User talk:Ohnoitsjamie/archive43

Sock user adding unsourced info
Back in February IP user 139.182.208.223 received a two month block for continuously adding unsourced info to Carlos Correa. Not only was it unsourced, but they kept adding it directly before an existing citation that did not support the statement. Now, just over two months later, new user User:MinnesotaMethods has begun making the exact same change. After two warnings, another new account, User: KyleCrick, created just minutes ago, is attempting to back up the change. Seems like a WP:DUCK to me. Could you take a look when you get a moment? Thanks! NJZombie (talk) 18:11, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Could be WP:MEAT; I don't have checkuser, so I can't say for sure without filing an WP:SPI. In any case, all of the accounts have been given final warnings. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:22, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I noticed this after reviewing the history at Carlos Correa following my question to a new user. For some background, see Talk:Shannon Sharpe. I see that Gigablick was indeffed—if I had noticed that earlier I would have indeffed my user rather than leave them a question. I will indef them in 24 hours or so but I thought I would post here to let you and know that there are a couple of hoaxes being promoted. Johnuniq (talk) 07:50, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Looking at the Carlos Correa edits, it seems possible that it’s the same user. To be fair, the issue was never that the original editor was claiming that Correa resided in Minnesota. It was the fact that they kept adding information about it directly in front of a source that didn’t support it and wouldn’t take the time to learn how to do otherwise. Doing a quick Google search now shows that Correa has, in fact, made a recent home purchase in Minnesota since it looks like he is staying with the Twins. So I don’t look at those edits about him being from Minnesota as a “hoax” necessarily. However, if it is a sock user, that needs to be addressed of course. NJZombie (talk) 10:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * That being said, they're now using User:Wallace Mountain and User:Swatt Sonar, in addition to User:Quanto Quick to make the same edits. Obvious sock activity. NJZombie (talk) 01:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I indeffed the three ducks (Swatt Sonar + Wallace Mountain + Quanto Quick) and semi-protected Carlos Correa for a month. Johnuniq (talk) 02:22, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Fake image of kudmi topic
You provide fake image of kudmi community. Why you did it? 2409:40E1:100B:6A34:85FF:2BCB:BEF7:A6FA (talk) 17:34, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I restored a valid image. I don't understand why you think that it's "fake." OhNo itsJamie  Talk 18:32, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Why did u revert my edit
Hi Jamie, why did U revert my edit on Cyberpunk 2077? I have several pieces of evidence stating why u shouldn't have reverted by edit.

1) The subtitles of the game clearly state the characters by their first names NOT their last names

2) in the accompanying article for Cyberpunk Edgerunners, most of the characters are referred to by their first name, not their last.

3) The game is clearly based off of fictional events, and no real people are involved in the game.

4) The surname is standard rule is completely bananas. Many wikipedia articles about video games clearly refer to the characters by their first name, like the ones for GTA V. HiGuys69420 (talk) 23:35, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * WP:MOS conventions are not dictated by game subtitles. You're welcome to take it to Talk:Cyberpunk 2077 and see if there is a consensus to use a different convention, but in the absence of that we default to standard conventions. OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:01, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

2023 Israeli judicial reform
Hi Jamie, thanks for reverting the IP editor's additions to 2023 Israeli judicial reform. I think that you also accidentally reverted a cleanup of sources by @CastJared. Misha Wolf (talk) 00:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

reverts on list of fw aquarium fish
you reverted an edit by @Alex Colt47 and apon further search you have reverted other of his seemingly normal/ sourced edits, what is up with that? The edits seem good, have a source and arent conteraversial, is there something im missing? Realfakebezalbob (talk) 19:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 * That account was indef blocked as a spam-only account. "fishyfishpet.com" does not remotely meet WP:RS guidelines. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Question
Hi, Onij, can you tell whether the latest account, who's also fond of promotional editing, is the same as the account you blocked in February ? Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:21, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't have WP:CHECKUSER access, so an WP:SPI would have to be filed unless it's a very obvious sock, which doesn't seem to be the case here. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:33, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Vans
Hi, you blocked an IP range from editing Van a little while ago (likely a Zerolandteam385 sockpuppet, not certain). They have moved on to add the same type of content to List of vans instead, while they are waiting for the other block to expire. Should I file a report somewhere or will notifying you suffice? Thanks,  Mr.choppers &#124;   ✎  19:40, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Added to block; we have 10 slots for partial blocks, so there are three remaining before I'd have to resort to a full block. Thanks! OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:32, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm sure they'll fill them all soon... Thanks.  Mr.choppers &#124;   ✎  14:39, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, this editor is now targeting Hino 600 with the usual MO of adding long lists of WP:OR competitors, uncited and so on. Grateful for your attention.  Mr.choppers &#124;   ✎  17:53, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Added some more pblock targets and added a full block to a 64 range (the IP is dynamic across the /41 range, but at least for the last week has been within a smaller 64 range). OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:01, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Appreciated, thank you.  Mr.choppers &#124;   ✎  18:59, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Here's another one: . Thank you.  Mr.choppers &#124;   ✎  12:28, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Spellchecking
Hi, i have noticed naming of some articles are not correct, for example: Colonel Amirouche, his real name is Amirouche Aït Hamouda, Check Mokrani, Sheikh Amokrane, Boulifa, Si Amar U Saïd Boulifa, indeed correction is minor but relevant, nice to meet you. Masaialva (talk) 21:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Names from other languages/cultures frequently have multiple acceptable variants/spellings in English. It's disruptive for editors quibble over the spelling variant.  If a variant is patently incorrect and you have reliable sources to support that, it should be brought up on that article's talk page. Piping the name to an alternate spelling on other articles is not appropriate in most cases. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 22:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm agree with you, it's going to be very long, do we use berber latin alphabet for? In the other case, it's better to keep some alternative names which are appropriate. Masaialva (talk) 22:14, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Whatever language is primarily associated with the subject, that script/language can be used for showing their name in other languages; in some cases, more than one may be used. Regardless, it's not helpful to quibble over English transliterations. From Manual_of_Style: Spell a name consistently in the title and the text of an article. (Relevant policy: Wikipedia:Article titles; see also Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English).) For a foreign name, phrase, or word, adopt the spelling most commonly used in English-language reliable sources, including but not limited to those already cited in the article. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Space Mountain
Hi Onij, perhaps renewed page protection. And is the IP range responsible too vast to be blocked? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Blocked two ranges from New Jersey for 3 months; maybe that will do that trick? OhNo itsJamie Talk 03:11, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Whac-a-Mole. Thanks and cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:24, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Dheeraj Sharma (professor)
Some of the matters that you have added to the site are subjudice. I see that you have protected the page and added what you think is right. It is against law in India to aid and abet media trials. The material should be deleted. 117.236.106.195 (talk) 06:53, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * There are multiple sources that easily meet WP:RS that support that material. OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

The Great Gama
Hello there this article The Great Gama was protected by you some time ago due to disruptive edits on the mans nationality it seems some editors may start engaging in this point of view pushing again  this user made a very strange edit I tried to restore back to the long standing original just wanted to know if you think it needs to be protected again thanks in advance. 2A02:C7C:6782:7A00:F11A:E166:5465:8297 (talk) 11:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Grigori Grabovoi
Re your comment here - blocks don't seem to be making a dent at Talk:Grigori Grabovoi, They're still at it. MrOllie (talk) 19:11, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Talk page protection
Would you be able to place temporary protection on my talk page? There's a user that's been IP hopping in order to add unsourced box office analysis to the Clerks III article for the last day or so now. Myself and two other editors have indicated that it's an incorrect addition. After several false vandalism accusations made against me, user resorted to posting their arguments and accusations on my talk page today. After, refuting them and stating that I wasn't interested in having this discussion on my talk page anymore, the editor, using yet another IP address, reverted my deletion. Once that was deleted, they added even more. So now it's just harassment. Thanks for any assistance you can provide. NJZombie (talk) 19:49, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I’m not affiliated with the other apparently banned user he keeps WP:HOUNDING. Either he’s confused or trying to stir the pot with his row against me. Blaming us for his feud with him is not his right.


 * For the record, I’m an employee of the Lyric theater in Colorado and some members of our cinema-lovers club do occasional editing from our public computers. I’m sure there is the occasional troll from here given these are public computers. However this zealous user taunted me into coming to his profile page to debate them only for him to change his mind without warning and revert my counter-argument out of spite. That’s his right. Then the other aforementioned allegedly-banned user that he was also taunting jumped in to apparently fan the flames.


 * I have no desire to debate this editor anymore on his profile page, nor become entangled in his drama. I told him to resume his debate with me on the article’s forum page if he must.


 * tl;dr version— I’m only responding because of his false accusations of vandalism and sockpupperty. Told him to file an SPI rather than drag his drama to all these other places. 2601:282:8100:32A0:95E1:D373:5241:8C19 (talk) 20:20, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yet you AND that unaffiliated IP editor are both blocked from editing Talk:2000 Mules. Heh... what a small world. SPI filed. Thanks! NJZombie (talk) 20:29, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Nationality dispute Gama
Dear it seems like editors who want to claim Great Gama as a Indian are back the neutral and stable version has been removed and they keep adding "Indian" wrestler when the consensus for over a year has been to use neutral terms since he took up Pakistani residence after 1947. Is there anyway of protecting the article? MahisoeoEk (talk) 07:43, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Sources which do not back Indian nationality claims
This source also states British India and later Pakistani as nationality Another source which states "Indian and then Pakistani after partition" So sources are disputing this argument he was just a Indian wrestler most define him as a wrestler during the British Raj era which seems neutral I am not sure why Indian editors seem to insist he was always Indian. MahisoeoEk (talk) 08:18, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Discuss on the article's talk page, not here please. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:51, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Explaining my edits
Hi sorry to pester you again it seems my edit summary's may not have been as clear every edit I made here ,,, and here  along with the others I may have missed is in response to a sock  (this account edits kashmir based articles and culture) and  (this sock edits all the massacre pages) they are both accounts of the banned same user hence I was attempting to restore the original neutral versions based on Ban revert policy plus the edits are so clearly biased I am surprised nobody has reversed them yet. I sometimes missed adding that to the edit summary which seems to be causing the confusion as other edits where I mentioned it were not removed. However please note this edit has restored some seriously pov material referring it to as "occupied" is not a neutral term. I understand admins are busy and do not have the time to deal with every troll or sock on Wikipedia. Please let me know you have acknowledged this and sorry for the confusion. MahisoeoEk (talk) 16:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia doesn't need editors who are only here to argue about disputed territories and historic ethnic labels. I understand that some of your edits were reverting block sockpuppets; that's fine, but I'd suggest that you find another purpose here beyond the aforementioned quibbling. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:52, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I actually have edited other topics but by the nature of the topics I have an interest in i.e food culture I tend to see these types of editors and come across their edits so I feel compelled to restore and remove the vandalism South Asian topics unfortunately are highly toxic and I try to remain neutral but it can be tough. Thanks for responding. MahisoeoEk (talk) 17:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * This edit may be food-related but it's still (1) unsourced and (2) pointless. If you continue to make such edits I will be compelled to block you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It seems like you did not pay attention again Jamie I did source it to the Punjab origin. The term South Asia encompasses the entire Punjab reason so South Asia or Indian subcontinent rather than a specific country is more than reasonable. Please look a bit more carefully before jumping to conclusions. MahisoeoEk (talk) 17:32, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * This is the one the Punjab region is split in both states hence the South Asian label. MahisoeoEk (talk) 17:34, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Brighton
can I just ask why you’ve banned me and also why your so against the official naming of Brighton and Hove. 78.86.32.99 (talk) 13:51, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I've already told you. You're edit-warring from sock multiple IPs against consensus. I suggest you move on. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:37, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Disruptive IP ranges
Could this range be fully blocked rather than the current partial block on articles? This range (and others that are clearly related) have been disruptive on a number of articles, including SpongeBob SquarePants related articles, such as SpongeBob SquarePants (season 13). On that article, there has already been:


 * 2600:1005:B000:0:0:0:0:0/38
 * 2600:1005:B080:0:0:0:0:0/44
 * 2600:1005:B000:0:0:0:0:0/41

Thanks to them, that specific article has been protected until (at least) October, but now they are doing disruptive edits on the talk page. Also worth noting that of the 3 ranges listed above, the /44 range is currently fully blocked for 6 months, while the /38 and /41 ranges are both only partially blocked. They are continuing their disruptive edits/vandalism across many other articles, including disruptive edit summaries such as this. At this point, it seems like a full block for those two ranges (as well as any future ones) would be most beneficial. I hope you can help- thanks in advance.

P.S. I am requesting this to you, as I had previously submitted a report regarding this issue at WP:AIV, but it was rejected. Magitroopa (talk) 21:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I've expanded the blocks for now though I shortened the duration of the 38 range as it had some (a minority) of reasonable edits. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:07, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

editing info on Huey Dunbar page
Hi, The edit you initiated removed accurate information. Why did you initiate editing the info, so that I understand your intent. Thanks! Huey Dunbar Hueydunbar 20:41, 3 May 2023 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dualstress (talk • contribs)
 * Please carefully read the warnings left on your talk page. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Sock
This account (Robepang) is most likely a sockpuppet of this account (Poberang). Similar usernames, userpage, scope of articles, and behavior, not to mention periodically reemerging from "hibernation" after other accounts were blocked. It wasn't long ago when you blocked the latter for disruptive editing and sockpuppetry. 211.38.75.238 (talk) 07:53, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Killing of Jordan Neely Edit
Hi the source you used as an example doesn't mention the person who lead to Jordan Neely's death as a Marine? Presumably it was retracted.

Could you provide another source. I just don't know if it's appropriate to include in the lead till the identity is confirmed. LoomCreek (talk) 17:14, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Please take the discussion to the article's talk page. I did not add the identify of the Marine. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:15, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Killing of Jordan Neely
Wanted to get your opinion. Does this need to go to an RFC? I'm not sure waiting around a few days is going to attract a lot more support one way or the other. What do you think? Cheers! Magnolia677 (talk) 14:11, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I see User:WWGB removed the disputed content from the article. Not sure there was a consensus, but we'll see if it's reverted. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:16, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Page removed
Why did you remove the page. we did not add any music there. Lalsingh (talk) 16:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

It has a link to an educational institute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lalsingh (talk • contribs) 16:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The person you created an article about does not meet WP:BIO or WP:NACADEMIC notability criteria. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:59, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

The criteria mention The person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area.

The person is guest associate editor in following journal Guest Associate Editor for Stem Cell Research Frontiers in Genetics

Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/132398/overview

The person is editor in chief in following journal linke given below https://www.malayabiosciences.com/index.php/mjb/about/editorialTeam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lalsingh (talk • contribs) 17:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * That's great. The COI warning still stands. Wikipedia is not a promtoional platform. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi there there is no COI. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lalsingh (talk • contribs) 18:55, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't believe you. I'm not discussing this further. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:01, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Sam Holmes PROD
Hey @Ohnoitsjamie, I went out and found some in depth Norwegian sources and added a little to the article. Newspapers.com isn't working right now but I'll be sure to check and try to find some better English sources to add. I've removed the PROD tag and just wanted to let you know slash keep you in the loop.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 06:21, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Spam blacklist
You have been mentioned at MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist. TrangaBellam (talk) 12:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Pages with unreliable sources need to moved to draft space
Can you take a look at these pages? Battle of Bannu, Battle of Akora Khattak and Battle of Kandahar (1834). These all have sources that fail verification and have unreliable sources. 2601:547:B03:55CD:79E3:CAAB:BDBD:BE83 (talk) 23:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * We don't draftify every article with source issues, but we can draftiy new articles with source issues. OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * yes all these three articles are new with source issues. Please take a look. 2601:547:B03:982:4FC:1015:10A2:58F1 (talk) 02:18, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm tired of looking at these articles to be frank. OhNo itsJamie Talk 02:19, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I understand but some action is needed as the creator of these pages uses random sources to falsely support his article. And he keeps removing tags without resolving them. He even did the same on the article you just moved back into draft space by undoing your revision and removing tags, and . If you have the ability to, can you also check for sockpupptery between users Kamal Afghan01 and Yousufzai033 and IP 39.40.68.238. There changes overlap as well as the reverts,  and  and 2601:547:B03:4098:9C47:2BF6:3929:738A (talk) 13:29, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't have WP:CHECKUSER. You're free to file a WP:SPI report. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:17, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Ohnoitsjamie, fyi the 2601 IP is a block-evading sock of HaughtonBrit. Abecedare (talk) 14:23, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I can't make heads or tails of that report; IP, please stop posting here. I'm not interested in getting involved further with this. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:40, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

just fyi
I don't disagree with your removal of the quotebox from The Mooknayak - I had added it because I was trying to get into a flow of developing the article while the request for page protection is pending, and had started by adding the quote with the hope that it might help tamp down some of the disruption that has been happening. But it did not seem to help, and disruption has also continued on The Mooknayak founder Meena Kotwal's article in the meantime, so I'm glad you are also working on the article, and I figure I will get back to the article at another time. Cheers, Beccaynr (talk) 02:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry, didn't mean to step on your toes while you were working on the article, but there does seem to be a consensus (perhaps undocumented?) that box quotes should be used very sparingly in Wikipedia. I protected Kotwal's article and will keep an eye on the other.OhNo itsJamie Talk 04:31, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm more than happy to work with you on the article - after the disruptive editing settles down, then working on the article will be much easier. And thank you for protecting Kotwal's article. I also totally agree about box quotes - I had been trying to extend maximum good faith to the editors who kept trying to change the article so it was about Mooknayak, so I was thinking the box quote could help clearly explain what the article was about while I tried to expand the article. After you (correctly) removed the box quote, I figured I would let you know about what led to the unusual addition. Cheers, Beccaynr (talk) 05:38, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Brian O'Conner (Paul Walker) in Fast X
Should we added Brian O'Conner's flashback appearance on Paul Walker's main page? He did 'sort of' appears in Fast X opening, mainly flashbacks from Fast X. 2A02:C7C:5ADE:9E00:FCF4:CB44:B50A:BE01 (talk) 20:23, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Unless you can find a reliable source crediting him as cast member of that film, no. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Request for protection
Have replied back with the reasoning. Please kindly help as this has happened over a long period of time and appears to be malicious-intended slandering and a clear violation of BLP guidelines. Wikicheck007 (talk) 00:49, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The discussion belongs on the article's talk page, not here. In any case, I've blocked all of the throwaway WP:SOCK accounts and agree with you that the material doesn't belong on that page. OhNo itsJamie Talk 04:04, 21 May 2023 (UTC) OhNo itsJamie  Talk 04:04, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Why no fandom links
On the backrooms page why cant it be there it is an essential part of the wider lore why cant there be an external link to it or is it that Wikipedians tend to be allergic to any other wikis online AvailableViking (talk) 00:05, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:ELNO, especially items #11 and #12. OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:26, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

I need your help
Have been trying all my best to write up a letter to YBNL and am trying to use the reference deck to drop my comments but it's hard pls help me out P.bhoiomooba (talk) 22:22, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a forum or public relations interface. If you continue to misuse Wikipedia for this you will lose your ability to edit. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:57, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

iO Tillet Wright
Why did you block me considering my eddit of the page of iO Tillet Wright. He/she is more/most famous now for being Amber Heards friend and testifying on the Depp-Heard trial. @Ohnoitsjamie 213.114.194.206 (talk) 13:49, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Your opinion does not constitute a reliable source. Further disruption will result in an expansion of that block. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:45, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

You can just expire those. It's Skiyomi faking IP addresses and attention seeking. So we ban the IP and she taunts me on my user talk. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Got it, thanks! I wasn't sure if there was a way for the tool admin to see the underlying IP. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:27, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

do not block my edits
you are repeatedly breaking Wikipedia policy on WP:SMEAR chud, you need to stop this (on Umskiptar page) You have some kind of bias against the author (Varg Vikernes) as does the (((""reviewer"")) you keep adding to the page. A needless negative review from a nothing failure of a person (music critic.) i literally cannot imagine a greater tragedy to the divinity placed by the GODS into mankind than using that divine spark of life to post album reviews for some company. maybe its even worse to do that and intentionally write smear articles against musicians you don't like and worst of all 3, to continuously add it to Wikipedia in breach of the anti-bias rules I would reccommend moving this up to some higher power of wikipedia editor circles, as its very clear to anyone that the reviewer has a personal grudge/vendetta/bias AGAINST the person, and not the music, and therefore has written negative reviews about his music repeatedly (commenting negatively on the artists non-musical character in the articles) which tells me he just doesnt like Varg Vikernes. thx ;-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.100.233.220 (talk) 08:46, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
 * It's a review from a legit and notable music site; as I've noted before, the reviewer has previously left more charitable reviews of other albums from the artist. This isn't the first album in history to receive a poor review. If you remove it again, you will be blocked from editing. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:21, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Primary Sources Tag
Hi. On the Barton Paul Levenson page it is tagged with excessive use of primary sources. Do you mean the citations based on the published interviews with the author? If so, how would you recommend that the page be remediated? Botendaddy 17:29, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
 * For most biographical information and especially for establishing notability, we require third-party reliable sources, especially for establishing notability of a subject; that is, newspaper, magazine, or journal articles written about the subject or the subject's work. Articles written by the subject or catalog links to the subject's work are primary links; the article has very few of the former and lots of the latter. The "Style" section in particular is problematic; most of the links are "cited herein" (presumably primary links to the actual work?) and links to a blog, which  does not constitute a reliable source.OhNo itsJamie  Talk 17:34, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Range block to include User:109.104.153.86
Hi there, I noticed that you blocked the IP range User:109.104.153.64/28. There is another one around that range that should be included but I don't know how to change a rangeblock: User:109.104.153.86. I blocked it individually but it would probably make sense to extend the rangeblock. Thanks! ... disco spinster   talk  15:47, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I've extended it to 109.104.153.0/24. Thanks! OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:55, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

I have proof of that is what you want here is my IMDB page https://m.imdb.com/name/nm0498503/37 years working in hollywood! What else would you like? To make me notable?
I have proof of that is what you want here is my IMDB page https://m.imdb.com/name/nm0498503/37 years working in hollywood! What else would you like? To make me notable? Bleej9115 (talk) 22:48, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Per WP:IMDB, IMDB is not considered to be a reliable source for establishing notability. Please read WP:BIO. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

What is a reliable source my contracts with studios, my film footage seriously… google me? Bleej9115 (talk) 00:24, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

What do you consider proof of notable existence? Pictures? Contracts? Videos? I can get all of the above?
Who are you and who decides what and how to make someone notable? Bleej9115 (talk) 00:26, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I already posted a link to WP:BIO. That is the policy that determines notability. OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:35, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * It's also posted on their talkpage, together with WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:44, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Xurome


Hello, Ohnoitsjamie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Xurome".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:55, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Gary Maas protection
Thanks for weighing in on the protection requested for this article. The phrase and citation for the intent to relocate was added on suggestion of another editor (admin?) to resolve the dispute. The original text was simply "Maas currently resides in St Kilda, roughly 40km from his electorate." which is highly relevant to a political figure and I believe should be re-added to the article. What evidence/citation would Wikipedia accept for a location of residence that balances the need for accuracy with the need to protect someone's privacy? 121.200.6.242 (talk) 23:21, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
 * You're not going to add that, per WP:SYNTH. The source you described said nothing about Maas's current residence, only a statement he made years ago. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:25, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

That is not what I said. Please re-read; I am asking what evidence would be acceptable to reinstate the location information without the reference to the intent to relocate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.200.6.242 (talk) 11:27, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
 * You'd need to find a recent third-party WP:RS that says Maas was criticized for living 40 km from his constituency. A "people search" or government records website is not a third-party reliable source. Further WP:SYNTH violations or attempts to disrupt that article will result in an expansion of the blocks. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:36, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

TV SERIES
Can you please explain why it is not useful, as you reverted my edit?

Many of the links redirect here, So definition should/must be explained there, So I added. M.parvage (talk) 17:51, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
 * The material you added was redundant and unnecessary. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:53, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Ues I know that not useful and unnecessary are the same. I am looking for an answer to why it is unnecessary. While TV Series is redirected from many sites. and the lede needs a summary and explanation of the TV series. This is what I add, isn't it? M.parvage (talk) 03:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * The material you are adding is not supported by the source you cited, which makes it original research. OhNo itsJamie Talk 04:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Web Series
How does the source 1 present "web series" is frequently used to refer to streaming television series.

As you reverted my edit

M.parvage (talk) 08:18, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I already explained why I reverted your edit. Please stop posting here if you're not going to read the policy links I've posted. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Someone left you a note
In case you didn't pick it up in your watchlist, someone (possibly a child) has made a vague threat against you. User talk:Colton2022 Largoplazo (talk) 20:03, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Pretty exciting stuff. They won't be leaving any more notes. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:15, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Good grief. And he wasn't blocked indefinitely? 47.227.95.73 (talk) 16:21, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Football LTA
I saw you blocked an IP the other day for LTA concerning football articles and so wanted to draw your attention to User:2804:1884:3C:8A67:7C1A:15AA:BBD5:A97B - I think this may be another. Patient Zerotalk 00:17, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Wait a minute, I'm looking more closely at those edits; what exactly is the disruption, and who is the LTA you think it might be? I intially misread this diff as adding a bunch of nonsense characters, but now see those are table codes. It's not clear to me what the disruption is, other than maybe WP:CRYSTAL? OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:25, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Ahh, thank you for pointing that out. I thought it was nonsense characters, too. I'll self revert. Patient Zerotalk 00:51, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Waning Healthline discussion at RSN
This discussion seems to have run its course, with new comments by Colin more WP:NOTFORUM than about whether to blacklist/deprecate or keep. It is my first lead on a RSN discussion, so I am not sure how it ends, and have assumed that you or another admin would conclude it if there was consensus, as you stated.

I believe the tally is: keep (1, Colin); deprecate (2, Rhododendrites, Shibbolethink); blacklist (11-13, Zefr, NW1223, JoelleJay, Psychologist Guy, SandyGeorgia, buidhe, bloodofox, ScienceFlyer, OhNoitsJamie (conditionally if there is consensus: "the existing 500+ links are cleaned up prior to blacklisting"), Hipal, MrOllie, also MrOllie, AndyTheGrump, Alexbrn, now called Bon Courage); unclear (1, Whatamidoing).

Users Hipal, MrOllie, AndyTheGrump, and Bon Courage have not participated in this RSN discussion, but are regulars on the board. Would it be appropriate for you to invite them for confirmation?

Regarding your comment about the 500 or so entries where Healthline already is used, I assumed a bot would tag and/or remove those. Comments, please? Zefr (talk) 03:46, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I am not aware of a bot that can cleanly excise links (especially if they are refs), but maybe such a thing exists? In most cases, those have to be manually removed, and if they were the only reference supporting a sentence, need to be replaced with a "cite needed" tag. It ends up being a lot of work. I definitely support deprecating the link (e.g., making a notation on WP:RSP), but if add the link to the blacklist right now, suddenly 500+ articles can't be edited until that link is removed. I personally don't believe in adding a site to the blacklist and then leaving it to others to do the cleanup work. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 04:50, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * If a bot doesn't exist for such a function, one should be written for the admin toolkit. I assumed an admin could request a bot from tech to replace Healthline refs with [cn]. I don't write bots, but that seems a straightforward solution. Village pump? Zefr (talk)
 * Anyone could request a bot, not just an admin. Good luck; I don't think writing such a bot is as easy as you may think, but I'd be happy to be proved wrong. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:11, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Partial block
You may want to consider a permanent block. Seasider53 (talk) 17:43, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

is lurching inexorably toward a WP:CIR block -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:35, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Within millimeters of the event horizon. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:36, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
 * To jump to another metaphor, looks like they've found themselves a good shovel. OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * It's the curse of the DFO UTRS unblock.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:08, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Reblocks are easy enough. That one flamed out pretty quickly without wasting too much time! OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:30, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * 😀-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:47, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

10 partial block targets reached :)
Hi, the following block is both about to expire and now filled with entries:

I guess increasing its duration would be reasonable, and perhaps creating sub-blocks on smaller ranges. Or an edit filter. Yeah, probably an edit filter. Hm hm. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:11, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅; see (ignore the hits through Feb; that was from an earlier discarded prototype for a different filter).  OhNo itsJamie  Talk 23:08, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Emoji_u1f603.svg That's cool, thank you very much! Sorry for the late reply, hadn't watchlisted the page here. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:26, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Ilkay Gundogan page
he is transferring to FC Barcelona. So do not change it to Manchester City as his current team. DuckyPro289 (talk) 21:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:SPORTSTRANS OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Not sure what to do here
Special:Contributions/2A02:C7E:27C9:5B00:650F:E856:3F61:976E needs a block but that would mess up your partial block. Is there an easy way to handle this? Thanks. Doug Weller talk 18:02, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Blocking the entire /30 range? If you just need to block 2A02:C7E:27C9:5B00:650F:E856:3F61:976E/64, that won't mess up my partial block. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:04, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see there's quite a lot of recent disruption from 36 (or a possibly larger range). Feel free to full block the whole range; I have an edit filter for selectively targeting large ranges that I can use on a longer-term basis. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:07, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I thought it might. Doug Weller  talk 18:10, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Concerns about AngelicDevil29's edits
Hi @Ohnoitsjamie! Can you please take a look on the AngelicDevil29's unsourced additions on a large no. of articles, a behaviour which they have continued on inspite of being warned at least five times, including your message on their talk page, this month alone. The user has recently also breached the 3R rule on Langah (clan) by again adding unsourced claims, inspite of being requested to do so. Sutyarashi (talk) 16:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Yeezard's edit
Could you check over edits? I am messaging you since I saw you've commented on their talk. Could you look through some of their edits? I noticed they made an edit that was clearly factually incorrect and paired it with source that didn't check out at all. I checked another one of their edit and the cited source was invalid. I see some of their other edits remain and I feel uncertain about the accuracy of the information. 20:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't have much time for Wikipedia today; it would help if you had a diff in mind. I'm not going to review all of their edits. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Special:Diff/1144035734 for example. I tried to check the sources and I was unable to verify.
 * Special:Diff/1144034119. They changed say it's owned by Cargill, which is untrue. I checked the source they added and turns out artco.com has nothing to do with the company. I checked archived version too. I'm beginning to suspect it's vandalism only account. Graywalls (talk) 20:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * So far, none of the references I've looked at check out. Will block. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Web series
Please post your views here. Kailash29792 (talk)  05:36, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Page restoration
Hi, Ohno. I am puzzled by your action at Draft:Ritika Verma. Unless I have misunderstood something, you have done a cut and paste move rather than restoring the deleted page and moving it. Is that right? If so, why? JBW (talk) 21:12, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I originally just deleted it (after I warned the user to stop creating A7 articles), but then saw that it'd been moved from draft, so recreated the last draft, which probably wasn't necessary. I'm fine if the draft is deleted; sending any of those through AFC is a waste of time anyway. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:25, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * It probably won't make a lot of difference whether the draft is kept or not, as it isn't likely to become an article anyway. However, as long as is kept, the editing history needs to be kept too, so I have restored it and history merged it. JBW (talk) 11:31, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for cleaning that up! OhNo itsJamie Talk 12:55, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Nimona Movie Edit
Hi, I'm confused. You deleted the summary of Nimona, citing that it was unsourced. But after checking 20 other movies, including Shrek, The Iron Giant and The Departed, movie summaries don't typically have sources. They have references to subjects shown in the movie, but I'm unsure what would qualify as a source for a summary. Apologies if I mistype anything or am horribly getting the rules wrong, this is my first time editing or writing in one of these. CormacMind (talk) 11:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I've restored it per WP:FILMPLOT; the current version seems to satisfy that. OhNo itsJamie Talk 04:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you! CormacMind (talk) 4:14, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Heads up
looks like a sock of to me. Bringing it to your notice because the username of the former and your block of the latter suggests that you likely know more of the background than I. Abecedare (talk) 22:19, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Interesting strategy there. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:46, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Re.:Scam
Is it possible to have a list of scams on this article. Reason I'm asking is that there is some new and novel scams going on, like the one that some Spam will cause you to lose everything in your bank accounts IF you click on a link that said "You WON $100,000,000!", one that claimed your kid is in jail, you lost all of your property in some kind of mortgage scam, you clicked on some Spam and you ended up with kiddie porn via some kind Trojan Horse bug. I've seen these on the news and some computer ads, in my newspaper in which my AG/DA has warned people of a new scam. Can a list of these be added to the Scam article? 216.247.72.142 (talk) 05:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * No; Wikipedia is not a consumer protection directory. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

about hawpa
May you kindly remove your proposal that the wikipedia of hawpa be removed? I added "serhatnews" and "democrathaber" as sources to their connection to "kurden nasyonalist" i think 2 medium sized independent turkish news stations reporting about them is enough to comply with GNG. Thanks

-the 3 writers of hawpa's page Perz00 (talk) 12:58, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Those aren't very strong sources. For one, the section on "Hawpa" is identical in both pieces, suggesting that one copied the other. Secondly, per Reliable_sources, the author of the pieces isn't identified, making it difficult to ascertain if these are articles written by the staff of the papers or whether they are editorials or an article submitted externally, neither of which would pass WP:RS.  Per WP:PROD, you may dispute the tag yourself, but then I'll send it to WP:AFD unless you can come up with stronger sourcing. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 14:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Regarding Ritika Verma page
Dear Wikipedia Editor, I request you to please restore this page to main space as the person is notable as she was awarded one of the prestigious award presented by the Indian Government and honorable President of India i.e. National Service Scheme award (NSS award). I have created this page on March 2022, I agree with your edits which you made to the draft now, the page is now crisp and clear. Thank you very much and regards, Gargkk (talk) 15:07, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Winning a social work award does not automatically confer notability. I suggest taking the article through the WP:AFC process, though you'll probably be wasting your time as it's unlikely you'll find sufficient depth of coverage from reliable sources. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Smash Mouth in Kim Possible.
How is it unscoured, it is not. Smash Mouth really did guest-started as themselves in the Kim Possible episode Queen Bebe with the song "Come On, Come On" and was even included on the shows soundtrack 2601:196:4A01:D770:B630:D239:EF6A:E453 (talk) 17:06, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * You've been blocked for this before. During this month-long block, please take the time to read WP:CITE. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:11, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Harvard Extension School lock
Hi you locked the wrong version..a vandle came in and said "open enrollment programs" this is not true.. 2607:FB91:161D:23D8:D888:186D:36C1:9F0D (talk) 04:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * As has already been suggested to you, please discuss changes to the article on the talk page instead of edit warring. I don't see the issue with "open enrollment" being in the lede, as the organization is pretty clear about it. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 04:25, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Dare I link The Wrong Version?  Liliana UwU  (talk / contributions) 04:27, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

The lead already says this and i wrote it..HES offers over 900 courses spanning various liberal arts and professional disciplines, offered in on-campus, online, and hybrid formats. These courses are generally available to both its matriculated students and to the general public.

No one is hiding anything!

Also respectfully,

I DIDNT start an edit war, I collaborate with people -- even you if you recall. the lede was fine. People had different edits but it was fine. You made some I made some others made some..everyone is happy. Lyonsden1995 is a troll. This guy who has a hard on for Extension..goes through all the alumni pages at Havard Extension and scrubs their university affiliation. This guy is a troll. Look at his edits!

So please revert it back to before he edited it..also what he said isn't even true. Extension is Harvard University's part-time, ***open-enrollment program***, offering undergraduate ALB and graduate ALM degrees primarily for nontraditional students. Academic certificates and a post-baccalaureate pre-medical certificate are also offered.

They don't offer any open enrollment degree programs. So please just revise his edit. There's a section of the leade that I mentioned above and it mentions the mission to punooc and open enrollment but the section for degrees is not it because it confuses people ..you need to be matriculated to get a degree and that is not open enrollment.

If you have any further questions please talk with me but please don't be your usual fiesty self my anxiety isn't handling this tn.
 * The discussion belongs on the article's talk page; I'm not discussing it further here. Feel free to make an edit request there. OhNo itsJamie Talk 04:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Page review
Good day @Ohnoitsjamie i would like to seek your assistance on the review and approval of Qing Madi page. Thank You.

Tobiladun (talk) 12:25, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Your partial block of 2a02:c7c::/30
You should block them from editing Shailesh Jogia as well. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 13:54, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks; added that to the partial, plus a full block for that /64. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:04, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Now they're disrupting Henry Cort.  –Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Very unlikely to be the same user; /30 is a *huge* range, which is why there's only a partial block on it. The Henry Cort edits appear to be good faith, albiet mildly disruptive; let's see if they respond to your feedback. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 15:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
 * They responded by moving the goalposts.  –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:52, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Re.:Momo....
Thanks for the help.😘🥰 216.247.72.142 (talk) 14:17, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Re:Talk Pages
Appreciate your reminder on this matter. I'm new here. I've been trying to get some help with source placement, etc.😭 Can you help with this? 🥰 216.247.72.142 (talk) 03:59, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Pointless block
Hi, your two-year article specific range block on my current ip address is a bit pointless. Customers of the provider are regularly reassigned to massively different ranges and can’t, so far as I know, select a range. Regards, Chris. PS, I didn’t make the contested edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7C:B430:F300:657A:3C9B:37A7:B7C6 (talk) 18:06, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 * That's exciting to hear. Since it's a very specific block, unless you are the editor it's intended for it's unlikely to affect you. I will continue adding partial blocks for that editor as needed. Partial blocks are great for avoiding too much collateral damage. I'm also pretty handy with edit filters as that user has no doubt noticed. Happy editing! OhNo itsJamie  Talk 18:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay, makes sense. Thanks for responding. Chris (not logged in to my account due to being away and using someone else’s machine). 2A02:C7C:B430:F300:657A:3C9B:37A7:B7C6 (talk) 19:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Special:BlockedExternalDomains
As a regular spam-blacklist helper I wanted you to be aware of the new tool for blocking external domains. This should be used in lieu of MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist for simple requests to block entire domains when no exceptions will need to be made. Blocking parts of domains, anything with regexen, and anything where the whitelist will be needed will still use the old process.

For more information see T337431 and mw:Manual:BlockedExternalDomains. Stifle (talk) 08:21, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Great, thank you for the heads up! Do you know if Beetstra's BLHandler is being updated to use it? OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:55, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I am not aware that it is. Stifle (talk) 13:27, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Vandalic IP 2.24.250.74
HI! I noticed that you have blocked the IP subject from modifying this page for vandalism. That's why I came here to ask for your help regarding it, since it is repeatedly vandalizing the Drag Race Philippines (season 2) page, disregarding all the rules and compromises made on the talk page. So we kindly ask for your help to avoid yet another edit war within the page. I thank you in advance. :) Dominikcapuan (talk) 21:56, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I partial-blocked a range of IPs, not that user specifically. This looks like a content dispute, not vandalism. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:09, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

I'm Sorry That Won't Happen
Hi it's Abdullah you removed my draft for a leather bags website. I didn't realized that it was considered spam. Just wanted a backlink from the worlds biggest encyclopedia wont happen again and thanks a lot for not adding this in the blacklist. Abdullah-Ibn-e-Akhtar (talk) 22:09, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Shanghai Maple
Hi, you blocked because of vandalism at Maple (marque) and related pages. They are back with another IP address, also in Brazil:. Thankful for your assistance.  Mr.choppers &#124;  ✎  16:59, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Who's your fan?
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bikini_Atoll&diff=prev&oldid=1165649985  –Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Probably an a disgrauntled coworker from Fermilab. Or perhaps a rival from the Faculty of Classics at Oxford? OhNo itsJamie Talk 03:18, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Rajput_Dynasties_of_Medieval_India_and_Pakistan
Hi, the article was in draft-space as it was not completed and was missing references. Someone moved it to main-space and since then I am editing it there. I kindly request you to move the page to drafts so that I can complete the article ans submit it later. The purview of the page is far more than List of Rajput dynasties and states, it is far more elaborative and covers much broader area. Even the title 'Rajput Dynasties of India and Pakistan' was given in hurry.

My only concern is if you feel necessary, please move my article to draftspace rather that put a redirect. Thanks. Kshatriya Yoddha (talk) 19:42, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Partial block of 2607:FB91:174F:9AEB:1544:BB1:BA38:FB0E
You instituted a partial block of Special:Contributions/2607:FB91:174F:9AEB:1544:BB1:BA38:FB0E. Can you please make it a full block? This editor has a long history of making abrasive and abusive comments directed at other editors via various talk pages and the latest contributions on August 6 show that behavior has returned.— JlACEer ( talk ) 05:21, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * /40 is a huge range; a full block would likely affect many good-faith IP users. We do sometimes block ranges that large (or larger), but only when the majority of edits from that range are disruptive. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 11:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Can you at least block the current address? I'm tired of getting insulted on my own talk page.— JlACEer ( talk ) 15:59, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Never mind. It appears another editor has already done so.— JlACEer ( talk ) 18:35, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Just a quick note that this appears to have bled over to 2607:FB91:100E:213D:74FB:7159:B045:E135 in these edits. This additional range is also registered to T-Mobile in Detroit. It's without a doubt the same editor. The year 1870 in the disruptive edits refers to the founding year of Cedar Point amusement park, a point of contention this editor has made a big deal of in countless discussions at Talk:Cedar Point. --GoneIn60 (talk) 07:04, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Sock accounts of Kamal Afghan01
A sock account Kamal Afghan01 created an article "Battle of Nara" which was reverted back to draft after the user was blocked. A new account, Surajsingh09, confident its same person, moved the draft article to regular article name. See here. There are also other new accounts which overlap with Kamal Afghan01. They are RevolutionaryPatriot. The Contributions overlap with all previous sockaccounts of KamalAfghan01. See here. Clearly a duck. and. There are two more RTC710 and Khekom. How both take interest in making their first edits on a newly created article by sockpuppet Surajsingh09. See here and. I mentioned to Ponyo but he is out on vacation. 71.27.92.193 (talk) 21:38, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Protection of User talk:Emergency-user-slap
Hi, as the admin who protected the page User talk:Emergency-user-slap because the user didn’t exist, and this page kept being recreated, apparently this user now exists and has inappropriately added a few trout-related templates on a few pages. See their contrib history at Special:Contributions/Emergency-user-slap.

Could you please do something about this, possibly a WP:NOTHERE block and/or unprotect the page since the user apparently exists now? I can’t report them to WP:AN or WP:ANI because I can’t leave a notice on their protected user talk page. Thanks, Fork99 (talk) 08:38, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I trouted the hell out of that account. OhNo itsJamie Talk 12:45, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

KMart talk page IP
FYI, the Kmart talk page IP editor you've blocked a few times (for example ) is getting disruptive on the talk page again. - MrOllie (talk) 16:39, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your action. Didn't take long for them to shift to a new IP, though: - MrOllie (talk) 01:17, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

More of the same obvious block evasion again on Talk:Kmart ‎ by. The "You will never be rid of me" says it all. Meters (talk) 02:32, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
 * And now on Meters (talk) 06:49, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hope you don't mind me merging these sections User:Meters and User:MrOllie. I blocked another range, page is protected. Please continue to post any other IPs here and I'll be happy to block them, or range them if possible. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 13:39, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I didn't notice the duplicated sections until I after my second post. Meters (talk) 19:35, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Block on TP but not in block log
Hi Ohnoitsjamie, in this edit you informed that they were "blocked indefinitely", but there is no entry in their block log, and they are still vandalizing articles. Could you please activate the block ? - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 14:56, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks, that has been rectified. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Difficulty moving on from a stale issue
In regards to this: Village_pump_(policy)/Archive_153

I am having a difficult time moving on from this. I still very much believe Sergecross73 was abusing their administrative power in the situation concerning List of music considered the worst and The Abominable Wiki Troll's addition of Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band to it, with their insistence that the entry stayed on, on the grounds that it was giving TAWT the kind of attention and recognition they craved, and that they should not have gone unpunished for it. However, the issue is very much done and over with, and I feel that taking it to ArbCom wouldn't be in anyone's best interest. Any advice for how my justice-craving heart can move on from this? The Grand Delusion (Send a message) 23:37, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * What the hell? That dispute was years ago, I lost that argument and 100% dropped it years ago, and I didn't use administrative powers in that those disputes. Why in the world are you still obsessing over this today? None of this makes any sense. Sergecross73   msg me  23:52, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Because I feel like in that scenario, you were aiding a known long-term vandal, whether intentionally or otherwise, blatantly disregarding evidence that the entry was not originally added in good faith, and giving said long-term vandal the attention and recognition they craved. If you don't think to yourself that something's not right even after being presented with a mountain of evidence, then I think you're not doing your job as an admin. The Grand Delusion (Send a message) 00:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that fundamentally does not equate to the definition of Admin abuse. I merely restored the edits of a block evading editor on the grounds of WP:V, which is completely DENY-compliant. Now I ask you again, why are you obsessing, yet again, about a content dispute resolved 4 years ago? Especially after I warned you 2 years ago to stop harassing me about this? Twice even. I've never met someone so obsessed over harassing someone over a dead content dispute they won. This is completely baffling to me. Sergecross73   msg me  00:26, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm unfamiliar with this episode. I should note that as primary schooler SPLHCB was my favorite record, and during that time I also greatly enjoyed the movie, and as such have personal biases. That said, I don't object to the inclusion of the cheesy SPLHCB cover album on the current Worst as the sources for it's inclusion are good enough. ANYWAY, I respect both of you as editors, and I'd rather not get involved.  I can certainly understand the feeling of "unresolved injustices," but as I've aged I've become (somewhat) better at letting go of things and moving on. It's not always easy, but it's a great feeling when you can do it. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 13:45, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * That's fine, there's very literally nothing to be done here. I'm just trying to figure out why it keeps on coming up every couple years even though it's not a recurring debate. To my recollection, no one has attempted to add, or even argue, that the Beatles album to the list since 2019. It's not some perennial debate that keeps coming up, GrandDelusion just randomly brings it up in completely unrelated discussions. Sergecross73   msg me  13:53, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Manji Sahib
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Manji Sahib, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox/43&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Ohnoitsjamie&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1170505375 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:11, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manji_Sahib&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1170505375%7CManji%20Sahib%5D%5D Ask for help])

Noatak, Alaska
Two more edits and  Knitsey (talk) 17:50, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Reverting my edits, and protecting
Hello, I noticed you reverted my edit on Abu Tesht not just that but also protecting the page  even though I haven't vandalized anything, neither have I added wrong information, the information you reverted also didn't need any sources it was just geographical, so if you could tell me the reason for all of this I'd appreciate it, thanks. MohamedWhd (talk) 13:29, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure which edit you are talking about. Feel free to take you concerns to the article's talk page. OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:43, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Help with an editor on Live (band) article
Could you look over recent edits made between myself and User:Revirvlkodlaku at Live (band). All edits made by myself and others, whether helpful or not, are being reverted to their last edit and it’s approaching WP:OWN. The biggest bone of contention right now involves my deletion of three stacked images, of different sizes, directly under a heading. The images were placed there only three months ago and are an eyesore as they appear, especially on mobile devices. I’ve tried to explain and direct them to WP:STACKING in order to show why this is an issue, to no avail as they apparently see no issue with the images as they are placed. Thanks for any assistance or guidance you can provide. NJZombie (talk) 13:57, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * NJZombie is being overdramatic and disingenuous. As soon as they took the time to explain why stacked images are discouraged—something they merely mentioned previously as if it was fact—I did not revert back. User is just upset that I called them out on edit warring and immature behaviour. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:11, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Nice to see an attempt at conflict resolution devolve into name calling. Disingenuous would be stating that I never explained WP:STACKING previous to the final time which the edit history clearly shows I did. NJZombie (talk) 14:25, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to Cornell study on Wikipedia discussions
Hello Ohnoitsjamie,

I’m reaching out as part of a Cornell University academic study investigating the potential for user-facing tools to help improve discussion quality within Wikipedia discussion spaces (such as talk pages, noticeboards, etc.). We wanted to invite you to join the study because we noticed that you have experience dealing with NPA violations in your work as an administrator, as such, we feel like you might have a unique viewpoint that could be very valuable for this line of research.

The study centers around a prototype tool, ConvoWizard, which is designed to warn Wikipedia editors when a discussion they are replying to is getting tense and at risk of derailing into personal attacks or incivility. More information about ConvoWizard and the study can be found at our research project page on meta-wiki.

If this sounds like it might be interesting to you, you can use this link to sign up and install ConvoWizard. Of course, if you are not interested, feel free to ignore this message.

If you have any questions or thoughts about the study, our team is happy to discuss! You may direct such comments to me or to my collaborator, Cristian_at_CornellNLP. Thank you for your consideration.

--- Jonathan at CornellNLP (talk) 15:36, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you.
First, we apologize to the editors for the controversy.

I also wanted to end the argument.

Thank you for stopping this debate.

I'll try to reduce the editing arguments. Lades2222 (talk) 13:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Teresa Wright citation issue
I just noticed that in this edit some time ago you introduced a "ref name" parameter not previously defined, generating multiple error messages. Can you kindly fix? Thank you. Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 17:59, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * The only way to fix that is to turn all of those cites into "Cite needed" tags; the original ref to film-reference was blacklisted and removed. A bot kept trying to re-add the links, so I intentially broke the name so that the bot would stop filling up the blacklist logs. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 19:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

question about block of user Meless13
Hi ! User:Meless13 posted in this reddit thread seeking information on why they were blocked; I see from their talk page that block evasion is mentioned, but it's unclear what they did. It looks like they have two edits on English Wikipedia, some in French, Wikidata, etc. Nothing appears problematic to me, but I'm guessing you're able to see more as an admin?

FYI, I don't know them personally, just am following up from their questions on reddit. = paul2520 💬 22:27, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * They triggered a private edit filter that monitors LTAs. I'm not interested in looking at the reddit thread, but if they want to appeal their block they should read WP:GAB. OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:13, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Talk:Sassa Gurl
Hello, Ohnoitsjamie,

Could you look over this request on this talk page and consider changing the protection on the article page? I'm not sure why protection is restricted to template editors here. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 18:47, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I used to use "template protection" for WP:SALTing in situations where full protection seemed excessive based on advice I'd received years ago; I no longer do that as it tends to confuse people. I've lowered the protection to "semi" for now (I'm concerned that if I remove it entirely we may have unregistered users trying to recreate the article prematurely). OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * It still says template editor so could you redo this protection? Then I can create the redirect and not delete the talk page. Thanks! Liz Read! Talk! 05:10, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ Sorry, I guess I just unprotected the talk page the first time. OhNo itsJamie Talk 12:13, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Mano De Football
The game is finally noticeably on every website https://www.easy-party-ideas-and-games.com/ if you enter flag games it’s on here ZanerG35 (talk) 03:47, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Your indef block should be noticeable now. OhNo itsJamie Talk 12:37, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Interesting
I didn't know it did that. Useful to know for future socks, thanks. 2.48.51.222 (talk) 14:09, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Name change
Kindly move the article name to Iran men's national football team, because articles related to team redirect to Iran men's national football team (a non-existing page) instead of Iran national football team.AkephalostheHeadless (talk) 11:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
 * You can suggest the move on the article's talk page; if there is a consensus to move it, it will get moved. I'm not going to do it unilaterally. OhNo itsJamie Talk 12:05, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Other Names
Hi, I have seen that the recent edit on this page Suriya related to other names has been revoked from your side.

I would also like to bring into your notice, some of the other pages are still using it from where I have took a reference. Kindly take a look at the below pages and confirm:


 * 1) Vijay (actor)
 * 2) Rajinikanth

Heisenberg (talk) 02:52, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Kmart IP
Looks like the Kmart block evading IP finally noticed that the article's protection expired: MrOllie (talk) 19:17, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Morgan Radford's children
Hello there, I noticed that you've changed my edit regarding that she recently gave birth to a daughter in February as I've read it on the "Personal life" section. I just had to put the number of children even if I read it. Arieledits2000 (talk) 17:58, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Oops, my mistake; I've reverted myself (but removed the name per WP:BLPNAME). OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Helping to check draft articles
hello could you help to check my draft articles. Draft:Said Ahmad Draft:Edvard Rtveladze Xabibulla Muxamedov (talk) 10:54, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * You've already been given feedback on those drafts. You'll need to address the feedback. I don't know enough about those topics to be of further assistance. OhNo itsJamie Talk 11:35, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

RE: Page Protection.
Hey Jamie, I'm James. We have great names.

Thanks for your swift responses. I actually did both, applying for increased page protection and reported them for edit warring as they surpassed 3RR/qualify as someone with "clear intent to persist". Last time I had an issue, I tried both, and 2-month semi-page protection was the solution that was chosen, perhaps because that was an uncommunicative IP address?

So I opted for both again, but I understand re: vandalizing being inappropriate..because they didn't mar it with malicious content. Hopefully my report will yield results, especially since they were vitriolic and quite threatening even. Ugh, people.

Regardless though, at least I understand for the future going forward what the correct avenue should be. --Cinemaniac86Dane_Cook_Hater_Extraordinaire 15:27, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Actor/Actress page restorations.
Thank you for that. Really appreciate it. I'm so relieved that I was in the right about the ampersand usage, too. Phew. Sry to spam your talk page, but..Just wanted to inquire about "I don't see how these edits are improvements"--if that was directed towards me or them, and if me, what in particular? Just some clarification that I could elaborate with on the talk page, if it's me. Or why I swapped 2 actors just to appease them, maybe..Futile effort. But If you meant their reverse edits, never mind. But again, thanks for handling that. --Cinemaniac86Dane_Cook_Hater_Extraordinaire 16:30, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Reverting my edit

 * Hi, you reverted my edit on the page John Felix Raj.
 * There was a controversy some times back. But it went upto the Supreme Court of India and the court verdict was on behalf of St. Xaviers University. I have proof of it. Please refer to the link below:
 * https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-refuses-to-entertain-plea-of-professor-dismissed-from-stxaviers-university-over-instagram-picture-232384
 * Even after Supreme Court (the highest judicial authority in India) has proven the allegation completely wrong, then why are you people spreading this wrong news across internet and trying to defame the concerned person and the university.
 * I can contact the concerned authority in the university and can even upload the supreme court verdict here if needed for proof. Please let me what documents of proof are needed to remove these wrong allegations. I will do the needful.
 * I can contact the concerned authority in the university and can even upload the supreme court verdict here if needed for proof. Please let me what documents of proof are needed to remove these wrong allegations. I will do the needful.
 * I can contact the concerned authority in the university and can even upload the supreme court verdict here if needed for proof. Please let me what documents of proof are needed to remove these wrong allegations. I will do the needful.

Thanks in advance Wiki orb2 (talk) 07:33, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Take it to the article's talk page, please. Regardless of the verdict of the case, the case in itself is still notable. OhNo itsJamie Talk 10:30, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

IP rangeblock
You've blocked 115.189.0.0/16 and that stops one of my mates from signing up for an account. I thought the easiest thing around it would be to:
 * temporarily unblock
 * my mate to get himself an account
 * reinstate the block

However, this didn't work. It still showed up as blocked. What am I doing wrong? What would you suggest?  Schwede 66  08:27, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * See WP:ACC; I loosened the block to allow account creation. OhNo itsJamie Talk 10:31, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I’ll get my mate to give this another go.  Schwede 66  15:18, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Same offender?
Hi Jamie. I think it was you to whom I have reported this user and you have acted on it several times in the past year or two. (Let me know if it doesn't ring any bells, in case I am misremembering). This user is almost certainly the same one who has been blocked many times before, for the same kinds of disruptive and/or unnecessary edits - the pattern and subject matter are identical. As you can see, many of their edits have already been reverted by other editors, but I think that they need to stop wasting everyone's time. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:13, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, definitely the same editor; see this list of ranges they use. OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Why was I banned?
Why was I banned for adding two photos to a Wikipedia page? I need to go back and edit this page to reword the caption Pinus brutia to Pinus sp. because its identification is still not 100% certain.Gallip pine (talk) 10:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Gallip pine, there's no indication you are either blocked or banned (which are two different things). What makes you think you are? --Yamla (talk) 10:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Page protection request
Hi, can you protect this page under arbitration enforcement Israel Palestine please? It is fresh and receiving heavy vandalism. Al-Ahli Arabi Baptist Hospital airstrike. Thank you. Ecrusized (talk) 18:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Black Kite beat me to it. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:35, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

MfD discussion template.
Regarding the template, sorry for deleting it. I deleted it because there was no link to the MfD discussion page then. Thanks for notifying.  Brachy 08  (Talk) 23:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Understood, thanks! OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:05, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Del Norte High School (San Diego)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Del Norte High School (San Diego), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Ohnoitsjamie&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1181584204 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:48, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Del_Norte_High_School_(San_Diego)&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1181584204%7CDel%20Norte%20High%20School%20(San%20Diego)%5D%5D Ask for help])

Talk page attacks
Hello, Ordinarily I would not reach out directly, but an IP has been attacking me on my talk page for the last half hour. Any chance you could take a look at my AIV request? Catalyzzt (talk) 14:00, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ Cheers, OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:02, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Maxwell Frost
Thanks for maintaining the integrity of the article and for removing commentary. &mdash; Mavi Light (talk) 03:42, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Sockpuppets
these all seem to be sockpuppets of this user you blocked two weeks ago. 0x Deadbeef →∞ (talk to me) 07:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Why did you remove info on OMVIC page?
It was truthful information with references to newspapers and government reports. Did you read the sources at all? Tswift89 (talk) 17:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
 * While you are blocked, you can read WP:SYNTH. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:18, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

About WP:LOGOUT editing
Hi Ohnoitsjamie,

I was editing behind a public IP 185.100.232.91 to circumvent local internet censorship while I didn't realized my login session had expired for half an hour. I'm quite aware of MOS:DAB and fixing the format of dab pages with a (disambiguation) qualifier and missing entry of base name on its top per MOS:DABPRIMARY. I notice you reverted my edits on Forks (disambiguation), JPN (disambiguation), Loken (disambiguation), Coexist (disambiguation) and Matty (disambiguation). Thus, I would like to hear your advice about this.

Thanks, NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 14:52, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Not every disambig needs a primary topic, and I fail to see how any of those meet primary topic criteria. Fork and Coexistence do, but those are already separate disambig pages; other grammatical forms do need need to have the same primary topic. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 14:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not arguing that these dab pages must have a primary topic while the base name is automatically a primary topic if they have a "(disambiguation)" qualifier. However, if it really has no primary topic, it should be moved to the base name per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 15:01, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I disagree; all of those disambig pages are fine the way they are. Disambig policies and guidelines are based on improving navigation for likely use cases; none of your changes represent obvious improvements. There are thousands of other improvements that can be made to Wikipedia; adding primary topics to those pages is not useful.OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:05, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I fail to see your actual argument for reverting. Have you really read these guidelines? Did you enjoy reverting these edits simply because they were made by ip? You can't use none of your changes represent obvious improvements as an excuse to issue an edit warring here. Please read WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and MOS:DABPRIMARY before make more claims about this. If you are feeling embarrassed about this, I can sympathize. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 15:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Nothing to be embarassed about here. How did you determine that Matt Healy is the primary topic Matty? I'm not seeing any consensus for that here. I'm not interested in discussing further, as quibbling over redirects isn't worth this much of my time.OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Accusation of bad faith
I won't be making the edit in question again, but how was this vandalism? Look at Sweden_in_the_Eurovision_Song_Contest. 195.178.166.244 (talk) 03:12, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * My apologies, I misread the diff. The source is paywalled so I wasn't able to see if it supported the "worst" characterization, but I see now that your edit was not vandalism. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Still adding unsourced
Special:Contributions/France-Pt9301 it’s the repeated “can be seen as bring a presenter in the sense that he reminds viewers of voting instructions and brings the ceremony to life by sharing images from the dressing rooms” and similar that stands out. And  Doug Weller  talk 20:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Another sock?
Any chance you think the IP disruptive editing on Eva Colas is another sock of User:France-Pt9301? { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 22:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Possibly; blocked for disruption either way. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:23, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks ! We'll see if another one appears soon making the same exact edits. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 22:28, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Scandal of American Mathematics Competitions
Why are you and some other editors trying to hide the scandals of 2023 AMC 10/12A? Even MAA acknowledged the facts. Please see the important announcement of MAA's page https://maa.org/math-competitions. In this situation, do your guys still want to hide the scandal? Could you explain why? As I said, if my edit is not accurate, you can edit it but not to hide it. You can never hide a scandal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2620:160:EB08:0:0:0:0:B (talk) 16:05, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
 * It's not notable and not reliably sourced. Wikipedia is not a gossip forum. I'm not discussing it further with you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:08, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

the vandal who changes name/ages of people killed in accidents/disasters...
is back...please take a look at. I can't revert everything...thought you might want to take a look at it. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 04:00, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I think this is probably a repeat/SPA./LTA..something about adding errors to articles by altering/mispelling the names of the deceased people killed in mass deaths of almost any kind - accidents, disasters, mass murders, spree killings - and changing the ages of especially dead children (even though the ages are correct & cited before these odd changes). This editing seems purposeful and I have seen the exact same editing pattern somewhere - I think in "Bath School disaster" but can't quite find where/when it occurred. If I could search edit summaries on an article for the phrases "corrections of victims list"/"Number error"/"Name error" and similar wording then I might be able to suss out what I am almost certain is a LTA/SPA/POV/error-adding editor. At the very least I am going to ask for permanent auto-confirmed protection on the Bath School article. I sometimes do get tired of feeling like Sisyphus... Shearonink (talk) 03:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I added some edit filtering that should hopefully help. OhNo itsJamie Talk 12:33, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * You did? Thanks. I am pretty frazzled these days with personal stuff so appreciate all your help. Shearonink (talk) 20:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * There were some hits on November 13th. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:26, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah, the filters are private so I can't view them but thanks. Yeah, I know I have come across this SPA/LTA editing before...somewhere. They will even occasionally sprinkle some legit edits in amongst their odd alterations, one of their usual edits being altering ages by a year especially to children's ages in some disaster article. I keep an eye on some of the tragedy/disaster type articles, not because I am especially interested in these awful sad events but because I think our history shouldn't be mashed-up together with whatever is floating some vandal's boat... Thanks again. Shearonink (talk) 21:28, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh, you can't even see the filter hits when it's private? I was thinking that "private" just hid the rules definitions. The good news is the filter is working so far, and can easily be modified if they try to find ways around it. Let me know if any edits sneak through and I'll do so.OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:29, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Another one
Just thought I'd let you know that France-Pt9301 is back and left this message on my talk page. I really don't want to get involved or even know what to say so thought I'd let you know. <b style="color: #AB2B2B;">{ [ ( jjj</b> <b style="color: #000000;">1238 ) ] }</b> 22:51, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Inactivity for tennis players
When a tennis player becomes inactive after more then a year we add this on the top of the profile, check Qiang Wang (tennis). We also maintain a list of the inactive players on the 2023 WTA Tour page under Inactivity, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sashona (talk • contribs)
 * Who is "we"? I see you adding that to the lede sentence in articles, but haven't found examples of anyone else doing it. Is there a consensus for that somewhere? OhNo itsJamie  Talk 16:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by disruptive edit, in this case, can you elaborate? Sashona (talk • contribs)
 * I'm asking you where is the consensus to add "inactive" to the lede sentence of tennis players? You're saying "We add this" as if there is one; so far, you seem to be the only editor insisting on that convention. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 18:29, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * you said Pointless addition in your title comment, so was not sure how you determined that, and how it was that related to disruptive. We say “former” player for a retired player in the lede, but if not officially retired, not current playing and having no ranking, or a suspension, it is an inactive player.
 * Former/current is fine, but you should have a consensus to add "inactive." Where is your reliable for the word "inactive" applying to these players? The WTA doesn't use that term anywhere on her profile. You deciding that a player is "inactive" because they haven't played for a certain period sounds like WP:SYNTH unless you can provide sources for such a status.OhNo itsJamie  Talk 18:49, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * for example from the ATP website, https://www.atptour.com/en/players/-/d763/overview, also in Wikipedia we differentiate between Active vs Inactive players for example in the WTA records page. Also on the WTA tour] page.
 * WTA Tour records didn't differntiate until you started editing the page and differntiating it yourself. My point is that you seem to be making unilateral decisions in this regard. We have a special policy around WP:SPORTTRANS that loosely applies here; updating current statuses/teams on Wikipedia pages requires a WP:RS, not just your interpretation. You've tagged Jenson Brooksby as inactive, but his ATP profile does not say "Inactive."  OhNo itsJamie  Talk 21:35, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I did not make any edits to the WTA Tour record page. There was a column already for active players. Brooksby is currently suspended for the rest of the 2023 season and beyond, that makes him inactive.
 * I meant the 2023 WTA Tour; it was you who introduced a discrete section for inactivity. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:42, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I moved the already existing Inactivity section under the Retirement section as the definition for inactive was included under Retirement.

Mistaken page protection?
PrestonPlayz was salted by you but I think you made a mistake there in how you protected it? Clovermoss 🍀 (talk) 22:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Not a mistake; years ago, I was in the habit of using template protection as a slightly less restrictive measure then full, and I could've sworn there was a guideline around it but I haven't been able to find it, and as such I've stopped using that level. Is there an issue with that level at the moment where it needs to be increased/decreased? OhNo itsJamie  Talk 22:47, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Nope, not at all. I was having a discussion with friends on discord about when our birthdays are and the famous and not so famous people we share them with. That guy came up and then we were all a bit confused about why that page would be restricted to template editors if the purpose was salting. So I figured I'd ask if it was intentional. Clovermoss 🍀  (talk) 22:50, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Template-salt in mainspace?. Thank you. You are recieving this semi-automated notification because you template-protected a page in mainspace. This is not an indicator of any wrongdoing on your part. Queen of AWB (talk) 00:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

UTRS appeal
Hi, Ohno. There's an unblock request on UTRS from a person on an IP in a range which you have blocked. The range is 80.233.32.0/19. The appellant claims not to have edited before, and I don't see any reason not to assume good faith. Looking at the appalling editing history, I don't think that there's any question of removing the block, but do you think making it anon-only might be an option? JBW (talk) 19:56, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

The particular IP address is 80.233.32.0, which has never edited. JBW (talk) 19:59, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I just enabled account creation on that range which hopefully will be OK. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:23, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I will let them know. JBW (talk) 13:09, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

This user is trying to make others edit on their behalf
199.185.65.6 is trying to make other people edit on their behalf, and although they are blocked, they still have their talk page privileges. They are doing the same thing to me as 24.114.27.103 did to me not that long ago. Gamerknowitall (talk) 18:54, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Blocked, TPA revoked. Thanks! OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:13, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:20, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Editor experience invitation
Hi Ohnoitsjamie :) I'm looking to interview people here, feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss 🍀  (talk) 13:33, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

User adding unsourced claims is back
Hello Ohno,

I just wanted to let you know that the person adding and inserting unsourced claims is back at Hai Kun-class submarine. Previously you protected the page against this vandal, but it seems after a month he has returned and is inserting the exact same unsourced claims as before (see the major edit on 4 December 2023). I have restored the page to how it was before it was vandalized, however, if this person continues I hope you can step in like you did previously? Thanks in advance SailingthroughHistory (talk) 13:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I've added a partial rangeblock for 3 months; let me know if I need to add targets to that block besides the current one. OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:46, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Massanutten Military Academy
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Massanutten Military Academy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Ohnoitsjamie&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1188618744 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:10, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Massanutten_Military_Academy&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1188618744%7CMassanutten%20Military%20Academy%5D%5D Ask for help])

Kingdom of Sicily
I don't understand your action. The user is devastating the page with various registered new users viewable in history. You have the wrong user. The changes made by the registered user conflict with the Wikipedia articles of the respective historical periods (with lots of sources). The user made personal attacks. 2A02:B125:8F00:F619:61EB:561C:E112:4310 (talk) 17:44, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Please take your concerns to the article talk page. You are edit-warring without consensus. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:21, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Socks?
Can you check is these users are socks? User:Viishhaaal User:Dashan Ghasan User:AmNaTi200 User:Auhabeeb User:Ijick. Juvalkjolly (talk) 14:52, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Socks of who? I am not a Checkuser; you'd have to file a WP:SPI case; I don't see any glaringly obvious connection between them. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:55, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh, thanks. Juvalkjolly (talk) 14:57, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Special:AbuseLog/36564150
Is this intended behavior of the filter? I'm not super familiar with the circumstances that led to this filter's creation, though it doesn't quite look like vandalism. Some other related logs on this article can be found at Special:AbuseLog/36564137 and Special:AbuseLog/36522906. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 03:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * That filter functions as a partial block on a range without being limited to 10 targets. Those hits are not false positives; that user is stubbornly attempting to evade previous blocks. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 17:12, 15 December 2023 (UTC)


 * OK. Thank you for clarifying. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 03:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Rat Na
I don't think that was an appropriate G14 deletion. There's nothing prohibiting editors attempting a rewrite of an article to do so in Draftspace (though the AfC tag was indeed misguided). Also, as I commented on the talk page one of the users you blocked, they're unlikely to be socks, and this actually appears to be an undocumented school project. I raised this back in 2017, and meant to reach out to the instructor to explain how their assignment has been causing problems for Wikipedia, but never got around to actually doing so. I might have to revisit the issue soon.

In the Rat Na case, I think the best possible option would be to restore the draft and direct the user to keep working on it until it's of acceptable quality (or until they lose interest). --Paul_012 (talk) 16:33, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I've undeleted the draft, but will continue to block new accounts who attempt to unilaterally move it to mainspace without approval. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Edit filter 1164
I can't view it, but the number of hits on it since the last edit to it seems to be rather disproportionate. Is this intentional, or is it bugging out? Drowssap SMM  15:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Edit filter 1164
I think you might have messed up there. Nobody ( talk ) 15:14, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you, disabled for now. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Disruptive editing?
I see a pattern of addition of unsourced material by a user. Look at my changes to removed such changes from: American University of the Caribbean and Brooklyn Hospital Center among various edited pages by same user. MedGME (talk) 00:38, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Same user continues to update articles based on news of questionable relevance many of which he adds to the "controversies" section of the articles. E.g. ...""short seller nicknamed 'The Assassin,' takes aim at for-profit college giant Adtalem"... Wikipedia is not a tabloid. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adtalem_Global_Education&diff=prev&oldid=1207741415

Rather than concentrate on material worthy of Wikipedia, the user consistently emphasizes recent news, a severe case of "recentism". I have tried to revert such changes but hopefully you can suggest other ways to handle this issue. MedGME (talk) 23:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Season's Greetings
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Hello there! Shearonink (talk) wishes you & yours the very best of the season!

Whether you celebrate Christmas, Diwali, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, Festivus (for the rest of us!) or even the Saturnalia, here's hoping your holiday time is wonderful and - especially -

that the New Year will be an improvement on the old. CHEERS!

Share these holiday wishes by adding   to your friends' talk pages.

(Sent: 16:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC)) Shearonink (talk) 16:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * A belated thanks, User:Shearonink; I hope you and your furry friends are enjoying the holidays. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Regarding an IP user you partially blocked
Hi! A few days ago, you blocked Special:Contributions/223.123.91.142 from a handful of Pakistan related articles. I'm unsure how dynamic the IP range is, but they've now begun editing at Hasan Abdal if it's of any relevance to the sockpuppeting or vandalism, hopefully this will help. Otherwise, feel free to ignore this. Happy holidays! Schrödinger&#39;s jellyfish (talk) 06:17, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
 * The editor targeted by that partial block was engaging in tiresome tribe/caste edit-warring, probably not the same editor; that's a fairly large range. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 20:05, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Reversion of deeply offensive material
I have reverted a recent message here on the basis that I viewed it as deeply offensive. Over to you if you wish for revdel, or even to reinstate it since it shows the IP editor up completely. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:17, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you! OhNo itsJamie  Talk 19:30, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Filter 1242
See when you can get a chance. Thanks! Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 21:56, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 * For security purposes could you just confirm here that it was indeed you who made the request to join the edit filter mailing list? Sam Walton (talk) 10:21, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, that was me. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Ohnoitsjamie!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em; height:auto; min-height:173px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! Ohnoitsjamie, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Abishe (talk) 15:11, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 15:11, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks, you as well! OhNo itsJamie Talk 12:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

RE: ChatGTP to formulate an unblock request
All the cool kids are doing it. 😜 -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:44, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that was some good stuff. I was tempted to write a decline using ChatGPT, but decided against it. ;) OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:16, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

thailawonline.com
Back in June 2023, you blocked and warned an editor that continued spamming of this URL would result in it being blacklisted. I've just blocked User:Sebastienenthailande for spamming the same URL. I've purged the link from mainspace, but I thought I'd give you a heads up. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:42, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I keep my promises. OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:25, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Blocking vandal IP
Hi there, I’m Daeva. Could you block this IP from my talk page. That guy keeps creating a mess in my talk page. Thanks — Daeva Trạc (talk) 16:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I'd prefer not to fully block that large range, but I've made some adjustments such that they won't be leaving any more messages on your talk page. Let me know if they cause disruption elsewhere. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

PetalPath
For your amusement: Sockpuppet investigations/Miyera20. I don't know how this wasn't noticed before. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107;
 * Apparently we need to bring back MySpace so people have something to extensively decorate on the web. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:54, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Protect Claudette Colvin’s Page
Hello - could you please add a protection to Claudette Colvin’s page, as you did two years ago? Please let me know if you’d like to chat about this request - if there’s a way for me to email you or if you prefer to email me. Thank you. SpeakersBureau200167 (talk) 06:42, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 * You may get a faster response to a protection request by posting it to WP:RFPP. 331dot (talk) 10:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Regarding blocked topics
My edit was reverted due to Wikipedia not being a 'restaurant directory' on Lyndhurst's page but there was already restaurants previously there and there's currently one as well. Why am I being persecuted for adding information of relevance? Please advise. Biggly (talk) 15:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Openings of chain restaurants are generally not notable. The sources you included do not meet WP:RS guidelines. The Mazur's has received independent 3rd party coverage in news outlets including the New York Times. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

the My Salad addition did have a source however.
 * Please read WP:RS. Your first source was WP:PRIMARY and second soure, "boozyburbs.com" is a blog.OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

"Nothing"
I see that you have declined my request to increase page protection of Nothing, citing lack of disruptive activity. How much disruptive activity/vandalism is warranted for an increase of page protection? PicoMath (talk) 03:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your block of 216.125.0.0/16
Hi Jamie, see this block log; when removing talk page access on the original three-year school block by Materialscientist (who happened to revert an edit to Lyman Beecher by this IP on my watchlist), did you intend to change the block length to 72 hours? I've restored the block and reset the block length for another three years, because it seems clear that nothing good is coming from this range being allowed to edit. Graham87 (talk) 03:29, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * And I also undid the block of 216.125.37.34 because I widened the block to the whole /16. Graham87 (talk) 03:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Changing the block length to 72 hours was definitely a mistake on my part, not sure how that happened. Apologies for the inconvenience, and thanks for letting me know! OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Can i ask why my ip is blocked from editing information about televisions?
I'm not the recipient of this block but I guess i share an IP with the blocked person? 2001:8003:E461:F901:8492:684D:3332:3080 (talk) 13:36, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Given that this is a very limited block, I'd say it's highly likely that you are the intended recipient. OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

People who have been considered deities
Hi Jamie, I've now requested 3O as discussed: Mathi80 (talk) 19:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Talk:List_of_people_who_have_been_considered_deities. Ideally an independent scholar to give an indication please on whether it is consensus today that Jesus did claim being God himself, or whether deification was only attributed to him after leaving earth. 19:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Problem users January 2024
Hello my friend. Sadly I need to request a block for who's blown far past WP:3RR WP:OR WP:RS. He has been warned extensively on the article Talk page for Apple community and on his own Talk page that everything he's doing is categorically unencyclopedic. This guy does not believe in any rules or respect whatsoever, is a fansite person, and is WP:NOTHERE. He has edit warred a dump of trivia about Shazam with no sources at all. It's all on my User Talk page warnings to him. Once he even littered Lewis and Clark Expedition with a section dedicated to one unsourced sentence about a travel brand with their name. Just on Apple community alone I'm pretty sure he's up to five instances of edit warring of the same content, surrounding before and after he was exhaustively instructed on the article Talk page and templated on his User Talk page which he simply reverted and repeated. Thank you. — Smuckola(talk) 20:14, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
 * That's completely unfounded. I added extra links during reinstating this section and a whole load of other tidying up editing, while you instantly removed it without even bothering to either check properly nor asking me about them. Rude behaviour. As for "is a fansite person" means what exactly? Apart from being rude again (then using one addition to Lewis and Clark Expedition from MONTHS ago to help make your case, is pretty low behaviour too!) Jimthing (talk) 20:20, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Qeustion
Can I report true positive hits of Special:AbuseFilter/1094 directly to AIV? Just wondering since I've encountered a few on WP:EFFP that you block. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Sure, though in some cases it might not be obvious vandalism; many of those target LTAs and may appear innocuous. If you're familiar with the LTA feel free to identify it as such on the AIV template. Looking at hits from the last few months, there's about a 5% or less false positive rate. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:06, 29 January 2024 (UTC)


 * You are allowed to use talk pages if you use them appropriately. If you post anything about Brighton/city status, you will be blocked immediately per WP:DROPTHESTICK. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

IP user 158.62.50.158
Sir I think this IP user is mine when I started here last year and I don't know tht time how to used Wikipedia... because as I visited the IP user has been partially blocked and when I'm not logged in my account and as unanimous it said this IP has been blocked...can U unblocked please 🥺 thanksRc ramz (talk) 15:14, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * What page were you trying to edit when you saw the block notice? OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:17, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * In Mister International and I went to talk page & I saw some comments and checked when I clicked on the IP then check the history I saw it was blocked from this page Beijing Ducks.Rc ramz (talk) 04:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Polemicising IP
Hi! , who you blocked, may need a talk page block added on top (if you look at their talk page edit history). AntiDionysius (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

James Baldwin blocks
I think 77.101.157.93 has been wrongly blocked for edits on James Baldwin. Their single edit is legitimate, and indeed is still part of the article. The other blocked IPs did vandalize the article, of course. Ttwaring (talk) 04:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Unblocked. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

You put a one year block on 174.214.48.0/22 for several articles (Deputy, Indiana, Talk:Deputy, Indiana, Talk:Ku Klux Klan members in United States politics, Talk:Leaders of the Ku Klux Klan and Talk:Ku Klux Klan) but we've had 6 garbage edits from this one IP. I was about to do a block on it, but decided to bring it to you instead, as I don't want to walk on your carefully crafted ip range block. Dennis Brown 2&cent; 10:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with expanding the block to full. I make an effort to limit collateral damage, but the vandalism expands beyond limited targets, it's unavoidable. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Suicide Squad: Kill The Justice League
Hello. Can you take a look at the current edit dispute between me and Rambling Rumbler on the Suicide Squad: Kill The Justice League page. The claim that the writing and story was "praised" is disputable, at best, and it's left completely uncited.

I want a non-involved third party involved in this. ShirtNShoesPls (talk) 03:51, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Sorry this has randomly shoved onto your talkpage to deal with. The user above has been engaged in a days long campaign at the article in question to effectively railroad their POV that basically seems to be their demand the article declare the game is being overall terribly received because it killed Batman. The user was only a couple of days ago blocked for edit-warring with another user on the same article (which for disclosure I reported), where it was observed by multiple people this user has a WP:IDHT problem and tries to claim policy supports them when it doesn't. I really am at my wit's end at this point as I really don't know what to do at this point while avoiding a 3RR situation given I've tried to engage with them on the talkpage of the article (even as they've accused me of deliberately ignoring sources even though said source was published days after the edits they were upset at me over), and when they've added sources but badly used them as part of the POV-pushing I've tried to fairly structure them into the article but they've wholesale refused any interest in that sort of compromise. Frankly I think the fact they've come here asking for you to resolve the dispute only to continue their own editing speaks volumes to how I don't think they want a third-party to amicably resolve it so much as hoping an admin will help shove through their POV. Rambling Rambler (talk) 04:31, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Please use WP:3. This is a topic area I'm not interested in weighing into at the moment. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:31, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Blocked IP 114.76.224.0/21
Hi Jamie, You blocked the above IP for 2 years back in December, but you seem to have inadvertently blocked me too (and I'm guessing a bunch of other people as well). I haven't edited anything here for years, and eventually had to remember my ID and password from roughly 20 years ago in order to edit something. If you could have another look at that block, I'd appreciate it. Thank you.
 * I'm not going to unblock that range, as most of the edits from it are from an WP:LTA. Users affected by the block can log in with an account as you have done here. OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi Jamie, Thank you for your reply. The only reason I was could log on (and hence comment on your talk page) was because I already had an ancient account, and fortunately eventually remembered the password. If I hadn't remembered that password (from ~20 years ago) I would have been blocked altogether, as you cannot either create an account or set a new password when blocked. Others in the same IP range with no existing account (or with a forgotten password or ID) would effectively be blocked from doing anything but read Wikipedia for 2 years. This doesn't seem appropriate, particularly given the person you intended to block is probably already off happily editing using a VPN. Again, could you please have a look at this for me. Many thanks :)  Oracle7  16:05, 29 February 2024 (AEST)
 * One could make that argument for any rangeblock; sorry, but no. Other users affected by the block can use WP:ACC or UTRS if they are having issues with a forgotten password OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:57, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Blocked IP 2A02:C7C:644B:6700:ED8C:C63:ACF1:C9F5
Hello Jamie. You partially blocked IP 2A02:C7C:644B:6700:ED8C:C63:ACF1:C9F5 on 30 January from editing several articles. The user has resumed their disruptive behaviour with yet another article, with this edit on the Gary Hailes article. Perhaps extending the block to all articles or, at a minimum, adding the Gary Hailes article to the partial block list? Many thanks! Geoff &#124; Who, me? 14:22, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * That's a huge range, and I'd rather avoid blocking the whole thing, especially based on a single edit. I've warned the IP for now. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Adshead123
Hey Jamie. For pages targeted by Adshead, can you try pending protection rather than semi protection? Protection simply causes him to expand targets it seems. Unfortunately, I've not been able to formulate any sort of effective range block for this case. -- ferret (talk) 17:35, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Will do. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:57, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh, pending changes isn't available for talk pages; I don't think it should be an issue to just semi Talk:Andrew Simone will it? OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:05, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I have several other targets watchlisted but he's slowly expanded :( Unfortunately honeypotting may be our best option if we don't want to protect 50-60 articles. -- ferret (talk) 18:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I also have an edit filter that he's been tripping daily. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:27, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

LTA report copy request
Hi Jamie, would you be willing to email me the deleted contents of this LTA report. I am currently compiling a WMF global ban request against them and that report would be very useful. Thanks, v/r - Seawolf35 <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">T--C 20:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I simply restored the page for now. My original rationale for deletion turned out later to be a mistake.  There still may be an argument to be made for WP:DENY, but I'll leave future deletion to someone else. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 20:11, 16 February 2024 (UTC)


 * That works too, thanks. v/r - Seawolf35 <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">T--C 03:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

A goat for you!
Bravo! You're a fine writer.

Drmies (talk) 18:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC) <br style="clear: both;"/>

Could you lend a hand?
Can you help me over at my talk page? I currently have two issues going on. First is a random IP editor (190.219.223.169) that is leaving me and other editors random strange messages on talk pages. I also have an editor that I've warned over WP:COI at multiple accounts, harassing me at my talk page. Would you be able to at least temporarily protect my page for while? Thanks! NJZombie (talk) 20:39, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your assistance with this. However, since your warning for harassment, they have moved from the account you warned over to their original account at User:Siddharthmenon2121 and have continued to harass another editor by soliciting their personal information. NJZombie (talk) 12:48, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

About block another troll
Greetings, i'm more active in Spanish Wikipedia, but we've found several IP and accounts created by. The last example was in the article 2024 United Nations Biodiversity Conference, with the IP 190.219.223.169. Now, we have certain doubts about this. Please, could you check it? Sincerely yours, Pichu VI (talk) 14:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Please, block that f** account which is trolling my profile. It was blocked in Spanish. Pichu VI (talk) 20:46, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Revdel
Apologies - not sure if this number was an intentional or accidental addition. Revert if I over-reacted. Sam Kuru (talk) 23:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you, that was a stray paste on my part, though nothing particularly sensitive. Cheers, OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * That's strange about my email; I have "set a local exception" checked for emails, which I thought meant that en.wiki users could still email me (90% of en.wiki emails I get and 99.9999% of other wiki project emails I get are some level of garbage). OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Awesome; just wanted to make sure it wasn't the combination for your Scrooge McDuck money vault. Sam Kuru (talk) 00:36, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

WP:NOTBROKEN
Looks like 86.147.210.162 has been doing the same type of editing behaviour as 86.191.233.190, wouldn't be fully surprised if it is the same person. This time the changes mostly affects the Radio 5 Live link. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 22:57, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you, blocked! OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:07, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

I am not banned so leave me alone 78.86.131.251 (talk) 17:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Am i aloud to use the talk pages or are you going to keep bothering me 78.86.131.251 (talk) 17:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

I wouldn't want to chat you anyway you rude man 78.86.131.251 (talk) 17:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * You are allowed to use talk pages if you use them appropriately. If you post anything about Brighton/city status, you will be blocked immediately per WP:DROPTHESTICK. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

PP request on WP:REFB redirect
Hey, I saw you declined the RPP on the redirect page WP:REFB at Special:Diff/1209635636 but then did increase it later at Special:Diff/1209663907. Was there something you saw on elsewhere on the project or on the backend that made you change your mind? I ask cause I'm not super regular at RPP and was just hoping to improve my future patrolling. Thanks, microbiology Marcus (petri dish·growths) 19:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I'd mistakenly initially only looked at the edit history of the target, not the redirect itself. After I realized that, I saw no compelling reason for anon edits on the redirect. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Question
Hello you nominated SML (YouTube channel) for deletion, how long is the deletion discussion going to last. PrincessJoey2024 (talk) 00:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * One week. See Guide_to_deletion. Had you heeded my earlier warning, you could have saved yourself wasting all of that time. OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:49, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you and im sorry I will go read it. PrincessJoey2024 (talk) 00:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC)