User talk:Oliverkeenan

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Oliverkeenan! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created  are  Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:46, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Philip Pargeter -
 * 2) Alessandro Perego -
 * 3) Edmundo Mellid -

Proposed deletion of Alessandro Perego


The article Alessandro Perego has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Completely non-notable individual, only coverage is from the source cited in the article, which is self-published, contains only a brieg mention, and does not say anything that might indicate notability. A Google News search returns no related results.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Lear's Fool 06:29, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Edmundo Mellid


The article Edmundo Mellid has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern: Edmundo Mellid – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.'''
 * '''A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 08:42, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed Image Deletion
A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. When you recently edited Christopher Pepys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Mann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the notification. OliverKeenanOP (talk) 15:26, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Horarium for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horarium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Horarium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Sandstein  23:29, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Articles_for_deletion/Waking_the_Tiger_(2nd_nomination)
Kindly participate in the voting if you are still around. Thank you.--Jondel (talk) 07:17, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Next sitting Friday


The article Next sitting Friday has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "So what? Political jargon which at the very most belongs at Wiktionary."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 14:44, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Aldebaranrad.JPG


The file File:Aldebaranrad.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Uploader claims to have recorded the data themselves, which is WP:OR. Orphaned."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HouseBlastertalk 20:40, 1 September 2022 (UTC)