User talk:Ohjeezewhy/sandbox

Article evaluation feedback
This is a very well-developed article to evaluate, and you've done a nice job with that here! Your evaluation is a good balance of strengths and observations of things that could potentially still be improved. Your discussion about the source quality is a particular strength of this evaluation, and I also appreciate how you're thinking about whether/where direct quotes are necessary or can be reasonably replaced by paraphrase instead. If you carry this level of exploration and critical thought into the articles you're considering improving, you'll be setting yourself up well for the final Wikipedia project. Nicoleccc (talk) 20:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Choose a topic feedback
Ava's Demon: A plot summary and major characters overview would be strong additions to this one! For a somewhat parallel example of a very well-developed article, you could take a look at the page for a comic like Saga (to get ideas for things to add). I don't see that it's typical for author/creator Twitter handles, Instagram pages, etc. to be added to Wikipedia articles...I have yet to see an instance of this that wasn't reverted, so if you choose this article I would recommend focusing on information about the existing work rather than the Twitter link.

Jasper in Dead Land: Creating a new article from scratch isn't quite how I've structured this assignment but can work if you can find enough sources to build an initial page for it. If this is the direction you'd like to go, let me know and I think I can link you to a template for creating a new Wikipedia page.

Alex Shook: This is a classic stub page, with lots of potential. What was his start in politics? What elections has he run in, what was his platform, what was voter reception/percent of vote in these? Has he had any notable successes or challenges in office? Has he been part of any controversy? The big question for this one is whether you will be able to find sources--I don't see where you've listed any results from an initial search, but as someone holding an elected office, it seems like it shouldn't be difficult to find some sources.

Ultimately, I think any of these can work fine for this project. The best way to narrow the three down to just the one you will work on is probably to see which has the best range of sources with the widest net of information. If you're still looking at more than one good option, which one would be most interesting to you to do that research on and learn more about for the next week or two? Nicoleccc (talk) 23:31, 14 July 2019 (UTC)