User talk:Olimacfan

Image copyright problem with Image:Ecocityreborn.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Ecocityreborn.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:41, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Sustainable city / Ecocity
I saw that you removed the merge tags on the Sustainable city article and turned a redirect for "Ecocity" into an article. Please note that Wikipedia editorial decisions are made by consensus. There was a discussion about the merges, and some decisions made. Not that decisions cannot be changed. However, when a number of editors have discussed a particular subject, that carries weight and should not be unilaterally ignored or overturned. I have moved your text on "Ecocity" back to the Sustainable city talk page for now. You would be welcome to join the discussion. Sunray (talk) 17:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Your point about the difference between an "ecocity" and existing cities that call themselves "sustainable cities" is a good one. Now that we have respected the first decision (i.e., to combine the articles), I think it may be time to reconsider, based on what you have said. I've put a note to that effect on the Sustainable city talk page. I'm wondering if you would help out with finding citations. I also think that we should establish a better definition: something along the lines of "cities built according to ecological principles," and distinguish ecocities from eco-municipalities and "sustainable cities." Sunray (talk) 23:17, 17 February 2008 (UTC)