User talk:Oktocalok

As no one has educated you
about WP:EDITWARring, I guess I will. Not just edit warring. Maybe assuming good faith and not casting WP:ASPERSIONS, as you did on the article talk page. Instead of making up ridiculous personal attacks, as you did, it would be better to use the talk page to discuss content and sourcing. The nonsense you wrote on that talk page merited an indefinite block. So, please control yourself. I'll lay the standard template below for you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Ambox warning pn.svg You have been engaged in an edit war. This means that you were repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --  Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:20, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

cross post as a point of reference
is closed.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:24, 2 March 2023 (UTC)