and I can't find much non-brain-intensive work to do. Pretty sure I'll start making some weird edits if I tried to do intensive stuff... I'm sure if you visit Jimbo in real life and plead he would :p. Netalarm talk 05:44, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Umm... I reply here and you reply there? By the way, nice work with the article! I think I'm going to slowly head off to sleep now, before I pass out in front of my computer. Cya around! Netalarm talk 05:55, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

SPI
What about sleepers? ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 21:32, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Need your help translating
Could you take a look at the sources for the recent edit at Mummy. The editor, or someone, has added this before, and I'm not at all sure about it. Google's translation isn't that good but it did make me wonder if the sources are really about mummies. Thanks.Dougweller (talk) 18:20, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

About "New genera and species based on IUCN database"
OK, no problem. Do you have a source data or want to use the data from IUCN? I'm conversating with Kew Botanical Garden, if it is possible to export a raw data from the World Checklist of selected plant families in a format that would allow us to generate stubs (but this would allow also Wikispecies to have a comprehensive and up-to-date taxonomy). We shall see... Regards, Enzo^ (talk) 20:17, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Requests for comment/2010 ArbCom election voting procedure
You are invited to participate in the Requests for comment/2010 ArbCom election voting procedure which is expected to close in a little over a week. If you have received this message, it is because it appears that you participated in the 2009 AC RfC, and your contributions indicate that you are currently active on Wikipedia. Ncmvocalist (talk) 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Cheshire
Is that really necessary? There are several support comments and WP:CHES can hopefully deal with any issues that arise while Espresso Addict isn't around. Of all the reasons to close, this seems quite avoidable. Nev1 (talk) 11:47, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

"It was agreed by many parties that there is room for improvement." Really? I must say that I don't recognise that analysis of the discussion at all. Overall, plenty of support, no declared opposition and the only unresolved comments had a consensus against their necessity. Where are the "many parties" agreeing room for improvement, I ask? BencherliteTalk 00:49, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I supported, and reconfirmed my support during the discussion (see below).
 * The JPS supported.
 * Mhockey's comments were agreed by him to relate to project management than portal improvement; he/she did not express support for, or opposition to, promotion.
 * Fetchcomms made some comments (NB not stated as an "oppose"). Nev1 disagreed with Fetchcomms, as did I, but Fetchcomms never replied to our points.
 * Dincher supported after Fetchcomms' comments, and so must be taken not to have agreed with them.


 * OK, there must be some international variation in the meaning of the word "qualify" of which I was previously unaware. I was using "qualify" in the fourth sense given there ("to modify, limit, restrict or moderate something") i.e. "Overall, I think that the minor points raised by Fetchcomms aren't enough to make me qualify my support" = "Overall, I think that the minor points raised by Fetchcomms aren't enough to make me restrict or modify my support." Incidentally, if I had intended to remove my support, I would have struck through it (I've been reviewing at featured content discussions for long enough to know that), and, also, if you thought my position was ambiguous you could have asked – particularly because I also said "there's more than one way of getting a portal looking good and, even though I might not have done everything like this, I don't think the overall result is at all bad." I'm not sure how that phrase can be read as a removal of support, but anyway... If this unfortunate misunderstanding was the only reason for the portal's failure, then would you consider relisting and / or reclosing it? BencherliteTalk 16:40, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * As I didn't, and still don't, see how my additional comment was ambiguous unless there is another meaning of "qualify" in the version of English with which you are more familiar, then of course I'm not going to see that it could possibly be read as unambiguous. I don't think that I'm at fault for the communication problem here, as you put it. If, though, you tell me that "qualify" means something different for you, then I'll remember that for the future as a BRITENG variation to be avoided in discussions.


 * However, if you think that I am being inconsistent by supporting and then opposing in different parts of the conversation, then you of course can me ask for clarification before you close. As for timing of the closure, I didn't comment upon that because (clearly mistakenly) I thought that two or three people not agreeing with Fetchcomms's minor points would remove the need for EA to be around to make any changes to win Fetchcomms's approval.


 * As for EA being inactive and therefore possibly making the portal fail "well-maintained" in the future, that is a fair point; however, there is a WikiProject behind the portal, and I can also point you to many more portals where no changes have been made to the non-automatic or rotated content since promotion without any complaint or FPOR. In fact, if you're looking for FPo related work, there are some discussions at WP:FPOR to which you can contribute, and I have others lined up to nominate (rather than have too many under review at the same time).  Regards, BencherliteTalk 17:25, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

IP/Sockpuppet
In this edit summary, IP 69.196.154.204 admits to being User:Bytemeh (note they also removed the sockpuppet tags from User:Bytemeh's user page). Should the IP address be noted at Sockpuppet investigations/Misssinformative? --<b style="color:Navy;">Jezebel's</b> Ponyo <sup style="color:Navy;">bons mots 21:22, 9 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I just plugged the IP address in and made a note of it in the edit summary. Is that sufficient of should it be mentioned elsewhere in the SPI report? --<b style="color:Navy;">Jezebel's</b> Ponyo <sup style="color:Navy;">bons mots 21:34, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your help in relisting the SPI with the additional IP. Cheers, --<b style="color:Navy;">Jezebel's</b> Ponyo <sup style="color:Navy;">bons mots 13:54, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

SPI case was archived without comment on evidence
Please revert this edit, CU was declined, but it was left open for comment on behavioral.— <font color="Green">Dæ <font color="Blue">dαlus <font color="Green">Contribs 09:20, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

about cu
Check my comment here. Magotteers (talk) 07:07, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Jackiestud
I was obviously not specific enough. I was very clear to myself about Jackiestud not having edited those articles, my point, not made well, was that they both concentrated on articles to do with the subject of matriarchy and mother goddesses. I'd forgotten about SPI data being out of date, I should have raised this when I first had my suspicions, but I let AGF get in my way. I didn't realise that geolocation couldn't be used, as I thought that would clinch it. Dougweller (talk) 20:48, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * And the times of editing seem very similar. All this (including misuse of sources, some problems with English, could be coincidence of course, but I doubt it. Dougweller (talk) 06:47, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Revert at Hong Kong Airport
This doesn't look like vandalism to me; rather, it looks like he was removing outdated information (since 26 November is past). I'm also familiar with Snoozlepet as a constructive contributor to airport articles, and I wouldn't really think he'd be vandalizing articles. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 04:15, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * {including your reply for context} References shouldn't be removed, even though it's not in English. <b style="color:#0000FF;">OhanaUnited</b><b style="color:green;">Talk page</b> 04:17, 2 December 2010 (UTC) {endquote}
 * Did you read what I said? I said nothing about language; I said it's outdated. It says it starts on the 26th of November; that's past, so that doesn't belong on the page any longer. Even if it was a mistake to remove it, it's not vandalism unless there's a clear reason to believe it's not in good faith. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 04:22, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * If the flight is already in operation then the reference is no longer needed (eventhough if the language is not in English). The flight started November 26, 2010. Snoozlepet (talk) 04:24, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

user:JoKing
Hey OhanaUnited,

I am not sure how to go about doing this, but a checkuser report that I submitted that you took part in may have another addition. I found the user Rootsie contributions, an IP, another IP, Mercedes Cordoba which has a virtually identical history and editing style as the others involved in this case. Can I add that on, or should I start another report?

Thank you - Theornamentalist (talk) 19:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Done, thank you. - Theornamentalist (talk) 19:49, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Justin Bieber
Even the trial end, BLP violations are much more important. The page is semi-protected, and as you can see on its history it is not enough. Could you re-add it? <font color="#C40233">Tbh®tch Talk <font color="#007000">© <font face="Lucida Calligraphy">Happy Holidays 05:09, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for clarify it. <font color="#C40233">Tbh®tch Talk <font color="#007000">© <font face="Lucida Calligraphy">Happy Holidays 06:06, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Kbthompson
OK, this seems to be more complicated than I thought it was, so I've unblocked for now. I wasn't aware of the existence of that page, which isn't very surprising since it isn't linked to from anywhere, wasn't tagged as a guideline until yesterday and seems to be generally ignored. <b style="color:#FF0000;">Hut 8.5</b> 21:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigations/G.-M. Cupertino
I understand (sort of) why CU may be inappropriate, but why is the matter being closed altogether? Thanks for your attention - JohnInDC (talk) 20:34, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * (That is to say, I can see why a policy of not connecting named accounts to IPs makes sense; but that seems to be precisely what was done in prior cases involving this user and I'm not sure I understand the difference here.) JohnInDC (talk) 20:40, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your response. I haven't got any particular axe to grind here, so I can let it go; but I have to say I am a bit mystified by decision to decline.  It looks like a pretty common request, routinely granted in the past.  If in fact such requests are not proper, and if the absence of a confirmed CU ends the matter, how does one ever identify an IP user as a sock of a named (and banned) user?  JohnInDC (talk) 21:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I've blocked the IP on behavioural match, and because the IP matches networks with IPs that I have previously associated with G.-M. Cupertino. SPI is mainly about behaviour, and nothing about a decline from a checkuser prevents an admin from blocking.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:45, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

MediaWiki talk:Sitenotice
Hi. I left a response to your actions at MediaWiki talk:Sitenotice. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:48, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program
Hi! Thanks for signing the Online Ambassador interest list. We're gearing up for the next term right now, and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program will be supporting considerably more courses, with considerably more student activity... possibly upwards of 500 students who will need mentors.

If you're still interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 20:12, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Bot to delink images
You are invited to join the discussion at Category talk:Wikipedia files on Wikimedia Commons. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:55, 25 December 2010 (UTC) (Using )