User talk:Olaf Davis

ABC Preon Model
Hello, Olaf Davis. Four or five years ago you made the decision to delete the ABC Preon Model page. Since that time, I have published a second reviewed article that references the original reviewed article. As described in that second publication, the evidence continues to mount, as with three free parameters 18 high energy physics events are predicted. Of those 18, 9 have been found. However, the issue for deletion was not veracity, but rather, notability. Five years ago there was not a lot of secondary references. Today however, if one does a Google search on the "ABC Preon Model" one gets 40,000 results returned. So my question is this - are 40,000 Google search results enough for something to be considered notable? If so, I'd like to put the article back up.

Thanks,

Delbert7 (talk) 11:13, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Undelete ABC Preon Model
Back in 2014, there may have not been much notability.But now, the subject has more notability. Please restore ABC Preon Model. It will help more people know about it. Happy editing! 24.205.150.243 (talk) 01:08, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Deletion review for ABC Preon Model
An editor has asked for a deletion review of ABC Preon Model. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 24.205.150.243 (talk) 01:39, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi
I see that you recently made one of your (now) rare edits, and I thought I would say "hello". I still edit regularly, though at a small fraction of the rate at which I used to edit. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:53, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)