User talk:Ohnoitsjamie

Contacting me

 * You are allowed to use talk pages if you use them appropriately. If you post anything about Brighton/city status, you will be blocked immediately per WP:DROPTHESTICK. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

I prefer to communicate via talk pages. Please only email me if there is a good reason not to conduct a conversation on a talk page. I do not respond to emails regarding link deletions and other issues that should be discussed on your userpage or the article talk page.

Why did you remove my external links?
If you've come here because you want to know why I removed some external links you've added, please read Wikipedia's policies on spam, Wikipedia external link guidelines and conflict-of-interest first. Because of Wikipedia's popularity, it has become a target for folks looking to promote their sites, which is against Wikipedia policies. Wikipedia is not a free advertising platform.

Talk archives

 * 2005 archives
 * Jan 2006 - Mar 2006 archives
 * Apr 2006 - June 2006 archivesd
 * July 2006 - August 2006 archives
 * August 2006 - November 2006 archives
 * December 2006 - January 2007
 * February 2007 - March 2007
 * April 2007 - July 2007
 * August 2007 - October 2007
 * November 2007 - January 2008
 * February 2008 - April 2008
 * May 2008 - August 2008
 * September 2008 - October 2008
 * November 2008 - January 2009
 * February 2009 - April 2009
 * May 2009 - August 2009
 * September 2009 - October 2009
 * November 2009 - April 2010
 * May 2010 - July 2010
 * August 2010 - September 2010
 * September 2010 - January 2011
 * February 2011 - April 2011
 * April 2011 - May 2011
 * June 2011 - December 2011
 * Jan 2012 - May 2012
 * Jun 2012 - February 2013
 * Mar 2013 - July 2013
 * August 2013 - December 2013
 * January 2014 - July 2014
 * August 2014 - July 2015
 * August 2015 - December 2015
 * January 2016 - October 2016
 * October 2017 - March 2018
 * April 2018 - April 2019
 * May 2019 - July 2019
 * July 2019 - April 2020
 * May 2020 - October 2020
 * November 2020 - February 2021
 * March 2021 - October 2021
 * November 2021 - February 2022
 * March 2022 - October 2022
 * November 2022 - March 2023
 * April 2023 - February 2024

PLEASE LEAVE NEW COMMENTS AT THE *BOTTOM* OF THIS PAGE.

Notability references

 * Policy
 * Stand-alone_lists
 * Notability_(people) (which refers back to the above link)
 * Essay
 * Your alma mater is not your ticket to Wikipedia
 * Write_the_article_first
 * School administrators: WP:RFCSCHOOLADMIN

Potential repeated ban evasion
Hi Jamie, I was just looking into some strange IP activity and noticed you previously issued bans on the IPs in question, so I was hoping you might be able to help. Today a collection of IPs have attempted to resurrect a speculative draft Draft:GPT-5 by making a couple minor edits and submitting to AfC, despite previous consensus and clear notices indicating the article shouldn't be moved to mainspace until GPT-5 actually exists. The IPs in question are: Contributions/62.74.32.95, Contributions/62.74.58.35, Contributions/62.74.32.77, Contributions/62.74.56.192, and Contributions/62.74.58.183. This looks clearly to me like sock-puppeting or ban evasion. Could you please take a look? I was also wondering if there was a way to withdraw the AfC submission, since it plainly will fail, but I'm having trouble finding a way to do that, so if you know how I would appreciate a pointer. Cheers! StereoFolic (talk) 19:51, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Upgraded that partial block to a full block, quite possibly the same person. I reverted the AFC submission tags; I think that should be sufficient? OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:40, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you! StereoFolic (talk) 00:16, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Looks like they're at it again, this time with Special:Contributions/62.74.14.25. StereoFolic (talk) 15:28, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks; I dropped several more rangeblocks and sprinkled some salt. Let me know if you see any related disruption from Greek ranges. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:24, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Bleggen
I assume you are aware looks like a sock of. 2600:1700:1111:5940:FCA7:2D25:D4E5:C28F (talk) 19:12, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello, I am not but you are WP:griefing me now because I disagreed with an edit of yours. You also only did a few edits of which one is a summary starting with the words "We have been over this many time" in the edit summary of your first edit, implying that you are an alt. Please let's just avoid each other and not bicker with each other. ThanksBleggen (talk) 19:28, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You don't get to strike out other's comments on my talk page. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you, User:2600:1700:1111:5940:FCA7:2D25:D4E5:C28F, another sock back in the drawer. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I appreciate people who fight the good fight, like yourself. A frustrating and often thankless job, so Thank You! 2600:1700:1111:5940:FCA7:2D25:D4E5:C28F (talk) 01:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

A kitten for a admin :)
yolo i hope you are having a good day (hope this makes it better lol), btw so much messages!, anyway have a great day and enjoy a picture of this adorable kitten!

ModdiWX  (message me!)  14:39, 7 March 2024 (UTC) 
 * Thank you! OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:51, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

User 23.245.44.64
He has vandalized multiple articles including Mickey’s Mouse Trap (horror film), Kung Fu Panda, and more without citing a single source. He said March 22 for Mouse yet I searched everywhere and nothing. A couple of other users seemingly joined on this too. Can we ban him from editing? 98.144.64.54 (talk) 06:24, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Vyond
It seems again on Vyond-related videos regarding child discipline. Since I already reverted once, and appears to be understandably busy on other parts of Wikipedia, I wonder if you can review the second attempt and help me make it clear to the editor that such content is not notable? Sometimes I feel that the whole article may not be notable at all. Best, -- Minoa (talk) 12:23, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for the IP blocks on the Todd Helton page. Much appreciated! Regards, Bringingthewood (talk) 22:25, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

About block
Hello, what was the reasoning to block Special:Contributions/204.111.207.134 with 1 month instead of the more typical 31 hours/a week? —Matrix(!) (a good person!)&#91;Citation not needed at all; thank you very much&#93; 18:18, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * It's that IPs third block for vandalism; many admins such as myself will impose progressively longer blocks on IPs that disrupt frequently. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wikipedia study
Hello, I have been contacting editors with experience in specific areas of editing to participate in a survey study. In order to limit access without forcing editors to disclose their identity in the survey form itself, I have been contacting them via email, which you have disabled for your account. If you would like to participate, please send me an email through Wikipedia and I will follow up with additional details and a link to the survey. Jonathan Engel (researcher) (talk) 13:08, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Australian childish vandal
Per Special:Contributions/Lets play a gsle today, I think this is another LTA that's worth adding (with said regex) to one of your private misc LTA filters. Habits are on this page on Meta. Codename Noreste 🤔  talk  05:12, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I've begun to experiment with some filters; no hits yet. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 13:15, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Reversion of French bulldog edits
A remark that you made in the reversion of my capitalization edits in titles is incorrect. I recommend you read the Wikipeda Manual of Style section on it.

There you will find that citations should, in fact not follow capitalization that would be incorrect in Wikepedia articles. And that Wikipedia citations are under no obligation what-so-ever to match the capitalization in the cited original. To the contrary: Capitalization in all Wikipedia (English language) article citations should be "corrected" to follow Wikipedia standards, despite not being identical to the capitalization in the cited source. A classic example of this is excess capitalization in titles of journal, magazine, and newspaper articles. Only the title of the journal itself, or the newspaper, or magazine, or conference proceedings, is allowed to have full capitalization.

You might find it a helpful clue, that the full-capital titles are usually the fields that are automatically italicized by the Wikipedia "cite" template.

However, there are some cases for foreign language title capitalization that I'm uncertain of: For example all German language sentences have all nouns (whether personal or general) capitalized; it's just a language standard (e.g. "a man from Munich" is ein Mensch von Munchen, not ein mensch von Munchen) so I presume that the normal sentence capitalization is carried over into cited titles (but not into their translation, of course). But to the contrary, I notice that a lot of citations for French and Italian language book titles (neither of which I have any language training in) seem to only start with upper case, and then go lower case for the rest of the title. I'm not sure how to proceed; in edits I've made so far, I've just retained the lower-case in a book title, and applied capitalization only to the translated title. However I might be being deceived by some style used by the citing editor that isn't standard for French or Italian the language, or which might not be standard for the Wikipedia for those languages.

But other than that, I really would suggest that you read up in the W:MOS. After that, you might want to revert your reversion, unless you find other intolerable errors. 107.122.85.58 (talk) 21:12, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You may find it helpful provide links to the MOS policies you allude to. Where in MOS:TITLECAPS, MOS:ALLCAPS, or WP:CITESTYLE does it say that we should "correct" article titles to follow "Wikipedia standards"? The only prescription I see is that we should convert all caps to title case (quoting from MOS:ALLCAPS: Avoid writing with all caps (all capital letters), including small caps (all caps at a reduced size), when they have only a stylistic function. Reduce them to title case, sentence case, or normal case, as appropriate.) Furthermore, please note the discussion at Talk:French_Bulldog regarding capitalization.  While the MLA does support the notion that "french bulldog" should not be capitalized, there does seem to be an existing convention in Wikipedia to capitalize dog breed names (e.g., Labrador Retriever; to systematically change all of those titles would require a policy or a consensus, neither of which I'm aware of. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 21:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Dholuo language guide
HI Jamie, I had made the original Dholuo language guide J"https://www.freewebs.com/themulders/luoguide.htm" back in 2006 or so. This was on the wikipedia Dholuo site for ages (I didn't put it there, someone else must have seen it was very long/comprehensive and added it). I just noted that the freewebs is defunct and so I updated the link to a duplicate site that I had created years ago as a back-up - http://dholuo.weebly.com/ - but you removed this. I'm not sure why. I don't think there is a better more comprehensive language source out there. I have no interest in the website itself; you are welcome to copy the content and make your own. I just think that the information is helpful to have for the world so please consider re-adding that link in the wikipedia references for this. Helperlady2 (talk) 23:17, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Weebly sites are not appropriate per WP:EL. Please do not add it again. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:18, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

ok I won't - I have never edited any wiki page ever before and this was my first try to try to help; sorry i didn't know that rule. but if you care about people having access to this dholuo source please consider copying the content from that site and making a new site and adding that new link.
 * I would think that anyone who knows how to use Wikipedia also knows how to use Google to find more info on Dholuo. Wikipedia is not a guide. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:26, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Sorry
Hello its me Joey. I think we got off on the wrong foot. Firstly Im sorry for not listening to your warning originally from August. After your warning I stopped working on the Wikipedia page, but resumed in February and im sorry, I understand that the salted article rule is in place to prevent an article that has been previously deleted several times for not meeting notability to not be recreated. I should have listened to you.

Also sorry for the mess in the deletion discussion. I just was new at it and I kinda seemed a bit new to it, also you were right about the sources. I couldn't find many on him, their were only 2 kinds of sources, 1: Controversy about Jeffy which the Sun reported on and Good Morning America, but it is rather criticising the show rather than giving an indepth source and infromation and 2: The Tom Brady auction, well good sources on Logan that mention him, they only cover the winning really and not his channel career, just because Logan won an auction doesnt equal Wikipedia notability, I understand that indepth sources from third parties are what equals notability because first party sources could be biased in favor of that person. I understand that my arguements werent good arguments in favor of keeping said article.

I promise to listen to administrators warnings and only create articles using reliable third party sources.

PS: I like the serious business user box thing on your user page with that picture of Gary Busey, he is a good actor. Anyway OhnoitsJamie, I promise I wont recreate that page again, and I promise I will follow all adminstrator rules and take ever warning very seriously. Joey (talk) 01:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Everyone makes mistakes, and I'm happy to hear that you've learned from yours and are ready to move on. Feel free to ask me questions if anything comes up that you're not sure about. Additionally, the Village pump has links to a number of great resources including the WP:TEAHOUSE, and WP:RSP is a great place to check to see if a source meets our reliable sources criteria. Cheers, OhNo itsJamie Talk 11:42, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you Joey (talk) 17:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

LTA active on another IP after your block
Take a look at their edits. Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs - WP:BIO concerns, adding unsourced ages of living people to articles, persistent disruptive editing/vandalism focussed on Joseph Yablonski, Longtail Aviation Flight 5504, Ronald Ryan, MK Airlines Flight 1602, etc. Shearonink (talk) 14:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello it's me again...I don't know what this disruptive editor's issue is and I don't care but please can something be done? This drip-drip-drip of persistent vandalism raids on articles is annoying & wearing & takes other editors away from actually creating & editing around here. Either a range-block for this IP or protect/semi-protect all their usual targets - Joseph Yablonski, Henry Lee Lucas, W.A. Boyle, various spree/serial killers, various violent events, etc., a range-block to include IP ranges around 197.157.3--(with Vodafone Egypt). In my opinion these IPs are the blocked editor/LTA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Psydodo, otherwise known as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Asura_Indra/Archive. Shearonink (talk) 13:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I've blocked another proxy range, but when persistent LTAs are employing proxies, there's no simple all-encompassing solution other than to block IPs/ranges as they crop up. OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:59, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Wilson Medical Center
Last month you gave a user a final warning "Third block for WP:SYNTH". Sadly, right after the one-month block ended he edited Wilson Medical Center (North Carolina). The citation he provided does not support the statement added, once again engaging in WP:SYNTH.

"Wilson Medical Center is owned by Apollo Global Managemen

2a02:c7c::/32's block at AN
Hi, I found 2a02:c7c::/32's block settings interesting enough to start a discussion about it; it's at and your input would be welcome. I'm notifying everyone whose name appears in the block log as this is practically a review of a series of admin actions yours was a part of. I hope that, due to the amount of administrators who built the block to the current state, discussing this in a central location directly rather than asking everyone for input on their own talk page is okay. And perhaps there was a past discussion and this is completely unnecessary silliness of me; I apologize in advance if that's the case. Best regards, &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 00:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Massage in so-called "Turkish baths" and in the Hammam
While I'm not prepared to go to the stake over your revert, I am interested to know your thinking. There is increasing unhappiness in the Islamic world about the use of the phrase "Turkish baths" as it implies that this originated in Turkey whereas it is an intrinsic part of Islamic culture worldwide, including Turkey, of course. Furthermore, today's use of "Turkish baths" in The West can include anything from Russian steam baths to gay saunas and day spas. This is one of the reasons why a couple of years ago it was decided to split the article on Turkish baths into two: 1. "Hammam" (about which this part of the massage article is certainly true); and 2. "Victorian Turkish baths", the hot dry air bath (about which the description in this paragraph was only true in a very few establishments, for a very short time, and is certainly not true today). I was merely bringing a specific phrase into synchronisation with current wiki practice. If you've searched wiki recently for "Turkish baths" you will probablyhave found a redirect to "Hammam". However, perhaps I should have taken even this small change to a talk page first. I did not do so since similar changes, with updating the wikilinks accordingly, has raised few objections in other articles. Best wishes, Ishpoloni (talk) 16:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * It was a mistake and I reverted myself immediately. I'm not sure what else you want me to say. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Nothing! I was actually apologising to you! Best wishes Ishpoloni (talk) 18:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Conflict-of-interest/Refspam
Hello. In February 2021 you warned an editor twice (1, 2) about COI/Refspam. In the second warning you called it the "last warning". It seems they haven't stopped, as they have continued adding their refspam. Would you be able to take a look at this? Kimen8 (talk) 14:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

CaseOh
Hello! I noticed you added protection to this article awhile back. FYI, this just happened, I asked oversight to take a look. @Stwalkerster, @Liz, FYI-ping to you too. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi
Can you provide real sources please Emirati08 (talk) 18:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * You are very close to being blocked indefinitely. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

ACWA Power links
Hello dear Jamie, I worked with a freelancer to help to publish our VC&MD and CEO pages on wikipedia, and for some reason they were deleted, can you please help in fixing the issue and having the pages back? Or do I need to hire another free lancer to publish new pages?

Marco Arcelli - Wikipedia Raad Al-Saady - Wikipedia

Thank you for your support, Yahya Yahya.Hamidaddin (talk) 08:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Please take the time to read the warnings on your talk page regarding promotional edits, copyright violations and undeclared conflict-of-interest. OhNo itsJamie Talk 12:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Meless13
Based on CU data, appears to be operating from a different location than the LTA. I base this on the assumption that and  are examples of that LTA, both of which geolocate to warm areas of the U.S. I'm not permitted to say much about Meless13 but can say they are not on the same continent and aren't using a proxy (based on spur.us and on my own port scan). --Yamla (talk) 17:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I will unblock. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks! --Yamla (talk) 11:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Filter 1094
Hi Jamie, while reading this I came across this filter hit and while the edit is unconstructive, I don't think it's the filters target. Thoughts? Nobody ( talk ) 12:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, that is a false positive; let me see if I can tune it a bit. There have been so many WP:SPA accounts disrupting that article (some of them likely socks that the filter targets), probably should just semi or EC protect that page for a long time. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Vandalism
Hi! Is it possible you could have a look at the recent vandalism to Josh Aloiai? Doctorhawkes (talk) 10:59, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I made some adjustments to a few IP range mitigations. OhNo itsJamie Talk 12:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Changing links on BBC Radio articles
Hi, do you think 109.157.219.87 is the same person as some a few of the IP addresses you've blocked earlier on this year? Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 21:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Regarding article 'Delhi University Students Union', redaction and page protection.
Jamie

This is in regard to the article Delhi University Students Union. On [| April 18] I made a request for page protection, the action taken on that was the blocking of the User by You. Thanks for that. Further, I made certain changes to the article on April 19, that changes were redacted by you. The imitation of same on my [| talk page] has been replied to you, action awaited from your behalf. Pl guide me thru further course of action for both, undoing the redaction(s) and, page protection as the vandalism of the same content is still on.

Thank You. iAshwinDeshmukh Deshmukh.3851 talk 09:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Hi Jamie, Recently you blocked this account [] for sock-puppetry; could you compare the IP address of that account to the IP user commenting in []. I'm finding what's on going on a bit weird and out-of-place. CeltBrowne (talk) 23:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * They both geolocate to the same area, but that's about all that can be discerned from those IPs. I don't have WP:CHECKUSER so I'm not privy to additional anon editing details. OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Editor you've dealt with before now leaving nonsensical edit summaries
Back in October 2021, you stepped into a situation where User:Lynchenberg was, at first, making unfounded allegations against the band Mr. Bungle and Mike Patton within their articles, and ultimately making aspersions against me for not allowing their attacks against either. Soon after, Lynchenberg stepped away from editing for the most part. When they returned in December 2023, they making minor disruptive edits to articles that they obviously saw I was active in. When warned, their response was to request I delete my account. In the meantime, and ever since, they've decided to leave nonsensical edit summaries to most articles that they edit. Another editor requested an explanation for the most recent edit summary and their response was more of the same nonsense. At this point, it really seems obvious that Lynchenberg is WP:NOTHERE. Would you mind looking into this? NJZombie (talk) 03:04, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

EFFPR
Hi Jamie, as you may know, there's an Indian IP that keeps making reports without triggering any filters. Just in the last weeks there were at least four (IP 1, IP 2, IP 3, IP 4). I'm wondering if theres a better way to deal with this than just revert and ignore. Nobody ( talk ) 06:46, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Maybe they should add it to 1161 or 1242? Codename Noreste  🤔  La Suma  07:01, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I was thinking a range p-block might work, but not sure if theres a good range for that. Nobody  ( talk ) 07:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I've partially blocked 2409:4043:4C00:0:0:0:0:0/40 from EFFP for a month. It's likely an LTA handled by 1242 whom I've thwarted from disrupting articles about political leaders. OhNo itsJamie Talk 11:29, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks Jamie. BTW, do you think it would be possible to revive Filter 707 to stop edits like this? It's happened a few times and usually isn't picked up by 1151. (Feel free to Mail if there's some private specific concern.) Nobody  ( talk ) 06:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

About your block of JulbuEv
Quack, quack.  –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Cliff Cash protection
Hi, would you mind extending the move-protection alongside the edit-protection? There have been several messes made with pagemoves by this user and I don't see the page needing to go anywhere anyways. Thanks! Tollens (talk) 08:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅ OhNo itsJamie Talk 11:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Old Collegians Rugby Club
Why did you revert all my changes to this article? You removed the cn template from the mostly unsourced history section and restored the controversy section with many unsourced statements and an unencyclopedic tone that I had spent time remedying using the one reliable source that had been present there that actually mentioned the article subject. The citations that I removed were only tangentially related and didn't mention the article subject by name at all. If you are reverting per WP:QUO, that's fine, but should probably indicate as such in your edit summary and should probably contribute to the discussion that I started on the article talk page.

The problem with this article is the various sock/meat puppets that have been trying to remove the controversy section entirely. Uhai (talk) 12:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The material I removed restored was sourced to this Guardian article. You are free to restore the cn template and adjust wording if you feel that it's unencyclopedic. OhNo itsJamie Talk 12:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You didn't remove this material, you added it back, and some of it is not adequately supported by said source and lacks sufficient inline citations. There's also concerns regarding relevance and WP:UNDUE (e.g. the whole thing about climbing the rafters and assessment scores). This is exactly why I started the talk page discussion: to discuss these things and modify the section as necessary. It honestly is WP:TNT material. Uhai (talk) 13:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Meant to say "restored." OhNo itsJamie  Talk 13:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

reliable site
Is an obituary a reliable website? Gymrat16 (talk) 02:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * See WP:OBITUARIES NJZombie (talk) 03:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Syntax error
Hello OhnoitsJamie, I've been cleaning up Wikitable syntax errors for the last few months, and have gotten it down to the last one hundred and some pages. Ran across your User:Ohnoitsjamie/Box page today, which has some missing table closing tags and a few other WP:LINT errors.

As the page is Full protected and I have Extended Confirmed access, would you be willing to update the page to this? Just copy and replace the full page, it will add the missing table closing tags, and update the obsolete font and center tags to HTML5 compliant equivalents.

Thanks! Zinnober9 (talk) 15:07, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

About your block of Grymbler
Hello @Ohnoitsjamie,

I'm a user from Germany who mainly edits in the German Wikipedia. I am writing to you because there is a user that you have indefinitely blocked and who asked for help in the German Wikipedia (link). After the discussion was archived, he asked me for help again on my private discussion page. Of course, none of us can help him, since we don't know the case (and most of us aren't otherwise involved in English Wikipedia). But the way he asked us for help (instead of making an attempt with a new account) didn't give the impression that this was a case of block evasion. He seems a bit desperate and has no idea whose sock puppet he is supposed to be. The fact that he was a bit rude to you and used very undiplomatic language probably didn't make it any better.

Can you perhaps explain whose sock puppet he is supposed to be, where the suspicion comes from and whether it might be possible to unblock him? I'm only asking on his behalf because he asked for help. I have no idea if he's just taking advantage of my good faith. Bildungskind (talk) 16:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 * That user was engaging in WP:DUCK block evasion of an LTA that primarily edits from a number of IP ranges; they made nearly identical edits that a user from one of those known ranges had recently attempted to make. That's all I can tell you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh, I didn't know about the IP range. In the German Wikipedia it is allowed to say which accounts are linked as long as you don't mention the exact IP range. But I don't know if the policies are different here. Anyway, thank you for your answer and have a nice day. --Bildungskind (talk) 16:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Question about 2409:40d0::/35 p-block
Hi OhnoitsJamie. I've noticed in the past few days there's been a bit of deletion related activity which seems to be from a range you've p-blocked. I'm not to familiar with sock stuff unfortunately, but I was wondering it that range was known to be something specific and if there's anything else we'd be able to do (it doesn't seem like there's enough to get anywhere at SPI? But again, I'm not really familiar). Alpha3031 (t • c) 05:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * That's a huge dynamic range in India that is likely to cover a wide mix of anon editors. The partial block was to minimize disruption to an article from a small group of socks.  I try to avoid fully blocking large ranges, but IMO if 75% or more of the edits are non-constructive it's worth considering a full block.  (For precedent, we routinely block large mobile ranges in the US). OhNo itsJamie  Talk 11:43, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Editor with civility issue
Would you mind looking into some of the edit summaries of User:GalaxyFighter55? They just left an uncivil comment toward me in response to an edit I made. This led me to see that they seem to have been leaving similar uncivil edit summaries in their recent history.. Some of their talk page messages to users are also a bit much. User:Centcom08 brought their edit summary behavior up to them back in January, but it seems to continue to some degree. NJZombie (talk) 02:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You can, but it's not necessary to snoop around as I’ve believed I have conducted myself properly since then. If you take offense to the comment even though I myself didn’t think it was much of a violation of NPA until you've taken note of it here, then sorry. Name calling was not my intention towards you. And FYI most of the links you’ve brought up since then are not really violations of uncivilly, but I will admit when I deserve to be called out for NPA.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 03:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I disagree, and that's why I've pointed those links out. NJZombie (talk) 04:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Agree to disagree. Most are your perceptions of uncivil claims here are weak at best and are presented without much context behind them beyond what you linked at face value. It doesn’t matter anyways since I’ve already received an NPA warning from this user, so let's move on.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 04:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

TPA may need to be revoked
See Special:Diff/1223573078 - it seems they didn't want to peddle their keto elsewhere and decided their talk page 7 months after a block was the right place to do it. Figured I'd let you know if you found it appropriate to remove TPA. Thanks! jellyfish &#9993; 01:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

May you unsalt BiglyBT?
We seem to have a rough consensus at Talk:Vuze to include a section containing BiglyBT now, so a redirect created on BiglyBT would be helpful.

I may have started Articles for creation/Redirects before realizing I could just contact an administrator... Thanks in advance! Aaron Liu (talk) 20:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't see a solid consensus there. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

45.88.200.238
This IP is editing disruptively again after your previous block. Not sure who they are block evading as, but you may want to look at/revert their edits again. Thanks. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 17:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you, blocked again! OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Springfield, Ohio
You PC protected this article 11 years ago over an edit war that appears to have been long over. Do you think the protection is still necessary? Lynch44 (talk) 01:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * These days I rarely protect anything for a time period of indefinite, and that certainly seems unnecessary for this particular article. Unprotected, thanks for catching that. OhNo itsJamie Talk 11:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Regarding the user you warned
Hi. Just letting you know that I have reported the user you warned, to the Commons admins for repeated copyright violations. TornadoLGS (talk) 17:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * They may have finally gotten the hint, but any further copyvios will result in a block here. Thanks! OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * ...or not. Blocked indefinitely. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 11:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

About my article deletion
Please tell me why set my work for soeedy deletion? When it had all citations and references from a reliable source. Just send me a copy of my work please, that work was not saved. Miss Rosewood (talk) 16:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:BIO and WP:RS. The references you added clearly do not meet reliable sources criteria. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:58, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Animal Shelter
Hello OhNoitsJamie. I am a patrollers in the german wikipedia: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Davidgf86

You deleted my edit of the statics animal shelters of england. This is my second time, where i edit in the englisch wiki. Why you delete my edits? And why spam on animal shelter?

Davidgf86 (talk) 23:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * For the reason I already put on your talk page. Your edits here (and on de Wiki) suggest a pattern of spamming links, which we don't permit here. If you continue to spam links here, you will be blocked from editing. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:18, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Source Assessment Page for Chandler
Given the recent discussions on the 2024 Libertarian National Convention talk page, I'm wondering if it might be worth creating and whitelisting a Source Assessment page for Chandler. It would be something that could be easily referenced in the future to show why Chandler isn't considered notable. I'm not gonna create one until I run it by you since I don't want to trip the filter and I don't want to create said page if it goes against policy, but it seems to be exactly what Source Assessment pages are meant for.

Also, I want to apologize if I took over the discussion on that talk page, and if I took time away from your day by doing so. I understand that you get a lot of bad faith contributors wanting to reference Chandler on various pages, and I understand that it's probably just frustrating at this point. I'm sorry if I came off as one of those people, because I really try not to be. Thanks for your patience. Cerrathegreat (talk) 11:07, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Per this, there are many better ways that you could be spending your time in Wikipedia. Focusing on Chandler will probably not end well. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Biographical information of Rauf Mohammed
Hi OhNoitsJamie,

I recently undid your reversion of an edit on Rahaf Mohammed and you re-reverted it. While the English language coverage is limited, it got considerable coverage in the Arabic language, and I listed five additional sources on the Talk page and tagged you there also.

I noticed that one of the sources was RT, so I'm not sure if there might be some political slant to this. However, all of the articles mention verifiable public statements made on social media by both the subject and her husband, and apparently the Canadian police were also involved in the dispute. Chagropango (talk) 18:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You'll find RT listed here; that is most definitely not a reliable source for WP:BLP. The others are also questionable; for WP:BLP, we always err on the side of caution. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Citation bot triggering your misc LTA filter
See Citation bot's filter log, where it triggered your misc LTA filter several times on Political impact of Taylor Swift. Is there any way to fix this or to possibly exclude bots? Codename Noreste 🤔  La Suma  00:24, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Strange, that filter should exclude bots. I haven't been able to figure it out yet. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 01:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * This hit and this one too. It's not happening that often, but since it can affect even sysops it's not good. Nobody  ( talk ) 09:36, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * That's a different one, and I'm not concerned about that. We don't need to have that individual's name in Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 11:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I agree with that. But I wonder if the reason it got hit is the same problem. Nobody  ( talk ) 11:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Right now I'm trying to determine if I have some of the parens nesting wrong. OhNo itsJamie Talk 11:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I tried debugging it earlier with adding/removing parentheses but I always ended with same result, so I tried changing the !contains_any but I haven't finished that attempt yet. Nobody  ( talk ) 11:56, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I think I figured it out and fixed it; I think it had something to do with how irlike was normalizing IP addresses, or it could've been nesting, but the "test against past hits" looks good now. (The Kiwi Farms trigger was removed from this filter because it's covered by other filters). OhNo itsJamie Talk 11:58, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Hmm removing the IPs, but leaving the irlike doesn't work so I think nesting was the issue. Nobody  ( talk ) 12:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

"Not done"
Hey there, I noticed at Edit filter/False positives/Reports that you are typing " " while replying to reports. Do you mean " "? It's because these comments appear empty. ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 16:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I fixed 'em. Nobody  ( talk ) 17:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I guess I was a bit too worried that I'd violate WP:TPO if I did it. Just wanted to make sure. ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 17:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for fixing those; I must've been thinking of the "not done" template we use in the spam blacklist page. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

John Singer Sargent
In "It was based on the Sargent and fashion exhibits at those two museums in 2023 and 2024, linked to below in "External links" , you deleted the crossed-out phrase as "unnecessary." Perhaps it is not strictly necessary (what is?), but it is certainly helpful to readers. That is because the article on Sargent has no section on exhibits, so a reader who wants information on the two exhibits would find them only in "External links" but would not necessarily think to look for them under "External links." Actually, I can see a reason to delete the crossed-out phrase, which is that, if someone edited "External links" to delete the two exhibits, then the crossed-out phrase would also have to be deleted but might not be noticed by the editor. But it seems highly unlikely that any editor would delete the two exhibits from "External links," and I think that the helpfulness of the crossed-out phrase easily outweighs the likelihood of that occurrence. I will not revert your reversion, but I'd appreciate it if you would, or at least elaborate, in light of what I've just written, on why you still think the crossed-out phrase is unnecessary. My philosophy is that too much information is better than too little, unless, of course, the information is irrelevant or unnecessarily lengthy. Maurice Magnus (talk) 22:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * We don't annotate/comment on navigation in a Wikipedia article beyond standardized conventions. As you've already noted, making those sorts of comments in an article becomes especially problematic if the reference subject is modified or deleted. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

OhNo itsJamie Talk (I pasted the foregoing because I was not permitted to click "Reply" to your comment.) I'm glad that I was able to provide you with a better reason for your edit than the one you offered ("unnecessary") :-) Maurice Magnus (talk) 22:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Yeah, glad that worked out. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Block evasion by 95.147.145.134
I noticed that the reason given for 95.147.145.134's block was "block evasion". I cannot find the name of the sock master from the IP's talk page or logs, but just a heads up, the long-dormant account Dqwyy made an edit to one of the articles the IP was blocked for shortly after the start of the 3-month block on the IP, and Dqwyy has the same set of very specific topic areas (e.g. Asian pornography) and only makes mobile web edits. Seems like a duck to me. Yue 🌙 20:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I blocked that IP for making similar edits to an LTA that I've seen use a variety of IP addresses; I'm not aware of a master account, though perhaps someone else is. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:17, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Bubblemario is back
I have a strong feeling that 91.75.6.80 is bubblemario based on his edits, and seeing his history of editing certain legal pages in the UAE. Please look into if he's another sock169.255.56.205 (talk) 07:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Liliana UwU  (talk / contributions) 07:58, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I have a strong feeling that two IPs are blocked and an article is protected for awhile. OhNo itsJamie Talk 10:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

46.184.90.237 and 2409:4088:818A:8E0F:4B16:EA41:91A9:55B
Hi, I was just looking into some strange IPs activity on List_of_2_Days_%26_1_Night_episodes page and noticed you previously issued a ban on the IPs in question, so I was hoping you might be able to help. Today IPs try making a couple of minor edits. They wanted to change the official rating from 6.1% to 9.2%. They want to add the wrong information. The IPs in question are: 46.184.90.237, 2409:4088:818A:8E0F:4B16:EA41:91A9:55B. Offical rating agency page - https://www.nielsenkorea.co.kr/tv_terrestrial_day.asp?menu=Tit_1&sub_menu=1_1&area=00 Raynen (talk) 04:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I partially blocked a large IP range for spamming lawyer sites; I'm sure this is unrelated. For situations with editors making unsourced changes, please give them "unsourced edit" warnings (e.g.  , etc) and report to WP:AIV if they keep it up. I've given the IPs an initial warning. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 11:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Another TVFT range?
Possibly the case list needs expansion.41.62.55.98 (talk) 11:52, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅, thanks. OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:22, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I attempted to revert their edits but were disallowed. Please do something.102.159.199.12 (talk) 21:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 * You'll need to be more specific about which edits you are talking about. OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:58, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
 * They are disallowed by an WP:EDITFILTER, both the above IP address and this address I am currently on.102.158.132.236 (talk) 08:23, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

They now seem to be editing on a wider range (i.e. /16), mainly targeting the page free TV (MENA). Please keep track on their contributions.197.26.147.50 (talk) 13:21, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * TV-related edits are going to be filtered on those ranges because of the LTA. Constructive users on those Tunisian ranges who wish to edit TV-related articles can create an account. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 12:54, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dinner Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Reverting Edits
Hi I have noticed you reverted a few edits, such as removing WP projects at Talk:Karni Sena or Talk:Pravin Togadia. I have added related WP projects to these articles. WP Discrmination and WP Crime Projects are added because in the main article, the organisation or an individual entity is involved in such heinous activity and it is properly described in the main body of the article page, moreover they're properly sourced. You can read the article properly before reverting my edits. For example you removed WP projects from Talk:Sudarshan News. Please read the main body of the article its clearly mentioned the news channel is involved anti-Islamic or discriminatory rhetoric. That's why I added. Thanks 2409:40E0:54:2813:A013:8080:43F2:1B54 (talk) 05:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 * We don't add categories like "discrimination" based on single/minor incidents. Please stop trying to canvas categories like that. OhNo itsJamie Talk 11:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi OhNoitsJamie - I actually reinstated the IP's edit at Talk:Karni Sena - the version you reverted back to had a completely messed up template on top, and (more concerningly) it had what appeared to be a real name and a phone number on one of the more recent comments. The problematic revisions have been suppressed now - would you mind reviewing and removing any wikiproject stuff that you don't think is appropriate? Cheers Girth Summit  (blether)  14:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 * OK, understood, I was wondering about the suppressed edits. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

"New Changes" from North Macedonia
(So far)

An anonymous user who leaves the said edit summary while commiting edits on software- and company-related articles. Albeit narrower ranges are currently blocked, they seem to be editing at a wider range. most recent activity.102.158.130.25 (talk) 17:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * This doesn't look familiar, you're going to have to give me some more context as to why you're reporting this directly to me instead of WP:AIV or WP:ANI. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:43, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Suggestion to change the messages used on your private filters and some other suggestions
On, , , and , they all use the standard disallow message, which can be bitey or discouraging to new users and/or non-vandal targets; I would suggest changing to MediaWiki:Abusefilter-disallowed-LTA since the latter message is less bitey.

Also, on 1164 and 1242, the tag is not required since the edits are going to be prevented anyway. Just the disallow action (and nothing else) works fine. Codename Noreste 🤔  Talk  17:35, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks, those are good suggestions and I've implmemented those changes. (I think I'd initially misunderstood the purpose of "tag" and thought it had to do with User:DatBot reporting). Cheers, OhNo itsJamie  Talk 18:36, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Possible block evasion
Hi OhNoitsJamie. Could you please take a look at the recent activity here for possible action and a tweak? I think it may be this editor. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:48, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Unrelated to that, doesn't seem to work well with the new dark mode. Much of the page isn't readable in dark mode. You might consider using the new background color variables instead of hard-coding specific colors. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:51, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi Daniel; I agree with you, but I got some pushback from here, so I'm just letting the edit filters do their work for now. Personally I found all of their RFPP change requests to be mostly pointless and disruptive. Thanks for the note about my talk template; I'll look into that. OhNo itsJamie Talk 03:41, 21 July 2024 (UTC)