User talk:Oldelpaso/Archive 5

Sidibe
Cheers! Don't suppose you have a link.....? ChrisTheDude 23:02, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Norwich City F.C. at FAC
Hi Oldelpaso. Spot on as usual with some well directed comments. Please take a look at the FAC page... while we've not yet "dealt" with everything you raised, TRMan has a query on one of your comments. --Dweller 11:16, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Derry City F.C. article peer-review
I'm just letting you know that I have left a comment on the peer-review page regarding my progress with the article. Danny InvincibleTalk 05:50, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Template:Football
Done. Just use. Tom pw (talk) (review) 18:49, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

The Guard-York.
Hi, just wondering why The Guard was deleted suddenly from the band list on the York page. They were certainly very well known on the York music scene in the 1980's, ironicly better well known than some of the other bands in the list! Look forward to your reply, cheers. Dashwortley 00:47, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Zola
Is this the sort of thing you mean? http://www.apiatigers.com/alt/news.asp?ID=91 Ericoides 17:33, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

YCFC
Hey, I thought I'd drop you a line to say I think I've got your problems with the York City FAC sorted out. Thanks, Mattythewhite 14:59, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry about the moreover! Must try harder... The Rambling Man 20:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Dealt with your latest comments. Mattythewhite 20:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Do you think the recent edits by Johnlp to the article have been beneficial? Mattythewhite 21:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Andriy Shevchenko
Mind checking the semi-protection template on his article when you get a chance? It's been vandalised a few times in the last couple of hours by anonymous editors. Thanks. - Dudesleeper · Talk 22:38, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Is four enough? - Dudesleeper · Talk 22:04, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Apologies for pestering you with that. Last week was World Vandalism Week it seemed, and I was getting highly peeved. - Dudesleeper · Talk 14:44, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Ice Hockey Project discussion of hockey player notability and project scope
Please come join the WikiProject Ice Hockey Notability standards for hockey players discussion. I'd like to see input from all our project members who have an opinion. Thanks! ColtsScore 02:35, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

York City FA
Thanks for the barnstar and your contributions made to the York City article! Its finally got that star on it now! Take care, Mattythewhite 10:36, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Aston Villa
I have cleaned up the Aston Villa page as much as i could, and i was looking around to see who was good at editing articles i was wondering if you had sometime would you be able to or help me edit the history section down? And also help improve its Scale rating. (Everlast1910 11:58, 5 May 2007 (UTC))

Hey thanks for the pointer quiet a few! :). I have just extended the 82 Cup winning section to the best of my knowledge and use of a website which was written by a man who knows a lot about Villa i was wondering if you would be willing to help...as i have only started i would say in the last few days to really get into Wikipedia and don't know much about it and also creating things. And my English isn't the best.

Thanks Andy

(Everlast1910 21:46, 6 May 2007 (UTC))

Thank you very much and i will get onto find more references!

Thanks once again Andy

(Everlast1910 22:15, 6 May 2007 (UTC))

Derry City F.C. FAC
Thanks for the advice. Other than the prose, are there any other outstanding issues you feel would prevent the article from attaining featured article status? I think I have dealt with most of the structural and image issues, although the team photo still remains in the article. Both myself and SeanMack have emailed the photographer, however, and are awaiting an email which will hopefuly enable confirmation of permission.

Also, have you any idea what to do about a reference link that is now dead but stored in Google's cache? I fear it may not remain there on a permanent basis. (See my comment three paragraphs from the top of the page in the FAC from 12:26, 3 May 2007 (UTC).)

Regarding the prose, if you feel that there are any other specific areas that need better explanation, maybe you could point them out, or take the editing into your own hands if you so wish? Sometimes it can be hard to spot areas which a newcomer to the topic would find difficult to comprehend when you know the topic pretty much inside-out yourself and would take some of it for granted. Cheers. Danny InvincibleTalk 14:28, 7 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I had no luck with the archive site. Anyway, the FAC page was closed (by a bot, it seems) even though I had dealt with many of the points and was in the middle of sorting out the outstanding issues. Have you any advice on what I should do next? Your edits to the article were fine and very helpful, by the way. The only part to which I re-added text was:
 * ''The club won the 1964–65 Irish League and subsequently became the first Irish League team to win a European tie by beating FK Lyn 8–6 on aggregate in the European Cup. The Second Round did not take place, as the IFA claimed that Brandwell was not up to standard, even though a game had been played there during the previous round.
 * Other Irish League teams had won individual European ties (i.e. either the first leg or second leg but went out due to an inferior aggregate score) as far as I know, while Derry were the first to win a tie on aggregate. I thought better clarification may have been needed so I inserted "over two legs" after "European tie". Also, the Second Round did actually commence with Derry playing Anderlecht in Belgium for the first leg. The second leg was not played though and Anderlecht were awarded a 'walkover'.


 * I think it is generally accepted the the worst of the Troubles took place during the early 1970s. Rioting, street-violence and death tolls peaked around 1972. However, I've left "despite significant improvements in the overall security situation over the years" out as the fact that the RUC ruled the area safe to stage football again would suggest an improvement anyway. Danny InvincibleTalk 06:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

I think it might be worth keeping the mention of Aston Villa in the jersey section. It explains why the colours of claret and blue in particular were first chosen. Danny InvincibleTalk 19:37, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, it got there at last. I just wanted to say thanks very much for all the continuous help and advice you gave. Cheers. Danny InvincibleTalk 13:07, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Football club logos in season pages
So... There are so much articles are such like that e.g. UEFA CL articles, so they should also be reverted, but I saw nothing. KyleRGiggs 13:20, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Palermo
The word is singular but always used with a plural article (e.g. i rosanero). In fact it is a bit curious, as all other teams refer to their nickname changing both article and word in the plural form (e.g., i rossoneri, i giallorossi, and i rossoblu too, as blu is invariable in Italian). I don't really think there's one particular reason different than the fact that i rosaneri would sound a bit weird in Italian. --Angelo 12:00, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Manchester Meetup
Hi, just getting in touch because you expressed an interest in the meetup here. Some people have expressed a view that they would be able to make it were the date moved from Fri 8 June to Sat 9 June. Obviously its now getting pretty close, so I thought a quick poll would be the best the way to find out the better day. If you're still interested, it would be great if you could say whether you can make either or both days here. Thanks, WjBscribe 16:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: MCFC and grammar
With regard to the example you gave, I agree that "Manchester City was founded..." would sound odd. However, "Manchester City Football Club was founded..." sounds perfectly normal to me. As the name implies, discretionary plural is a matter of discretion and, by extension, opinion. Also, with regard to the run-on sentences, I guess that's just a by-product of my upbringing as a writer of complex English. It seemed logical to make the paragraph flow better. I was just being bold with my editing. Glad you appreciated some of the other edits though. I hope my work gets properly acknowledged someday. Would be nice to have more than just the one barnstar I have already. PeeJay 17:19, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

George Wynn
I have some stats and career history for him if you like Blogdroed 19:36, 3 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I've added some international stats now Blogdroed 13:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Peer review/M62 motorway/archive2
I've replied to your concerns there. Will (talk) 11:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Email
Just to let you know, I've sent you an email about the Manchester meet up, regards  Ry an P os tl et hw ai te  11:29, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Oldham categories at Cfd
The question of whether 'Oldham' cats should be renamed to 'Metropoloitan Borough of Oldham' has been taken to CfD, see Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_June_9. As far as I can tell, this renaming proposal would apply to Wigan, Stockport and all other metropolitan boroughs - UK-wide - that share a name with a town. Your contributions would be welcome. Mr Stephen 15:35, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

The WP:GA review of 1930 FIFA World Cup on hold
Please address the one issue below and let me know...


 * 1) Fair use rationale needs to be added to Image:1930 Football World Cup poster.jpg

Jazznutuva 08:46, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks... will pass as soon as required 48 hour hold period expires. Jazznutuva 07:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Jack Redshaw
My apologies ChrisTheDude 06:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Youth player notability
I disagree with the current... Just kidding. I just wanted to thank you for participating in the discussion and for helping a newbie understand Wikipedia better. Cheers, Sebisthlm 12:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

re Adminship?
Thanks for your kind words. I thought quite seriously about it several months ago, then rather went off the idea. Recently I've been wavering a bit. Unfortunately, some things in 'real life' are popping up at unpredictable times (for example, I've been unavoidably off-wiki for a few days now after about ten minutes notice), and so I don't think now is a good time. A couple of months should see that problem off, then perhaps it'll be time for another look. Again, thanks. Regards, Mr Stephen 08:54, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Featured article review Manchester City F.C.
Manchester City F.C. has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.

Your message
With regards to the message you have left on my userpage, I notice you have not left any on jhamez84's yet he violated 3RR. Have you actually checked my edits? Would you please tell me which ones are unreasonable. I think the one on the Lancashire page about the Palatine boundaries are particularly important since Jhamez84 is actuall making a claim that is not back up by a citation (or at least open to interpretation). Instead of throwing your wait about maybe you should do something constructive and try to resolve the dispute, since I have willingly enetered into discussion on the talk page. Instead of making threats why don't you go there, look at the arguments and express your own opinion. 88.104.88.173 19:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations
Hello. I think you need to be awarded for your greatness. I'm not gonna give you a barnstar, but I just want to say keep it up. You are the kind of man we want on this project. Christine118500 17:18, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Manchester
Would you be interested in passing comment here? Jza84 12:01, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I know you're away, or maybe disinterested, but I would appreciate any feedback you may have to give here. Hope all's well, Jza84 00:21, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Paul Dickov
Hey Oldelpaso, just thought I'd let you know that I'll be reviewing PD for GA as part of the GAC drive. While he's incredibly frustrating to watch, I remember him scoring for City in the playoff final (a few years ago!) and remain impressed by his tenacity. But anyhow, I'll let you know what I think, my comments will no doubt have a slight WP:FA bias to them but hopefully they'll be useful. More soon. All the best... The Rambling Man 07:38, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * He's on hold, but the comments are minor so let me know when you've attended to them and I'll review for a pass. Cheers!  The Rambling Man 08:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, Mattythewhite attended to the issues I raised so all good, you have a GA. Good work.  The Rambling Man 12:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Football on the main page.
Just letting you know I've made a request for a football team article to appear on the main page for the start of the season. Today's featured article/requests Buc 07:38, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Adminship nomination
Thanks for nominating me. Just to let you know I am accepting it. --Angelo 16:32, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Thornton?
May I ask on what basis you labeled the article on Thornton Square as a likely hoax? I don't mean this to sound accusatory; it's just that I don't see anything that strikes me as prima facie bullshit. DS 15:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar
Blimey, after such fulsome praise I really don't know what to say except thanks! :-) ChrisTheDude 20:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Joey Barton
Hi. I'm going to be away for the next week on holiday, so I was hoping that you might be able see to some of the changes that need to be made, if you get a chance. I'm going to need some help with the prose anyway (as I said on the peer review), but if you could make any improvements at all it would be greatly appreciated. I'm no expert but I think the article could be quite close to FA candidacy. Thanks in advance. Sir-Nobby 19:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Just to let you know my Request for Adminship ended successfully. Thank you very much for your support. --Angelo 21:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Darius Vassell
New squad numbers released on the official site here. Mattythewhite 17:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

List of Aston Villa F.C. players
Thanks for moving that back. I didn't realise you were an administrator. You saved us a lot of work going through the WP:RM process. I have talked to the other contributor and he only wants what is best for the artticle, as do i. If the consensus and status quo of WP:FOOTY is to have it as List of... then we are quite happy for it to stay that way. If i'm honest i had not thought about the fact that the name could be miscontrued like you said it could. This is despite the fact that i got Victoria Cross to FA and so should know all about it! Thanks again. Woodym555 21:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * As an aside, you couldn't pass judgement on the list could you? Need as many comments as possible, given your experience, your opinions would be welome on the FLC. Could you also delete Featured list candidates/List of notable Aston Villa F.C. players. Another remnant of the move. Thanks again Woodym555 21:48, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

My edit to Football (soccer)
Thanks, i had seen other users making similar change to other articles but i misunderstood the guideline. Poobslag 12:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

James Milner
Just wondering if you could give me any advice on how I could impove this article? Buc 16:38, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your feedback. Could you piont out the blog ref to me. Yes I agree the "Style of play" and "off the pitch" sections are pretty poor right now because I just don't know and can't find any info to put in there. I thought the bit about his comment to UEFA could be used as an example of a feature to his personality, but I'm not sure what. As for the season sections, I'm going to ask all the members of WikiProject Football about what they think is the best idea and I'll use the most popular. Buc 16:23, 13 August 2007 (UTC)