User talk:Oldlaptop321/A1

This page is an archive of Oldlaptop321's talk page, please do not edit it, if you have current comments to make, please do so at the current talk page. Thank you. 

Zorbeez article (put under header by Oldlaptop321 (talk) 19:41, 20 March 2009 (UTC))
Hello! It's a bit promotional, but after reviewing the entry, I'll honor your request and restore the article. Thank you very much for the contribution. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:53, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

You bet. I'm more than happy to help. I don't have the time to work on it now, but I may try my own hand at cleaning it up when I have some more time. Have a great weekend! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Rollback
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see New admin school/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:26, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Cookie


Firestorm Talk has eaten your cookie! The cookie made happy and 'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

User Talk DBpedia
The User_Talk page of the DBpedia account is for testing purposes in a live extraction framework. see http://dbpedia.org. I checked with other members of the Wikipedia community and they reconed I and others could edit freely in the User Space. So there will be more changes possibly also by other not logged in Users to User_talk:DBpedia If this is an annoyance, please give me feedback on how to improve this situation as I'm unfamiliar with Wikipedia Rules for an Overview see here: User:DBpedia  Sebastian Hellmann DBpedia (talk) 13:59, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Hyperkalemic periodic paralysis
Please stop reverting my edit. I moved a section which is why you might think it was vandalism. 83.146.12.20 (talk) 15:49, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:21, 23 April 2009 (UTC)



Enviroboy TalkCs has eaten your cookie! The cookie made happy and 'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

You're welcome. munch munch munch. Enviroboy TalkCs 00:42, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Bid'ah
Please note that I have reverted your undo on my recent edits to the above-mentioned article. The edits I was reverting were changes to material that are indicated as direct quotations; the new editor cannot simply change the wording in the direct quote and claim they come from the same source-either the reference says what is quoted or it doesn't.

More troubling is the removal of the tag indicating a need for primary sources. The whole article indicates direct quotations in English with references to texts (mostly primary: Qur'an, hadith, etc.) which are in Arabic. Quite clearly, these sources cannot be the source of the English quotations. These problems need to be indicated on the article. Note also that there is a discussion that I've opened on the article's discussion page. Thanks.Vote Cthulhu (talk) 01:59, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Inappropriate warnings
Hello, I think the warning templates you are leaving for User:Vote Cthulhu are inappropriate. He is not vandalizing the page. You two have a content dispute. Lady of Shalott 02:00, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I do not want to edit war; I've initiated discussion on the talk page and have explained the reasons for my edits in the history as well as here. There are problems with the article in question which need to be addressed.Vote Cthulhu (talk) 02:02, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zorbeez
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Zorbeez, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable, limited sourcing, quasi-advertisement

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Vote Cthulhu (talk) 02:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba (talk) 14:46, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

clever as a bot
Congrats on being exactly as clever as a bot. Please see Steven Dale Green, and e.g. here. I'm just updating the article according to verifiable facts. 78.34.130.54 (talk) 01:33, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok then. Sorry for the tone above, but mindless reverting because "it looks somewhat like it could be vandalism (and Cluebot thought so, too)" is very unnerving. 78.34.130.54 (talk) 01:38, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Shameless thankspam
Hello Oldlaptop321! Thank you so much for your support in my  recent RfA , which passed with a tally of 126 / 32 / 5. I am truly humbled by the trust you placed in me, and will endeavor to live up to that trust.  Flying Toaster 

Thirteen (House)
User:Sceptre has again reverted your edits. I assume good faith but this user keeps reverting the proposal to merge this article like it was his personal property. Why not take it to a vote by the users? Is there something wrong with this user?George Pelltier (talk) 00:08, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Welcome!
 21655  ταλκ / 01ҁ 22:38, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

How Am I Vandelizing The Ñeta's page?
All im trying to do is fix the information box that some one obviously messed up before me. It was fine the other day. Please instead of trying to block me help in fixing it. im familiar with hot mail text codes thats why im trying to do so, but am getting negative feedback by you and others —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.227.153.231 (talk) 23:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Re:How Am I Vandelizing The Ñeta's page?
Thanks OldLaptop321. Can i now return to editing the page to fix the info box and so on? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.227.153.231 (talk) 23:36, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Opinion needed
Please comment at Talk:PokerTracker.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:47, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * This is about to hit the main page at DYK in about 45 minutes. If you could take a quick look at the most recent proposed change that would be helpful.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 21:07, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Adoption (moved from userpage)
Dear Oldlaptop321, it would be a pleasure if you would adopt me. If this is the case please let me know in which way I can develop and test the English transformation of my German Wikipedia article on Fjodor Sakharow, a Russian painter. The German wikipedia and my German mentor offered a so called workshop utility for this purpose Kind regards--Romanoff3 (talk) 13:27, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

PokerTracker
Could you please close out Talk:PokerTracker/GA1 and Talk:PokerTracker. If you have any final commentary that would be appreciated.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 14:46, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
With regards to this, it's all in the reading of the policy.

Examples:
 * Keep – VoteyMcVoter 01:01, 1 January 2001 (UTC)
 * Delete – JoeMcVoter 23:28, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

This is not an argument for deletion at all, it's a vote. It's basically saying that the above example is not presenting an argument for deletion, they are purely voting. Does that make sense? Best, Steve Crossin Talk/Help us mediate! 02:52, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, that makes sense. I thought the sentence was referring to the AFD process itself. -- Oldlaptop321 (talk·contribs) 02:59, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Nope, not at all. Was referring to the example. Best, Steve Crossin Talk/Help us mediate! 03:01, 16 June 2009 (UTC)