User talk:Oiseleur~enwiki

A tag has been placed on Institut Jules Bordet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. LittleOldMe 17:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Marc Lacroix, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. LittleOldMe 17:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

""Oiseleur"" I placed a (hangon) on this artical for you. But you are going to have to supply additional bio information or it will be deleted. Good Luck Shoessss 17:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you Shoesss ! I will provide additional information about the biography and work of Marc Lacroix. I need two to three days to collect these data. Is this lapse of time acceptable? Oiseleur 17:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)


 * When writing encyclopedic entries (unlike news reports or articles which remain current for a brief period) it is good to state the year rather than the elapsed time. For example, the statement:


 * "He has been working at Institut Jules Bordet (Brussels, Belgium) for over fifteen years."


 * should perhaps be rewritten as:


 * "He began working at Institut Jules Bordet (Brussels, Belgium) in 1991."


 * The reader is then able to calculate the elapsed period based on the current date. Stating the elapsed time makes it neccessary to keep updating the article as time elapses. Regards LittleOldMe 15:00, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Marc Lacroix
My comment on the Talk page sems to have gone ignored, so I'll bring it here: Do you really need 27 sources for a single line? --Scorpios 01:33, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Oiseleur. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Oiseleur~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 02:13, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:10, 22 April 2015 (UTC)