User talk:Oldgreggpwns

Speedy deletion of Ethan Allen Clark
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dekisugi (talk) 21:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Talk:Ethan Allen Clark
A tag has been placed on Talk:Ethan Allen Clark, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Randomtime (talk) 21:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC)


 * It's not that the article is derogatory per se, it's that it is unsourced and therefore potentially libellous, so according to Wikipedia policy it must be deleted immediately. What needs to happen for this article to remain is that it be provided with sources -- independent third-party sources such as articles in newspapers and magazines -- that can validate what you say.  Otherwise, it's just your assertions as to what the facts are, and we cannot rely on those.  See the policy statements at WP:Verifiable and WP:Notable for more information. I hope this helps; leave a note on my talk page if you need further assistance.  Accounting4Taste: talk 21:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC)