User talk:OhioRuthie

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Family Court With Judge Penny has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblogcritics\.org\b (links: http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/11/28/123705.php). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblogcritics\.org\b (links: http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/11/28/123705.php)). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:06, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://www.myspace.com/familycourtwithjudgepenny).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Family Court With Judge Penny. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. EdBever (talk) 20:51, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Family Court With Judge Penny. EdBever (talk) 20:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Stop
Please stop placing your emailaddress on various pages. Please state your problem here or on my talkpage. EdBever (talk) 21:13, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

re: your message on my talk page re Family Court With Judge Penny
For the moment you are blocked from editing for breech of the guidelines editors are expected to follow. When the block expires, please feel free to discuss your concerns with me on my talk page (there is now a section User_Talk:Proofreader77)

(If the matter is urgent, you may use the email link in the left column on my talk page. Or use this shortcut Special:EmailUser/Proofreader77)

Please be assured that people who care about fairness of presentation of verifiable information will look closely at information added to the Family Court with Judge Penny article. --Proofreader77 (talk) 21:54, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

This is an important matter and I can't get this site to send me an email verification to email you. I've emailed the main non=profit organization but they won't get it til tomorrow. I've tried to post to the other moderators and they just deleted my request apparently and never contacted me. IF you are all really about fairness email me so we can discuss this matter. It's not what you think.OhioRuthie (talk) 22:20, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

I am unable to participate in the discussion about the protection of Family Court with Judge Penny page due to being blocked. I hope I will be given a way to discuss the matter before the page is unprotected. I've offered my email address and no one has contacted me. I'm unable to contact them because email verification isn't working for me. I keep hitting the request button but nothing comes to my inbox. So I need a moderator to email me or at least a guarantee that the page will remain protected until I am unblocked and can participate in the discussion.OhioRuthie (talk) 02:12, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, the page will be protected until after you (and the other editors) are unblocked. When the block ends, please go to the talkpage of the article to explain your objections to the material proposed.  While you are blocked, you might want to check out some of the relevant policies here, including verifiability;  neutral point of view; living people; and dispute resolution.--Slp1 (talk) 16:53, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

note: using "E-mail this user"
NOTE: I have sent you a message via the "Email this user" link (in the left column of this page). If you have your email address set up in your Wikipedia account, you should get the message. (If you receive it, use the "E-mail this user" link on my talk page to reply that you have received a message etc) Proofreader77 (talk) 01:02, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

FOLLOW-UP: I have responded to your email. Proofreader77 (talk) 02:49, 28 March 2009 (UTC)