User talk:Olesachem

Dump digging
Hey there, nice work cleaning up this article. I see you did a substantial rewrite. But what are your sources? If you could also cite references for your content that would be excellent, and we may yet may a high quality article out of this. -- &oelig; &trade; 05:34, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Historical digging


The article Historical digging has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I like to saw logs! (talk) 03:48, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Historical digging for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Historical digging is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Historical digging until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. I like to saw logs! (talk) 06:35, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Privy digging for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Privy digging is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Privy digging until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. I like to saw logs! (talk) 06:52, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sockpuppetry, see Sockpuppet investigations/Olesachem. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexandria (chew out) 14:44, 1 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment for reviewing administrator(s): I looked into the accounts, and concur with Mailer Diablo's findings at the SPI. From a checkuser/technical perspective, this account is a very likely match to the other two listed at Sockpuppet investigations/Olesachem/Archive. From a behavioural perspective, all three accounts edit an identical subject area, and there is a close overlap in the editing times and in other habits. AGK   [&bull; ]  16:48, 2 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Olesachem, could you offer an explanation with regards to the other two users? - Mailer Diablo 18:10, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Doll head.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Doll head.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 00:14, 18 May 2018 (UTC)