User talk:Ohmphotography

Welcome
Hello, Ohmphotography, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Banj e b oi   08:23, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Ohm Phanphiroj
Hello. How about adding links to evidence for the claims you make about Ohm Phanphiroj (whose domain name is perhaps not coincidentally "ohmphotography.com")? -- Hoary (talk) 11:44, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Ohm Phanhiroj
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Ohm Phanphiroj meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Ohm Phanphiroj. Don't forget to add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. CaveatLector Talk Contrib 19:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Ohm Phanphiroj
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Ohm Phanphiroj, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Ohm Phanphiroj appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ohm Phanphiroj has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ohm Phanphiroj and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Ohm Phanphiroj with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ohm Phanphiroj.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. -- Banj e b oi   00:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Banjeboy writes leave a note at Talk:Ohm Phanphiroj with a link to where we can find that note. Please don't, at least until an article exists. If you'd like to leave such a note, please post it here; Banjiboi is likely to see it (and I am too). Or of course follow the advice at the end: you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. -- Hoary (talk) 01:36, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:OhmPhanphiroj.jpg.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:OhmPhanphiroj.jpg.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.)  Beeblebrox (talk) 00:07, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Further, I've deleted the article (i.e. your user page) as it was copied from ohmphotography.com, which nowhere says that the material is either released under the GFDL or released into the public domain. If you are the subject/proprietor of ohmphotography.com -- which seems very likely, although we have to remember that anyone on Wikipedia can claim to be anyone -- then the easiest way to release the material for use on Wikipedia is to have either that website or the specific pages within it explicitly announce the release of the material, whether as GFDL or into the public domain. Then an article (and not a user page) can be created with its help. However, it cannot be regarded as a reliable source, and it's very likely that any article that made much use of it would either be rewritten beyond recognition by others or be deleted via "AfD".


 * Photographers and other creative people get articles on WP that are written by people other than themselves, and that derive from independent and disinterested sources. As examples, here's an article created almost exclusively by me and about a living photographer who doesn't even have a website, and here's one that I'm sporadically working on that's about another living photographer who does have a website, which goes largely ignored. I join Beeblebrox in urging you to read and digest this. -- Hoary (talk) 08:14, 3 May 2009 (UTC)