User talk:Oldridge

March 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gogglebox has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gogglebox was changed by Oldridge (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853815 on 2015-03-26T19:57:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:57, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Downton Abbey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 23:44, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ThisIsDanny (talk) 18:24, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Proposed deletion of Retarded Policeman


The article Retarded Policeman has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Winner 42 Talk to me!  19:02, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Retarded Policeman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Retarded Policeman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Retarded Policeman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Winner 42 Talk to me!  19:35, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Retarded Policeman merger
The content of this page isn't going away, but unfortunately it isn't important enough (notable) to have its own page. It is being merged with the creator's page at Greg Benson. Techhead7890 (talk) 03:08, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits at Family Guy
Before again adding headings and tables to the "Broadcast" section of Family Guy, please familiarise yourself with WP:TVINTL and WP:UNDUE. Specifically, tables are not used in the section and individual countries should not be given undue weight. The additions that you made are not supported by the MOS and should not be added again. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 19:06, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

2017 Westminster attack
Please stop the slow-burn edit war on this. There is a talk page to discuss the much-challenged addition. I was hoping that - as per your last edit summary - there was a "Reason in talk page", but I see you have not posted. Please put forward your side of the discussion on the talk page and see if there is a consensus to add this. - The Bounder (talk) 19:27, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

2017 Westminster attack
There was an issue with me posting in my talk page. The news coverage is relevant because it shows the changes in schedules reflecting the importance of the event to the country. It is relevant and doesn't need to keep on getting deleted. it is all 100% true and I would be happy for you to source it if you wanted. It is a harmless bit of extra information so please don't delete it as it's unnecessary.


 * I see that you have tried yet again to put the information in and another editor has removed it again. This is beginning to be disruptive, and you need to stop. Instead, please open a discussion at Talk:2017 Westminster attack for a consensus to develop. - The Bounder (talk) 18:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at The O2 Arena, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:40, 10 July 2017 (UTC)