User talk:OliverTwist88

Welcome to Wikipedia!
- Welcome-

Further to our chat
I have made a copy of the article, as of 8 July, in User:OliverTwist88/Golden Team.  Chzz  ► 22:24, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary&#32;for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. &oelig; &trade; 20:16, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
 Connormah  talk 05:27, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

In case you missed it
Please read WP:OWN. Nobody owns articles on Wikipedia. This is a collaborative project. Have you noticed the If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here. under the 'Save page' button? If you don't want it to be 'tampered with', then please do not submit it. Thanks.  Connormah  talk 06:30, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm going to seriously respectfully suggest that you take a look at Wikipedia's policy on article ownership. Your attitude towards other editors trying to fix article issues is undesirable.  Connormah  talk 07:29, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.  Connormah  talk 07:32, 25 July 2010 (UTC)  Connormah  talk 07:35, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:02, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to User talk:L Kensington constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. —  Jeff G. ツ  08:11, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

 Connormah  talk 15:16, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi
Hi OliverTwist88 great to see you editing and adding info to Wikipedia. However to add large portions of text they must be references. Please read Verifiability and Identifying reliable sources...If you have any questions pls just let me know. Moxy (talk) 05:35, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok i understand. and have reverted my revert :) ..I guess this was moved to main space two early and should still be on a User page ..but o well..i am assuming good faith here and hope refs will follow in the near future.Moxy (talk) 05:56, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Ferenc Puskas4.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ferenc Puskas4.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:35, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Mighty Magyars.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mighty Magyars.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:36, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Sandor Kocsis.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sandor Kocsis.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:50, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Hidegkuti3.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hidegkuti3.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? feydey (talk) 19:50, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Black Army of Hungary
Thank you for your message. I hope I didn't ruin anything you've created. I tried to leave anything intact that was originally in the article and included them in my edits. The tougher part was to find them references since it wasn't me who wrote them (e.g. the comparaison of Matthias to great historical figures). I try to add what I can to the Golden team but I'm mostly interested in tennis articles beside the history ones. But I suggest using huszadikszazad.hu and mvh.dev.nava.hu for older articles but if you have problems reading Hungarian I will happily help to contribute.  Lajbi  Holla @ me  •  CP  18:14, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I guess there's a "rule" for infoboxes to be on top. So I must say it should be left there, but the next picture can be the one with the pavises. I just one to fit the pictures into the article and not batching them in one place.  Lajbi  Holla @ me  •  CP  19:42, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Bozsik.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bozsik.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:24, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Buzanszky.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Buzanszky.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:25, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Czibor.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Czibor.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:35, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Grosics.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Grosics.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:55, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Black Army of Hungary
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Black Army of Hungary, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you.

Please Unblock Me, this is a terrible misunderstanding

 * You can email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. We don't use lawyers or advocates, and . Which is another way of saying checkuser can't be used to prove a negative. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:22, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

OliverTwist88, please refrain from personal atacks as per WP:CIVIL. Stop calling me a Romanian chauvanist (it is important to say that this epithet is used very often against me by the socks of the banned user Stubes99: ) (Iaaasi (talk) 09:32, 22 January 2011 (UTC))


 * I'm giving you the opportunity to be unblocked. Please see the note at User talk:GrandMariner. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 20:24, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Please unblock this account
I understand that wikipedia has a one username per user rule. HelloAnnoying, please unblock this account 'OliverTwist' instead of 'GrandMariner'. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.25.218.254 (talk) 00:29, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * There was also the part about "As long as you're willing to promise not to make edits like these (i.e. threaten other users)". Do you agree to that? --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:54, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't think this user has fulfilled the conditions for being unblocked. After his personal attacks on my talk page, he was promised to be unblocked only if he will revise his behaviour. But he put yesterday on my talk page a message of the same type so he does not seem to have changed his attitude (Iaaasi (talk) 06:11, 23 March 2011 (UTC))

Just a note
FYI Iaaasi has been granted an indef. block a while ago. I can understand that you were a bit agitated when you made that comment on Iaaasi's talk page the other day, but please understand that you have to keep it cool. Wikipedia is not Usenet where you can engage in all the endless trolling and flame wars your heart can desire. So if you think that you might be able to discuss issues over the Golden Magyars article with Coopuk and others in a calm manner, refrain from emotional outbursts in the future (but only then!) and also refrain evading your block with IP edits and creating additional accounts, go ahead and give your request another try via IRC at #wikipedia-en and #wikipedia-en-unblock channels. But for that you REALLY have to leave your emotional outbursts at the door. CoolKoon (talk) 16:29, 25 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Please try to keep the whole discussion at one place. You don't have to worry about Iaaasi for a while (at least for now...) as he has managed to blow his second chance by an edit war in another article.
 * Personally I'm not too fond of the "Magical Magyars" title either, because it doesn't mean anything to me (hence I prefer the "Golden Team"). Since it's well-known in the UK though, they MIGHT've had a valid point. As for the changes, there's one thing you obviously haven't bothered with/didn't care about: citing sources and/or citing them often enough. Other editors have repeated countless times that you MUST cite sources and Wikipedia is no grounds to original research. Unfortunately I have to tell you that Coopuk and even Iaaasi (him being especially keen on wikilawyering, gaming the system and making humongous efforts to appear as someone who's encouraging others to abide by the WP policies) were right when they've removed parts of your additions on grounds of lack of sources and others for lack of neutrality. A Wikipedia article's not meant to "praise" or "endorse" anyone or anything. It's meant to provide information about various topics in a neutral manner. Wording such as "One of the most technically superb teams in history" are absolutely unacceptable. If you can cite some sources who say this, do so. E.g. "The team has been called one of the most technically superb teams in history by the majority of sources (citations go here)". One would think that since you're from the US, you've gotten used for this kind of wording from local newspapers (where writing articles without a neutral tone's completely unacceptable)... Unfortunately this might've been also the reason admins sided with Coopuk, Iaaasi and co. instead of you. Please try to stick to these rules and it'll be much harder for others to remove your edits from the article (or undo them). If they nevertheless attempt to do it (especially without any signs of discussion), feel free to report them at WP:ANI quoting the fact that they're vandalizing the page by removing well-sourced content.
 * As far as HelloAnnyong is concerned I might try to have a heart-to-heart with him, but my chance of success is pretty slim. First of all I'm not an admin, he's also accused me of recruiting a meatpuppet at the SPI investigation of my account started by User:Diannaa. When I've tried to talk some sense into him, he just outright refused to listen to anything I've said, kept repeating that User:Koalicio is my meatpuppet and didn't even bother reacting to my reply. CoolKoon (talk) 12:43, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Lorant.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lorant.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Non-Free rationale for File:Lantos.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lantos.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Zakarias.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Zakarias.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 7 August 2012 (UTC)