User talk:Oldsham


 * }

Proposed deletion of Aaron Buliani


The article Aaron Buliani has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Cannot find verification of the subject either as "Aaron Buliani" or "Peter (Smith) Buliani".

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... disco spinster   talk  21:46, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dan Peterson Michaels


The article Dan Peterson Michaels has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no WP:reliable sources. Reads like a eulogy.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 16:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Feces, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=487766208 here]. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ bomb  01:46, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cattle. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=487768054 here]. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ bomb  02:03, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Faerts


A tag has been placed on Faerts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Singularity42 (talk) 00:13, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to We R Who We R, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: We R Who We R was changed by Oldsham (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952065 on 2012-04-26T00:19:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:20, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Family Guy with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 02:21, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. BjörnBergman 16:09, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Dog Days (film), you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:08, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Rush Limbaugh, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Rush Limbaugh was changed by Oldsham (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9752 on 2012-09-23T23:41:12+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:41, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.--rogerd (talk) 22:06, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey was changed by Oldsham (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951865 on 2013-01-02T01:00:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:01, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Elvis Presley. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 14:32, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Speedy deletion of "Benjamin Mikmans"
A page you created, Benjamin Mikmans, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. RA talkcontribs 22:44, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Pig, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Singularity42 (talk) 03:06, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Webclient101. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Sarah Palin, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Webclient101 talk 15:48, 12 May 2013 (UTC)