User talk:Olgamatveeva

Welcome!
Hello, Olgamatveeva, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:02, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires attribution
Hi. I see in a recent addition to Sendai virus you included material from a webpage that is available under a Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:03, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sendai virus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conformation ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Sendai_virus check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Sendai_virus?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello, I'm Alexbrn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Please see WP:MEDCOI and WP:REFSPAM. Thank you. Alexbrn (talk) 04:02, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm GenQuest. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Sputnik V COVID-19 vaccine have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. GenQuest "scribble" 18:16, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 20)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Olgamatveeva/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Individual research studies are not considered notable unless there is a considerable body of independent secondary sources discussing the study.

bonadea contributions talk 19:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Dear bonadea, You did not understand me. I'm not trying to create an article per se. I would like to improve this subsection in already written article by replacing press releases with science-based information. However, I am a co-author of a scientific study, so due to a conflict of interest, I cannot write the text myself. I completely agree with your statement that Individual research studies are not considered notable unless there is a considerable body of independent secondary sources discussing the study. However, I believe that there are exceptional cases in which primary sources can also be helpful. The information vacuum surrounding even one COVID-19 vaccine can create rumor and superstition. It is good to have a reliable secondary source of information, but until that secondary source emerges, it is better to have three primary sources from scientific studies than one, instead of press releases and information from preprints or complete silence. Due to the high importance of the topic, a few citations to primary sources of peer-reviewed articles can be useful they can help build a bridge to more reliable information in the future.   Olgamatveeva (talk) 21:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC).
 * I understand, and would like to commend you for being open about your conflict of interest and for respecting Wikipedia's policies for COI editing. To suggest a new section or a revision of an existing section in an article, you should use that article's talk page; the draft process and reviews only deal with drafts of standalone articles. --bonadea contributions talk 18:24, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for clarification.

Olgamatveeva (talk) 19:22, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding User:Olgamatveeva/sandbox
Hello, Olgamatveeva. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Olgamatveeva/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Olgamatveeva/sandbox


Hello, Olgamatveeva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:55, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)