User talk:Oitio

Speedy deletion nomination of Retrotope
Hello Oitio,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Retrotope for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Natureium (talk) 22:13, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

As reviewing admin, I put on a tag that will postpone deletion for a day or two. But please see WP:NCORP. General experience has been that a single phase I drug is unlikely to make a company notable.  DGG ( talk ) 22:27, 10 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Shall we add more information about these orphan (rare) but debilitating and life-shortening, while not affecting cognition, neurodegeneration disorders to this article? The drug is single but it represents a fundamentally novel approach (heavy isotope nutrient) to otherwise incurable conditions. And it is not a recent development (WP is not news) - it has been in development over many years and now got to the stage of FDA approval and clinical trials with published results. Oitio (talk) 23:03, 10 April 2018 (UTC)


 * I think the chemical is notable; the company is not. I'm going to list it for afd in a few days  unless there are refs about the company itself that meet WP:NCORP.  DGG ( talk ) 04:24, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Found and added a couple of references (the opening paragraph). Oitio (talk) 11:15, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Decoy-building spider has been accepted
 Decoy-building spider, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Legacypac (talk) 03:18, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Decoy-building_spider help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Disambiguation link notification for January 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Isotope effect on lipid peroxidation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Isotope effect. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deuterated drug, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Protium.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Latin-British Exhibition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cable car.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Oitio. Thank you for your work on Chain reactions in living organisms. User:Alpha3031, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Alpha3031 (t • c) 13:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello Alpha3031. Why did you remove the content of the article and did not copy it to the section in chain reactions? Oitio (talk) 22:14, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello Oitio. I mostly expected much of the coverage to remain on the articles on the individual chain reactions (e.g. lipid peroxidation) and thus had not fully considered whether more coverage would be appropriate at chain reactions. On review, I do now consider this a slight oversight, so thank you for your comment. I expect I will be able to copy some of it over in the next few hours, but in the meantime, if you would like to access a saved copy of what was there before (in case you do not know how) you may find it here. (I also apologise for not letting you know where this would be available before) Please do not hesitate to let me know if you have any further questions. Alpha3031 (t • c) 09:32, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your comment. I can move the content but I am not convinced that the chain reactions in living organisms belong to the article that is explicitly about chain reactions in physics. It is a separate issue and I would prefer to see it as a separate article, maybe a list but two items are too few for a list. Oitio (talk) 14:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I was pointed out to an article in a foreign scientific journal specifically devoted to the topic: Chain reactions in organic chemistry and biology. It justifies a separate article in wikipedia; other examples of chain reactions from that article should be added. Oitio (talk) 14:00, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I've reversed the redirection for now if you want to add things in or just put a link somewhere, but please note that there are sometimes advantages in covering a topic as part of a broader parent article. The currently designated scope of the chain reaction article covers chemistry as well as physics, but it makes sense for there to at least be a summary, if not outright extending the article to fully cover the concept across the natural sciences. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:28, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Oitio. Thank you for your work on Tom Brenna. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 08:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC)