User talk:Oldschoolboxing

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 2 . O . Boxing 21:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey! Who are "Mr. Briggs" and "Benji" that you mentioned? --MrClog (talk) 21:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Terry Ray
In case you somehow missed the pings on the talk page, I’ll comment here. The only objection you’ve had to adding the fact that Terry Ray was convicted of sexual battery on a 14 year old girl is your claim that it’s "false content", yet you just added two references from the same source (tribstar) that detailed his conviction for sexual battery on a 14 year old girl. You can’t say the sourced content is false then use the same source. I’ve reinstated it. Sincerely, not "Mr. Briggs" or "Benji" lol – 2 . O . Boxing  22:34, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Your recent editing history at Terry Ray (boxer) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ahecht (TALK PAGE ) 00:17, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 2 . O . Boxing 00:55, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring at Terry Ray (boxer)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:00, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Terry Ray (boxer), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. – 2 . O . Boxing  16:44, 29 May 2020 (UTC)