User talk:Oil painting art

Oil Painting Reproduction
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Oil Painting Reproduction, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.art-ych.com/oil-painting-news/html/407.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:03, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Oil Painting Reproduction
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Oil Painting Reproduction, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Oil Painting Reproduction appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Oil Painting Reproduction has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:05, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

oil painting reproduction
If you wrote the original article then you need to go to Requesting copyright permission and email the address given there. They will be able to confirm that you were the original author and that it's OK to post on Wikipedia. As the material was copied from somewhere I can't just restore the material to Wikipedia as the encyclopedia would then be violating your copyright. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 03:23, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Oil Painting Reproduction
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Oil Painting Reproduction, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.art-ych.com/oil-painting-news/html/407.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:24, 11 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, Lewis. "CambridgeBayWeather" gave you the same answer I would have given you.  Unless you release the copyright on your own site, we simply cannot post it here.  In cases such as these, I recommend against doing so.  If you give permission for the content to be posted here, you effectively void your own copyright.  The other matter is conflict of interest.  You can write about the project in your own words, but it must be done so in a neutral tone as outlined at the link.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 07:25, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Techniques of oil painting preservation
A tag has been placed on Techniques of oil painting preservation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fbifriday (talk) 07:41, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Techniques to hang an Oil painting


The article Techniques to hang an Oil painting has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a how-to guide.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 07:58, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Regarding your additions to Oil painting
As two other editors have pointed out, Wikipedia can not accept material from other websites that have a copyright mark. Even though you may have written the original material, as long as the original material is copyrighted, it can not be copied into Wikipedia. Please stop adding such copyrighted material. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:11, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

March 2010
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. JNW (talk) 01:47, 18 March 2010 (UTC)