User talk:Olaniyanmat

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Medicine WikiProject!


Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Medicine (also known as WPMED). We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of medical articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are interested in editing medical articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing Wikipedia articles are:


 * Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on our talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the WPMED talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
 * Sourcing of medical and health-related content on Wikipedia is guided by our medical sourcing guidelines, commonly referred to as MEDRS. These guidelines typically require recent secondary sources to support information; their application is further explained here. Primary sources (case studies, case reports, research studies) are rarely used, especially if the primary sources are produced by the organisation or individual who is promoting a claim.
 * The Wikipedia community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot of discussion that happens under the scenes and through the bold, revert, discuss editing cycle. If you encounter any problems, you can discuss them on an article's talk page or post a message on the WPMED talk page.

Feel free to drop a note on my talk page if you have any problems. I wish you all the best on your wiki voyages! Zefr (talk) 15:06, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Source quality and formatting
Professor : If you're going to edit medical content on Wikipedia, please learn how to choose encyclopedic sources, described above in the video (click under 'Bold') and the guide, WP:MEDRS. You also need to learn how to format sources, described in WP:MEDHOW. If you need discussion about these guidelines, you can ask questions here. Good luck. --Zefr (talk) 15:09, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Olaniyanmat, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nutritional immunology, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 15:31, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Nutritional immunology


The article Nutritional immunology has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Single sentence article, no citations, no references, no categories."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 15:31, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Olaniyanmat. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Watermelon, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. While your own research may be what you are most familiar with, I caution against citing yourself exclusively (or even mostly), as it will appear to others that you are not here to build an encyclopedia but rather to advance your own interests and profile. Enwebb (talk) 15:26, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Dear Sir, I've stopped adding unsourced or poorly sourced information. Kindly unblock me Prof. Mathew Folaranmi OLANIYAN Olaniyanmat (talk) 12:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

November 2019
Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Watermelon. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''You are inserting your own publications - which are preliminary research, typically published in unreliable journals. This is not only a conflict of interest and biased editing (WP:NPOV), but is disruptive, causing other editors to clean up after you. You have not learned how to format a reference; see WP:CIT. Review these guidelines first before further editing. You are in danger of being blocked, and will be reported to admin if you continue this way. '' Zefr (talk) 16:09, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Likewise cucumber, corn silk, avocado, basella alba..... All of your additions will be reverted until you learn how to properly create references. David notMD (talk) 21:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Also, as you were advised earlier, medicine/health articles require compliance with WP:MEDRS. This means no adding content and references that are about individual clinical trials. That includes citing your own work. Acceptable references are limited to reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in journals of good reputation. When any article is referenced, the author(s) names are not used in the text of the article. David notMD (talk) 09:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Grateful Sir. Please delete as appropriate. Sorry for inconveniences Olaniyanmat (talk) 00:49, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Solanecio biafrae


A tag has been placed on Solanecio biafrae requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://uses.plantnet-project.org/en/Solanecio_biafrae_(PROTA). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. creffett (talk) 14:33, 9 February 2020 (UTC) ==Your draft article, Draft:Nutritional immunology is the study of the biological responsibilities of immune system as it affects food allergies, nutritional and metabolic disorders generating immune products detectable by immunoassay techniques==

Hello, Olaniyanmat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nutritional immunology is the study of the biological responsibilities of immune system as it affects food allergies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:12, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Professor Mathew Folaranmi Olaniyan moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Professor Mathew Folaranmi Olaniyan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources per our policy on biographies of living persons. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kleuske (talk) 13:27, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, Per MOS:CREDENTIAL, Wikipedia omits the title "professor". Good luck. Kleuske (talk) 13:29, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Professor Mathew Folaranmi Olaniyan


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Professor Mathew Folaranmi Olaniyan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Waddles 🗩 🖉 14:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Professor Mathew Folaranmi Olaniyan
Hello, Olaniyanmat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Professor Mathew Folaranmi Olaniyan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Professor Mathew Folaranmi Olaniyan


Hello, Olaniyanmat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Professor Mathew Folaranmi Olaniyan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:19, 11 March 2023 (UTC)