User talk:Olaflegend

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  κaτa ʟ aveno TC 07:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Doing great!
No need to worry about mistakes as they are easily fixable. You are doing great BTW. You have already made many excellent edits. If you have any questions about anything, please don't hesitate to ask me or any other editor. Cheers!  κaτa ʟ aveno TC 14:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to BBC_7
Hi again... thanks for the note. The same thing has happen to me before, too. In a few articles, I edited some sentences and improved grammar. Later, though, my changes were reverted. In your case, it is unfortunate that the other editor (User:Briantist) reverted ALL your changes rather just the "passive voice" change. You have to trust me, however, when I say that these kinds of editing experiences are the exception rather than the rule. In most cases, at least in my experience editing, my edits have been retained. I'm sorry that you feel put off by this experience. It is your choice, obviously, but I hope that you do decide to do more editing. Wikipedia can only improve by having caring and meticulous editors like you around. Take care!  κaτa ʟ aveno TC 13:55, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Allison Ferns
An editor has nominated Allison Ferns, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bobbie Pryor


The article Bobbie Pryor has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Nothing here confirms notability. She reads traffic reports on the radio and there is nothing to show general notability from independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Egghead06 (talk) 16:28, 14 March 2017 (UTC)