User talk:Olivetrees1122

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first pages you edited was Matty Healy, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that page.

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Best practices for editors with close associations
 * Plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you've had a new article rejected or deleted, new article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE  and on IRC chatAgain, welcome! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

October 2019
Hello, I'm Emadix. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Percy Jackson & the Olympians seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. → Emadix talk  19:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at J. K. Rowling. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Esowteric +  Talk  +  Breadcrumbs   18:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Matty Healy, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 19:27, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi Olivetrees1122! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Matty Healy several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 19:43, 25 April 2023 (UTC)


 * People on the talk page do reach a consensus, that the changes made to this page were completely biased and unfair. Olivetrees1122 (talk) 19:52, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Please use the article talk page to detail specific issues with the article. Donald Trump undoubtedly thinks the article about him is biased, but as long as it accurately summarizes reliable sources, the content is valid. Same for the article you are interested in. If sources are not accurately summarized, please tell how. If a source is making things up out of whole cloth, please tell how. 331dot (talk) 19:59, 25 April 2023 (UTC)